Makes your creatures into noncreature enchantments seems like potentially a lot of fun and extremely abusable - Swift Reconfiguration was the efficient way, now we have the command zone way. Doesn't seem quite as brutal and braindead like Yarok, the Desecrated but it does seem like fun.
For 5 mana i would agree too, for 7 seems a little underhwelming
So basically you gobble up with everything wotc come up with and hate everything non-wotc? Sounds like a totally reasonable and not biased point of view. Wotc brought us ton of crap too.
The cards showed so far have a very mtg-like art style. They have reasonable mechanics. They don't feel out of place at all, especially after wotc esperimenting with different designs like they did with New Capenna and Neon Kamigawa.
The set is baldurs gate and doing a gate theme is... adorable. I hate it. Fire everyone involved. There's obviously going to be at least 9 gates for that one maniac in draft or sealed or whatever to run a deck with this nine fingers person.
Like what you are betting on is that wizards is so bad at making their own game that they're going to miss the opportunity to allow for this and print a legendary commander in a commander draft set that can't actually use their own abilities. There's no evidence they're that stupid here like 50 expansions into this game.
Bro limited and commander are two different things. Pretty sure they'll make a gimmick like "there is a 50% to find a common gate instead of a basic land in every pack" and that will work. For limited. Making a gate themed commander sultai deck is a completely different thing.
Willing to bet that "wizards is bad at making their own game" regarding commander because they did it plenty of times.
Bold assumption when this is a tiny fraction of the set leaked and it already shows new gates being printed. There couldnt possibly be even more gates in the set. No way. Please share with the rest of us the entire set reveal you clearly have access to.
It's also a bold assumption that they will print more. You also have only seen a tiny fraction of the set, but somehow your intuition is better than mine?
I have seen 2 cards of the same gate cycle, the rare land cycle is already taken by the battlebond lands, there are no reason to assume there will be more than 1 cycle.
Should really not have the "Once per turn" , then it would be an amazing card for decks that have lots of sacrifice to chain into some stuff.
Works decent with Evoke and other mechanics thats put large stuff into play for free, but the once per turn just severely limits what its allowed to do.
It's just a 3 mana card. It can't generate the value you are asking for.
I don't get the worship of wotc's bad decisions. Happened with ugly slivers too.
Amazing Spiderman's Electro fans aren't many, and even then they have vedalkens. No need to ruin cephalids too.
It's rounded down, so i don't get the hype for the discard ability. I mean it's a good ability, but it's not broken. If i have three cards in hand i only need to discard one.
For 5 mana i would agree too, for 7 seems a little underhwelming
So basically you gobble up with everything wotc come up with and hate everything non-wotc? Sounds like a totally reasonable and not biased point of view. Wotc brought us ton of crap too.
The cards showed so far have a very mtg-like art style. They have reasonable mechanics. They don't feel out of place at all, especially after wotc esperimenting with different designs like they did with New Capenna and Neon Kamigawa.
Happened with marath, will of the wild in 2013 too
Other choices are good, can't wait to see the cards
Bro limited and commander are two different things. Pretty sure they'll make a gimmick like "there is a 50% to find a common gate instead of a basic land in every pack" and that will work. For limited. Making a gate themed commander sultai deck is a completely different thing.
Willing to bet that "wizards is bad at making their own game" regarding commander because they did it plenty of times.
It's also a bold assumption that they will print more. You also have only seen a tiny fraction of the set, but somehow your intuition is better than mine?
I have seen 2 cards of the same gate cycle, the rare land cycle is already taken by the battlebond lands, there are no reason to assume there will be more than 1 cycle.
This could work and be nice, but i don't think wotc will do it
It's just a 3 mana card. It can't generate the value you are asking for.
It's not, you'll only get to 7. Even if they print a couple of "colorless" gates, having only 9 in a deck of 100 cards is pitiful and won't work.
Sadly half of the abilities are worthless on a 1/1
I don't get the worship of wotc's bad decisions. Happened with ugly slivers too.
Amazing Spiderman's Electro fans aren't many, and even then they have vedalkens. No need to ruin cephalids too.