2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Dismantling a Deck...and Remorse.
    Usually, no.

    When I dismantle a deck, it's usually because I've had my fun with it, and it's time to move on to something new. There's only so many times I could cast Maelstrom Wanderer before calling retiring the deck. Same with tutoring flying creatures with Isperia the Inscrutable. Or blowing people up with Neheb, the Eternal.

    The other times I take apart a deck is when it's an idea that does not seem to have a viable execution. I did this most recently with O-Kagachi, Vengeful Kami, where I wanted to put other players in a bind of attacking me (and suffering OK's vengeful exile ability), or to punish them for not attacking me (with cards like Luminarch Ascension). Sadly, there were not enough cards to execute the strategy, and players would often dance around OK's punishment with removal (despite my best efforts to protect OK and/or give him haste). I have many other decks that have failed in execution, OK only being the most recent.

    As for feeling bad that I've spent money on it... well, no. I've had my fun with the cards I played in my decks; I got a value of joy out of them incommensurate to the money I paid. Further, these cards aren't 'used up' or anything; many I owned before from previous EDH decks, and will be stored away to be played again in another. Even in decks that are relatively short-lived, such as in OK's case, I had Luminarch Ascension in many decks before OK, and will play it again in the future. Any singles I bought to include in OK will have the same life cycle, finding their way into decks, being dismantled and stored away, only to resurface again.

    My perspective on it might be different, though. I often buy cards long before they live in an EDH deck, some of which I think because they are neat in form or function. Case and Point, I think I've owned a Defiler of Souls for around 8 years now, but it only just found its way into a deck in the last month (Niv-Mizzet Reborn has no mono-coloured creatures, and Defiler gets drawn by Niv). I've also spent so much money on Magic over the time I've played that, at this point, any regret for an individual purchase or set of purchases would be a bucket of water next to a lake.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 1

    posted a message on Random Card of the Final Day: Maelstrom Nexus
    Quote from tstorm823 »


    Even if imprint itself has recieved some changes, the rules of linked abilities are still in place.

    607.1. An object may have two abilities printed on it such that one of them causes actions to be taken or objects or players to be affected and the other one directly refers to those actions, objects, or players. If so, these two abilities are linked: the second refers only to actions that were taken or objects or players that were affected by the first, and not by any other ability.

    607.2a If an object has an activated or triggered ability printed on it that instructs a player to exile one or more cards and an ability printed on it that refers either to “the exiled cards” or to cards “exiled with [this object],” these abilities are linked. The second ability refers only to cards in the exile zone that were put there as a result of an instruction to exile them in the first ability.

    linked abilities are one of the messiest parts of the rules, but I honestly don't think there is a concise way to express on each card that abilities are linked and don't refer to anything else. Imprint, I believe, was their attempt to make these connections clearer, but even that falls short of clearly expressing the intent of linked abilities, cause if you play imprint cards exactly as written, you could still Saheeli, Sublime Artificer a Knowledge Pool into a Mimic Vat and glitch the game out.


    Weird. I'm not saying your wrong; I think I just want to be clear on this matter.

    Mimic Vat functions on its own just fine with its two abilities. One, the Imprint ability, and then the activated ability. That makes sense.

    Let's consider Mairsil, the Pretender, with a Mimic Vat and a Shauku, Endbringer in the exile zone with a cage counter on both of them.

    Mairsil has three abilities:

    1. "When Mairsil, the Pretender enters the battlefield, you may exile an artifact or creature card from your hand or graveyard and put a cage counter on it."
    2. "{T}: Exile target creature and put a +1/+1 counter on Shauku. Activate this ability only once per turn."
    3. "{3}, {T}: Create a token that’s a copy of a card exiled with Mimic Vat. It gains haste. Exile it at the beginning of the next end step. Activate this ability only once per turn."

    For abilities 2 and 3, Rule 201.4b states that that name reference basically mean "this card" or, in this case, Mairsil (instead of "Shauku" or "Mimic Vat").
    Rule 607.1a states that "An ability printed on an object within another ability that grants that ability to that object is considered to be “printed on” that object for these purposes." I take this to mean that both abilities 2 and 3 are "printed on" Mairsil.

    Rule 607.2, previously cited, states that "If an object has an activated or triggered ability printed on it that instructs a player to exile one or more cards and an ability printed on it that refers either to “the exiled cards” or to cards “exiled with [this object],” these abilities are linked. The second ability refers only to cards in the exile zone that were put there as a result of an instruction to exile them in the first ability."

    Ability 1 and ability 2 are activated or triggered abilities that exile one or more cards. Check, seems okay.
    Ability 3 uses the words "Exiled with [this object]". Check, seems okay.

    I would conclude that these abilities are linked, even though they were never intended to be. I don't understand why are the exiled cards not considered linked.

    (nb. This is really hard for me to grok. This is less argument, and more exploratory logic.)

    cc: @DirkGently

    Edit: So, I asked some judges and they said that Linked abilities are never divorced from their source, and that Mimic Vat essentially has a serial number for its triggered ability, and will only make copies of things with that serial number. My interpretation of the rules is incorrect; though it might make sense in English, it does not make sense in Magicese.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 2

    posted a message on Random Card of the Final Day: Maelstrom Nexus
    Quote from tstorm823 »
    Surrak Dragonclaw

    I like this guy, but he let me down big time once. Flash in EOT, surprise attack a planeswalker controlled by a player without enough toughness in play to stop 6 trample power... get's chump blocked. Doesn't have trample. I don't know if I lost the game, but I lost in my mind.
    I saw this in the Gru's Plan meme format.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 2

    posted a message on Random Card of the Final Day: Maelstrom Nexus
    IMO, this is not as bad as it's made out to be, here.

    Obviously the aggressive cast and equip cost are countered by the need for a board investment. That doesn't make it worthless, and it's fairly possible for it to have some serious bonuses even without comboing with Enchanted Evening.

    I would strongly consider playing this in Estrid, Heliod, and realistically any other Enchantress deck.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 1

    posted a message on What Card Do You Wish You Owned for a Deck?
    Quote from Weebo »
    It's pretty admirable that you'd hold your trump cards back until your meta can scale to meet them, I must say. It's frustrating being thumped by someone who clearly has more expendable income and a vast collection to draw from when you don't have the same resources.
    It's honestly not as much fun to play like that. It's also the reason I'm a strong supporter of proxies - I want to play things like duals and Moat because I own them, but I don't want people at the table feeling like they're out of the game because they don't want to or are unable to spend that much on cardstock. That's even more true with current card prices. I would never be able to have the collection I have if I had started in the last couple years.

    For me, I think that's partly because the fun is in the actual journey, not the destination (win or loss). I have a reasonable collection now, but still missed the end of reserved edition by a year or two, and bowed out of the game for a few years prior to Urza's block. Clearly, my timing is impeccable. Either way I still don't like handing a beating downwards; whatever I'm playing I try to make it an even fight where I can.
    +1 with what Weebo said. It's no fun when someone gets shut down because you threw a wallet at them. Some stuff is fine because it's not excessively powerful like Telekinesis or Argivian Archaeologist, but other stuff does not have any reasonable analogues and are gamebreaking.

    It was less about disposable income and more about timing for me. I got back into Magic in 2008 and rabidly bought all the singles I ever wanted. At some point, I realized that I had better buy the reserved list cards I wanted, because they would be unavailable later; case and point, when Gray Merchant of Asphodel was spoiled, I went out and bought my one copy of Invoke Prejudice (for $35, moderately played)... since 'devotion to black' was a mechanic, I had some serious suspicion that 'devotion to blue' would also be a mechanic. No surprise later, by Born of the Gods, it was $150, and has never come back down. In hindsight, I was probably wrong about the reason for the spike ('Devotion to blue' appears on precious few cards).
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 1

    posted a message on [Deck] Reanimator
    Quote from The Fluff »
    I am a former legacy player who moved to modern, but still sometimes visit the threads here for pleasant nostalgia. Smile

    Looking at the latest pages of discussion. Noticed that no one seems to be using Jin-Gitaxias Core Augur. Is he not good enough for this deck anymore?


    Same, but mostly EDH. I want to get into Modern, but haven't had the time.

    I think Jin hasn't seen real play since Griselbrand was printed. I remember initially that people were running a couple of each, but eventually lists were just 4 Griselbrand, utility targets, and no Jins. The reasoning (when I was playing) was that if your opponent has Karakas already out or a Swords to Plowshares ready that you don't have a counter for, Griselbrand still has a game-winning impact, where Jin probably does nothing.

    He just kind of got out-powered by Griselbrand, I think.
    Posted in: Combo
  • 3

    posted a message on What Card Do You Wish You Owned for a Deck?
    I own most of what I would want (Timetwister, OG English Mana Crypt, The Abyss, a singleton set of duals, etc.), but there are cards that soared out of reach. Tabernacle, Mishra's Workshop, Bazaar of Baghdad, and Moat are probably the top ones.

    <rant> Magic prices mostly make me super sad. I play with people who are like, 5-10 years younger than me, and it bothers me that they won't be able to play a lot of cards that I really enjoy. I realize a lot of it is nostalgia for me, but, some of it is also having a level playing field. When Mana Drain was spoiled in Iconic Masters, some of my friends were so stoked, and I thought to myself "Oh, I can dust off my copy now that they have access." When I first played it, they had to look at it; they had never even seen a Legends Mana Drain. There are so many cards that are, for all practical purposes, out of reach; I have singleton copies of All Hallows Eve, Eureka, Invoke Prejudice; lots of cards that are now between $250 and $500, but for reasonable purposes, no one wants to pay $200+ for a card, even if it has fairly unique functionality. My ceiling has historically been around $250, and I felt that was extreme for a casual player. Even relatively replaceable garbage like Jihad and Mirror Universe are so expensive now. </rant>
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 1

    posted a message on Random Card of the Day - HIATUS
    More like Crapbasket, amirite?
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • 1

    posted a message on Harvest Season
    A friend of mine plays it in Wort, the Raidmother. It's pretty wild.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.