well well well, well of lost gnomes, you seem to have acquired a certain snobbery
"these posts are scummy and therefore bad. we need to correct this in the future."
rubish!
granted, every post should be readable. i'm assuming a certain degree of literacy here, one which a certain poster (who will remain unnamed) clearly lacks
however, outside of that, as long as someone is saying something — no matter what it is — i encourage it. much like a bad lynch is still a good thing because it gives information, a bad post is still a good thing despite its obvious inferiorities.
to all players, i say this: please increase the postcount of this thread by whatever means necessary. dont be intimidated by wolg. he's just frustrated in his attempts to make sense of chaos
I have a theory about a certain person in the game that has been rubbing me since the beginning, ill share it tomorrow, because Im almost certain somebody is mafia, and Im voting for him.
ImHungry, at least i can understand your posts, but cmon, make a little more sense, and content.
so let me get this straight
you have a theory about how someone is almost certainly a mafia, and you vote for him, but you refuse to share it with others
keeping a theory to yourself sometimes makes sense. a good example would be when you're defending a townie with a power role (although it's very difficult to not tip off the mafia as you defend him). however, when it comes to lynchin', sharing your theory is useful because it allows you to convince others that they should be putting their votes where you are putting yours
the "hidden theory" play makes you look scummy as hell. it adds "evidence" to a bandwagon without exposing that evidence to scrutiny, then tomorrow you can claim that it was just a theory, making you come off more stupid than scummy
so come out with it already
Quote from duberz »
Stupidy is something that is very common. More than half of the people in the US are stupid.* So something similar should be taken into consideration for the boards, (but maybe not that extreme).
*Source: 2004 Presidential election.
you're stupid*
Quote from Emerys »
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure that you were just trying to be funny when you posted that FORGED post that had my name on it.
If you wanted to make your point all you had to do was post, maybe making it bold "I guess not" or something else along those lines.
In the future DO NOT FORGE anymore posts with my name on them.
This may not be against the rules technically, but I personally consider it CHEATING.
I hope I have made myself clear.
you have. you are clearly being a crybaby
emerys, i like you. you post pictures of cute animals in serious threads, and i appreciate that. however, you're going down the wrong path here. force-feeding these people the nuances of lynching townies for information isn't going to work. period. give up. furthermore, getting all pissy about it and voting for someone who disagrees with you isn't very likely to track down the mafia either. i urge you to quit your personal crusade and get more in line with what the town as a whole is pursuing...
which doesn't happen to be very much at the moment but perhaps you can help us in that department
*source: the post wherein you imply that one of the major political parties is significantly less corrupt than the other
As for the problem at hand, I really dont know what to do about imhungry. He has played this game like an idiot, but he doesnt smell like an idiot scum to me. Just a plain old idiot. As for other people, i have absolutly no clue as of right now. My scumdar is not working at all it seems this game, so i must reread this thread before i start making some accusations.
considering that you were the first person in the game to vote for rikos, i think it's working just fine
Quote from Heywood Jablome »
ok, some rash foses thrown at me for little to no reason. If you do something, explain why you do it. It would also help the recieving end to defend them against the statement if the statement makes sense. This makes it easier for townies to point out that they're town.
Mr.D wasn't posting very constructively. He was just making up incredibly original names for me while burning me for lurking while I didn't lurk. That discourages one to read the rest of the post, even though I did read it. There was just no content.
this is a very akward attack. as mozart might say, the hint of desparation is setting off my scumdar
since i don't believe in foses i will vote hey would you blow me
Okay, so it looks like one more vote will seal it for imhungry. As I see no other lead, I can live with this, but I ask that everyone else holds out for just a little while longer. We still haven't heard from BBtigger, mozart, or Serf since yesterday, and I'd like to give them a little more time to speak up. There's no reason to finish off the day just yet.
on this basis i will unvote imhungry
no no no, i don't want any of you guys to unvote. i just want to hear from not one but two of the people on difranco's list
if we figure out that bbtigger, mozart, and serf are all in a deep sleep in the terry shiavo wing of a major hospital, i'll put my vote back on and we can be done with it
if you're not a lurker, don't vote for imhungry
if you are a lurker, post, damnit
@Morris I diddn't mean that as it sounded I meant it as you will now talk about if you investigated me and can claim (which I will do with 1 more vote) or say that you know of someone else to kill... Yes you have free speach and can say what ever you want (so srry for the confusion).
vote amnesiac
vote WellOfLostGnomes
vote Mr. Maestro
vote Mr DiFranco
vote True Believer
vote notstevie92
vote Emerys
vote Mozart
vote unvote
vote unvote
unvote
vote unvote
unvote
vote imhungry
fool! :mad1:
i was cocky before i was ever confirmed
and i'm like "you know this moron i was talking about last time? i put him on ignore list"
and he's like "well you're totally dominating this game right?"
and im like yeah
so he's like "well why don't you just get hm lynched for stupidity?"
and i'm like "because i've told people not to lynch because of stupidity?"
and he's like "well isn't this a special case?"
and i think he might have a point
no votes for now though
(but morris' friend votes imhungry)
btw postcount++
"these posts are scummy and therefore bad. we need to correct this in the future."
rubish!
granted, every post should be readable. i'm assuming a certain degree of literacy here, one which a certain poster (who will remain unnamed) clearly lacks
however, outside of that, as long as someone is saying something — no matter what it is — i encourage it. much like a bad lynch is still a good thing because it gives information, a bad post is still a good thing despite its obvious inferiorities.
to all players, i say this: please increase the postcount of this thread by whatever means necessary. dont be intimidated by wolg. he's just frustrated in his attempts to make sense of chaos
so let me get this straight
you have a theory about how someone is almost certainly a mafia, and you vote for him, but you refuse to share it with others
keeping a theory to yourself sometimes makes sense. a good example would be when you're defending a townie with a power role (although it's very difficult to not tip off the mafia as you defend him). however, when it comes to lynchin', sharing your theory is useful because it allows you to convince others that they should be putting their votes where you are putting yours
the "hidden theory" play makes you look scummy as hell. it adds "evidence" to a bandwagon without exposing that evidence to scrutiny, then tomorrow you can claim that it was just a theory, making you come off more stupid than scummy
so come out with it already
you're stupid*
you have. you are clearly being a crybaby
emerys, i like you. you post pictures of cute animals in serious threads, and i appreciate that. however, you're going down the wrong path here. force-feeding these people the nuances of lynching townies for information isn't going to work. period. give up. furthermore, getting all pissy about it and voting for someone who disagrees with you isn't very likely to track down the mafia either. i urge you to quit your personal crusade and get more in line with what the town as a whole is pursuing...
which doesn't happen to be very much at the moment
*source: the post wherein you imply that one of the major political parties is significantly less corrupt than the other
i may or may not have decided to go to gencon at the last minute
what i'm saying is "deal with player A first, then deal with player B" because votes are obv more important than foses
and i'd rather just deal with A and then switch my vote later :slant:
this is especially true when you're a confirmed townie and people tend to look to you
since i don't believe in foses i will vote hey would you blow me
no no no, i don't want any of you guys to unvote. i just want to hear from not one but two of the people on difranco's list
if we figure out that bbtigger, mozart, and serf are all in a deep sleep in the terry shiavo wing of a major hospital, i'll put my vote back on and we can be done with it
if you're not a lurker, don't vote for imhungry
if you are a lurker, post, damnit
by the way, guys, if imhungry says anything relevant, quote it in one of your posts. until then, ignorance is bliss
i am this close to ignorelisting him :slant:
point is, he didn't say doctor
so, uh, procede as usual. i have nothing more to contribute
imhungry promised he'd claim on 7 votes