2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on The new mana wording and various cards.
    As I mentioned, they're only removing it from mana abilities because it's unnecessary clutter. This doesn't mean they're removing its mention from all cards.

    Cards like these, which directly care about what's in your mana pool, will still utilize the word mana pool, just as the only card which cares about state-based actions is also the only card to actually mention state based actions.

    Mana pool is still a mechanic, and it is still going to be a word that is used on cards. It just isn't on mana abilities, unless there is some specific interaction with the mana pool.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 2

    posted a message on The new mana wording and various cards.
    It shouldn't change at all, from my understanding. The 'Mana Pool' is still a mechanic in MTG, they just removed its direct mention from mana abilities because it's fairly unnecessary clutter on the card, and also has a tendency to confuse new players.

    It's like how the only time in MTG when state-based actions are ever directly mentioned is on Rules Lawyer. They still exist whenever you're playing the game, but cards only need to directly acknowledge it as a mechanic when it's being directly manipulated.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 2

    posted a message on Two Identical Masters 25 Boxes - Same rare and mythic slots on two boxes except for literally one card
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1btKaGDB3JQ

    Rudy from Alpha Investments just did this box opening.

    Watch the whole thing, or just skip to around the 20 minute mark to see everything laid out. Literally the only difference between the two is that the second box had a Jace instead of Center of the Sea (although the second box still got a Center of the Sea as a foil.)

    Is this stupid luck, a quality control issue, because they were part of the same case?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 2

    posted a message on ADDENDUM TO APRIL 24, 2017 BANNED AND RESTRICTED ANNOUNCEMENT
    Views along the lines of "This is bad because they didn't do it 3 days ago" are jaded and pointless. If you disagree with the ban in general, fine, but if that's your reasoning then you don't have a real opinion, you just like complaining about wizards.

    Now, onto opinions that can actually be discussed. Banning Cat is IMO the best thing they could have done for the format. No, this isn't going to result in the format being only Mardu Vehicles and maybe BG. The only reason that other decks didn't exist is because Saheeli is so oppressive when pitted against anything that isn't Mardu Vehicles. Other decks were able to beat Mardu fine, it's literally just that Mardu was the only one who could consistently beat Saheeli.

    Now that Saheeli is gone, things like Temur Marvel, Temur Tower, Energy, actual control decks, and the plethora of possiblity from Amonkhet will top. Is Mardu still the best deck in the format? Probably. But you can side against it properly, and it doesn't prevent tier 2 decks from existing.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • 5

    posted a message on Fall 2017 set named Ixalan & changes to pro tour schedule
    Quote from Dio »
    "Ixalan is just a rename of Atlazan" are you ******* kidding me. Just admit you were wrong. I don't know how you could have gotten that Atlazan was a Meso-American world when they only showed a merfolk when most people thought it was referencing Atlantis. Just seems like you're in denial. If the name of the actual set wasn't Atlazan then clearly Atlazan is a fake set, don't know why this is so hard to follow.


    Hey friendo wanna chill
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Grixis Cartouche Control
    The new Bolas walker isn't confirmed for Amonkhet. It's quite likely that he's in Hour of Devastation, since some leaked pack art had bolas on the front.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • 3

    posted a message on New Pilot Program - Standard Showdowns (Kaladesh)
    Quote from GlavTech »
    Standard is in a fine place right now, especially for those that are competitive minded. If you don't like the competitive mindset, play a casual format.
    So what you're saying is that Standard, THE entry level format for most new players, should cater to super-competitive cutthroat Spikes? That is the most backwards nonesense I've heard all week.


    Standard has more competitive events than all other formats. Your opinion might be that it's an entry level format, but your opinion also doesn't change facts. Standard has the most competitive events by a long shot, so therefore I think it's fair to have events like this cater to spikes.

    You're complaining about the premiere competitive format being played competitively. THAT is backwards nonsense my friend.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • 2

    posted a message on New Pilot Program - Standard Showdowns (Kaladesh)
    I see no problem with establishing a Spike focused/competitive minded Standard event that isn't PPTQ.

    If you want to win the packs, play competitively. If you don't care about playing competitively, just play FNM. If you don't like FNM, then you're going to complain about any standard event that exists, so your complaint about this doesn't really mean much.

    Standard is in a fine place right now, especially for those that are competitive minded. If you don't like the competitive mindset, play a casual format.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.