2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on MTG Gatherer Extractor v7.3b (Database & Pics Assistant)
    First, I love this program. Second, I don't know if it was mentioned already or not, but if you use PHPMyAdmin to import the .sql file then you must first edit it (I used notepad++) or the foreign names will attempt to enter as plain text and not as characters (for non-Roman lettering names). Basically I added "character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci". I changed these lines. (Lines 31-41 in my file).


    Nback_id text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_CN text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_TW text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_FR text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_DE text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_IT text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_JP text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_PT text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_RU text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_ES text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,
    Nname_KO text character set utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci,


    Without this the foreign text shows as a bunch of question marks. (specifically the Asian card names). I think I changed more than was necessary, but wanted to point this out in case it helps anyone else.
    Posted in: Third Party Products
  • posted a message on Land Tax Discussion
    Of course you don't want to take out balance, the card is ****ing broken in half. Same reason you don't *want* to take out time vault, mox ruby, wheel of fortune, etc. etc. all of those cards are pretty broken. Just because a card is a personal favorite of yours doesn't mean it's going to be great in a given format. I absolutely adore psionic gift and other random commons but said cards constructed applications are nonexistant.

    Lotus vale is still not going to see legacy play. One wasteland activation makes you cry quite hard. You can have all those lands in your hand, if you can't play spells you aren't winning a game of magic I can tell you that much.

    I hope land tax is selling for too much money on site at GP Atlanta so I can unload mine at inflated prices. It would be great to get some money for a card that is going to end up at 10-15 before the year is out.


    What I meant by that comment was that I'm actually ok with taking Mox Ruby and Wheel of fortune out of the deck. There are other moxen//mana sources for example with land tax mox diamond is very useful. Giving your opponent a new hand with wheel can also end the game for you, so it's a risky play that I'm also ok with removing. Balance on the other hand hurts the deck to take out, because it's super useful and has no real equivalent in the format.

    I agree with you that by the end of the year land tax will be at $10-12, but not because it's unplayable, but rather because it focuses on a different strategy that not everyone enjoys. It was also printed through 4th and no card in 4th deserves the price land tax recently acquired. A parfait deck should be a budget deck anyway, sort of like Affinity, but with control. Edit: Let's put it this way: Does land tax deserve the price of Jace the Mind Sculptor, a playable card that was printed only once and at mythic rarity? No. Does Land Tax deserve the price of Sylvan Library, a card also printed in Legends and 4th (and 5th)? Probably. Oh and yes on the day it was unbanned, my Land Taxes were worth more than my friend's Jaces - At least according to e-bay and TCG Player.

    And finally +1 to Lotus Vale being a bad card.
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on Land Tax Discussion
    Try playing the card in legacy. See what happens. You durdle around for approximately 15 turns assuming you survive 15 turns and then you start to get an advantage. I wouldn't actually care if I faced land tax in a tournament, as the card is actually terrible due to powercreep. Sure back in 1998 I'm sure tax rack was a nuts engine. But today? The opponent will sneak in a griselbrand and destroy you. Or reanimate it. Or do something that actually does things, as all land tax gets are basic lands. Life from the loam is superior to land tax and how much play does loam see outside aggro loam and lands.dec? Loam is a 1-2 of at best in green decks not built to utilize the card to its fullest. And do you see lands or aggro loam putting up a lot of results currently? No, because loam is a very durdly card that does nothing to prevent an aberration from repeatedly swinging at you. And the card advantage it provides is nothing compared to griselbrand. But really, this post says it all:

    Land tax is back. Reaction: Who cares?

    ^^The joke is, land tax could have been unbanned 4 years ago and it would have done next to nothing. 4 years later, it gets unbanned, and isn't breaking anything. Just like metalworker, grim monolith, dream halls, and illusionary mask the card is, simply put, not that good anymore.

    Now if balance was unbanned, there would be a reckoning. As it stands, land tax will be a niche card in legacy at best or it will be a card used in the control mirror. The card just isn't that strong.


    Making a statement that Balance is better than land tax, while true does not make automatically land tax bad. Not everyone is going to play land tax, and it will not warp the format, but it is one of my personal favorites, and still a solid card. I still run it in Vintage. It's not my only vintage deck, and I'm now seriously considering trying to port it over to legacy. The one card I don't want to take out is Balance, but the deck can survive without it, there just isn't really a legacy equivalent. But rather than debate whether or not it's good I'd rather see a discussion of cards that might make the deck plausible.

    My current deck list is:

    1 Balance
    1 Blood Moon
    4 Devastating Dreams
    2 Disenchant
    2 Enlightened Tutor
    2 Feldon's Cane
    4 Gamble
    4 Land Tax
    1 Leyline of Sanctity
    4 Lightning Bolt
    1 Lotus Petal
    4 Mox Diamond
    1 Mox Ruby
    2 Path to Exile
    1 Scroll Rack
    2 Seismic Assault
    1 Solitary Confinement
    2 Swords to Plowshares
    1 Wheel of Fortune
    2 Zuran Orb
    Spells [42]

    10 Mountain
    8 Plains
    Lands [18]

    SIDEBOARD
    2 Blood Moon
    1 Disenchant
    2 Leyline of Sanctity
    4 Red Elemental Blast
    2 Shatterstorm
    1 Solitary Confinement
    1 Stranglehold
    2 Tormod's Crypt

    on the 29th only three of these cards will not be legacy legal. Yes the deck has a problem with Chalice for 1, which is why one open space will probably be filled with a disenchant. 2 spaces are left. One could be a lotus petal (a poor substitute for a mox but useful none the less) and the other could be a board sweeper like Wrath of God or a second Scroll Rack (since I personally only run one)

    Other cards I've ran in the past with the tax include
    Island Sanctuary
    chain lightning
    firestorm
    library of leng
    ivory tower

    I've also considered running these but either don't have them or they didn't quite make the cut.
    wheel of sun and moon
    sacred mesa
    planar birth
    replenish
    the tabernacle at pendrell vale
    Moat
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on [SCD] Cavern of Souls
    I like this a lot. EDH will love it, I want one for Kaalia. Type 2 multi-colored Angels also seems plausible, and there are plenty of ways to flicker it and reset it to what you need.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on [[Official]] General Discussion of the Official Multiplayer Banlist
    I understand it's brokenness. I do use it, and enjoy playing it. Which is why I think it should be legal in EDH. :p
    Posted in: Commander Rules Discussion Forum
  • posted a message on [[Official]] General Discussion of the Official Multiplayer Banlist
    I'm going to change the subject here a little bit and say that I don't think Balance should be banned. Yes, it's good, and easy to break but not so broken that it deserves a ban.

    Does it singlehandedly win games - No.
    Can it be countered - Yes.

    It's readily available, as it's only playable in type 1, and was printed up to fourth edition. I've seen them in the $1 bin at my local store. They are a staple of vintage mono-white control, a fun card that is versatile. It levels the playing field which doesn't necessary mean you win, but can help keep you from dying, and gives you a chance to come back from a bad spot. Commander to me is about playing older cards that you don't always get to play otherwise. Balance definitely fits that description.
    Posted in: Commander Rules Discussion Forum
  • posted a message on Vintage Staple Discussion Thread
    It's been a while since I've played Vintage with anyone except 1-2 friends, but last time I was playing at the card shop in small tourneys was around Mirrodin (the first one) and well these cards were kinda important.

    white:
    Land Tax
    Moat
    Disenchant
    Island Sanctuary

    Multi Colored
    Vindicate

    Red
    Chain Lightning
    Price of Progress
    Gorilla Shaman (aka Mox Monkey)

    Black
    Sinkhole
    Posted in: Vintage (Type 1)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.