2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Atemsis + Ping damage
    Atemsis is enchanted by Psionic gift. Player A taps them to deal damage to Player B. Player B in response destroys Atemsis.

    I know the damage will still go through, but will Atemsis's ability still work?

    Using card tags is mandatory in the Magic Rulings forum. Please check your private messages to learn how to use them. I've added them for this post.
    -MadMage
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on Mothership Spoilers September 8 - Zada and a demo...er...eldrazi.
    Theoretical musings.

    Say I control Zada here and 20 Kobolds of Kher Keep. If I cast Forked Bolt, choosing to deal damage only to Zada, will I copy Forked Bolt 20 times? Can I then choose to target the Kobold and an enemy player with one damage apiece from each copy?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Vial and Tidehollow sculler and Flickerwisp
    Not quite. Here's how that would play out.

    Tidehollow Sculler enters the battlefield, puts its trigger on the stack.
    You cheat in Flickerwisp with Aether Vial, targeting Sculler and putting its trigger on the stack.

    Resolving, Flickerwisp removes Sculler from the game until end of turn.
    Then Sculler resolves, revealing your opponent's hand where you pick Card A to be exiled.

    At end of turn, Flickerwisp's effect brings back Sculler, who upon entering pits its effect on the stack again. Barring any other plays, it resolves and you choose Card B to be exiled.

    Note, that Card A is basically permanently exiled at this point. The Sculler the effect was tied to left the field already before its effect resolved, so the return trigger can now never happen. Card B however can be returned if the new Sculler leaves the battlefield.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Think they'll make a monoblue Kiora?
    Alright, I'm going to take a stab at justifying her greenyness. Logical stretches and assumptions ahoy.

    She witnessed the Eldrazi ravage and consume the plane in short order, with little being able to slow them down. She seeks the largest, most powerful creatures she thinks can be used to oppose them; mythical sea monsters. The fact she's using traditionally Blue critters to do it doesn't matter, fighting to restore and preserve the natural order of Zendikar is a solidly Green motivation.

    It's interesting that she chose Theros to inhabit. She's learned that the 'Gods' of her home (Ula, Cosi, and Emeria) were false, they were actually vastly powerful alien parasites mistaken for deities. To stay so long on a plane defined by their reverence of Gods may hint at some other intention, perhaps to expose a potentially threatening pantheon before something equally devastating happens. If that's the case, I would classify wanting to let life continue without the potentially catastrophic interference of false gods as a decently Green motivation.
    (Could be argue for Red too though, if you worded it differently.)

    I could stretch further and assume more, but I'll admit that second one is pretty thin. Regardless, one's motivations should be taken into account when determining a flavor color identity, not just actions and means.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Chances of certain counterspells being reprinted?
    Blue is getting Force of Will back, and the other colors getting colorshifted prints as well.
    White - Strength of Spirit
    Green - Might of Instinct
    Red - Power of Conviction
    Black - Cult of Personality
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Bolt and Planeswalkers
    As a note, you can however destroy said planeswalker before they have a chance to activate the ability, say in their Upkeep.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [COMM]the other Tax Commanders
    Esper commander is a Merfolk with "Other Merfolk get +x/+x where X is the amount of mana paid"

    Or so I hope.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Council of the Pearl Trident
    Quote from Xyx
    If you really want an Esper commander that can also be played in mono-Blue, then one way to go about it would be to give it a UUU mana cost but abilities with W and B in the text. That still gives it an Esper color identity.


    "You may pay U instead of B or W to pay for the costs of merfolk Spells you cast or to activate the effects of merfolk creatures you control."

    Feels a little like cheating XD lets try it on for size.

    Council of the Pearl Trident UUU
    Legendary Creature - Merfolk [M]
    0/0
    Islandwalk

    Council of the Pearl Trident enters the battlefield with a +1/+1 counter on it, plus an additional +1/+1 counter for each Legendary Merfolk creature in your graveyard.

    Other merfolk creatures you control get +1/+1 for each +1/+1 counter on Council of the Pearl Trident.

    Discard another Legendary Merfolk: Double the number of +1/+1 counters on Council of the Pearl Trident.

    You may pay U instead of B or W to pay for the costs of merfolk Spells you cast or to activate the effects of merfolk creatures you control

    Getting awful wordy...
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on Council of the Pearl Trident
    Yeah, I guess I shouldn't have tagged it Grandeur. Just seemed more... Regal.
    As for a keyword, I was worried about pushing it too hard at 3 cmc. If one were included, Flying or Islandwalk would be the obvious picks.
    The mana cost is weird. Just preferred it to tagging it with some funky activated abilities or rules text saying "Look at me I'm black and white!" Guess UWB would have been wiser, but I wanted it to feel more blue than black or white.
    What about (W/B)UU? Or Maybe I could push it a little more and make it WBUU.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on Council of the Pearl Trident
    Council of the Pearl Trident (U/B)(U/W)U
    Legendary Creature - Merfolk [M]
    0/0
    Council of the Pearl Trident enters the battlefield with a +1/+1 counter on it, plus an additional +1/+1 counter for each Legendary Merfolk creature in your graveyard.

    Other merfolk creatures you control get +1/+1 for each +1/+1 counter on Council of the Pearl Trident.

    Grandeur - Discard another Legendary Merfolk: Double the number of +1/+1 counters on Council of the Pearl Trident.

    Why?
    Obviously, I loves me my fish.
    Also, Merfolk need an esper color commander to play with all of their toys at once. They also really like their lords, so its a super lord. I kept it generic rather than a specific fish to represent the combined might of each legend who 'joins the council' through Grandeur. There's plenty of merfolk legends too. The grave clause helps it justify being black, and keeps it relevant even after you ditch your legends only to have it destroyed.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on Dragons maze Guildgates hidden message HELP!
    http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=502038

    What's been done already, plus speculation.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on So this art still exists.
    Quote from MOON-E
    This doesn't really look like a simic card beyond the fact it's blue and fish-like. It just doesn't fit in with the rest of the simic creatures (especially since it breathes lightning), and in general doesn't look like magic art.

    EDIT: To be more specific, it looks a bit too edgy to be simic. Simic has a lot of curves to it, it's creatures are covered in smooth skin, shells, or scales. This creature is jagged with sharp scales, it doesn't really match the simic's style.


    I disagree on this not being simic based on its aesthetics. It's a Dragon with Butterfly wings on its face and watery tendrils all over its body. If this were a card, it would fit most at home with Simic. The only competitor is Izzet based on the lightning, and the multi-creature splice is more compelling imo.

    That said, I do not think this is card art at all. It would look a bit awkward cropped to a magic sized art frames well as not really meshing all that well with the style we've had through Ravnica already
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Lucent Liminid in Theros?
    If anything returns from Future Sight, I'd want it to be Grandeur. It's such a cool way to make 4 of legendary not a bad thing.

    With an apparent focus on gods, it would make sense too. What's more legendary or grandiose than a god?
    On the flipside, Wizards really has a thing for Commander right now and grandeur is a decidedly poor mechanic to promote that.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Guild partnerships for Dragon's Maze?
    Quote from VenomMoth
    Wasn't something mentioned about Split cards?


    God, I hope not.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.