2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Masterpieces
    That Tezzeret is gorgeous. Really want him, Jace and Bolas. Never will own them though because to hell with those prices. Really disgusted with how Wizards has been doing things lately and the secondhand market isn't helping.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Kid almost beat to death over tos
    This is definitely something that happened.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Fblthp feels like an absolute waste as a rare in WAR
    This is a pretty major set story-wise, so why then do they use a rare slot on a running joke character? Why is he even in the set to begin with? Mechanically he feels..odd, like I don't get how the first effect really ties in with him at all, the second at least is somewhat worthwhile as far as flavor goes. I'm sure most people don't care, they're just happy that he finally got a card, but this really feels like something that should have been in a supplemental set or something, where they usually stick characters like this. I mean, they literally took a non-character from some flavor text and made him a full blown rare legend in one of the biggest even sets the game's ever had. Like, really? But again, this is probably falling on deaf ears because "omg hahaha, they actually made a Fblthp card!"
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 2

    posted a message on Censorship in the art?
    Wow, I didn't even realize how fat they made the new Radha in comparison to the original :/
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Censorship in the art?
    I mean, this is the same community that complained about Triumph of Ferocity but had zero issues with Triumph of Cruelty and don't you dare say anything against the agenda push the industry (this, movies, comics, games, etc.) has been getting.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Lazav, the Multifarious
    Quote from SnowBunny »
    Quote from genesys »
    I don't think it's busted, but it's a nice build-around card.

    I see it as a cheap, better Morphling, if built around. With a Slippery Bogle, Slither Blade, and Hunted Horror in your graveyard, you have a:

    Lazav, the Graveling UB
    Creature - Shapeshifter
    1: ~ has hexproof.
    1: ~ can't be blocked.
    2: ~ becomes a 7/7
    1/3

    I'm sure that better Gatherer searchers and other formats will see better stuff (like the Dreadnought).

    I think that what sells this cards is: it's VERY cheap, and the ability is instant-speed.


    Put Vector Asp and Phyrexian Dreadnaught in your yard and he turns into an instant kill


    You keep saying that and I am left wondering if you actually read the dang card.

    If you change it into Dreadnaught it no longer has infect.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Promos: Vampiric Tutor & Nin, the Pain Artist
    The Masters art for Tutor is sooooo much better.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Deathrite Shaman and Gitaxian probe banned in legacy no other changes
    I am so done with bull***** from WotC man. I wouldn't necessarily it kills it, but this is such a huge blow to one of my favorite decks of all time (Manaless Dredge). Absolutely pissed.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on So, Pelakka Wurm is a rare...
    Yeah, yeah, I know the argument "he's way too good at uncommon for limited", I get that.

    Here's the counterpoint, how about they just, you know, not reprint it at all in the set? I mean, it's certainly not a card people were fighting tooth and nail to get a reprint, right? Is it really so necessary that this format have Pelakka Wurm in it? Couldn't they have just..made something new or different for that spot?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Why the animosity towards bringing up old threads?
    I get if someone is just bumping old, dead threads and not really adding anything new to the discussion or something like that, but I saw a necro'd thread that was recently locked and the mod simply posted saying that if you want to continue the discussion to post a new thread instead of digging up an old one.

    Ummm, why? If there is already a thread on the subject, one that's already some discussion in it, why not just continue to use that than just add another thread about the exact same thing?
    Posted in: Community Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.