we spent 4 pages discussing if the wording alowed to cast 2 creatures with haste or to cast only one with haste ( and only using the whole 2 generated by it)
people try to find errors in the wording but magic is made soo that all thing are intuitive ( only trying hard you may find a erro)
Well exactly... I'm not trying to find an error. It's clear that the intention was that this was never intended to have any infinite combo application (aside from Sage of Hours), and that's very clearly represented in the wording. It seems as everyone else is trying to find an error in the grammar to make infinite combo possible, but that's clearly not there.
man
i will make it easy:
For each planeswalker you control,
(this ability (the chain veil's ability) will kind of create a copy of the next ability(after the ,) on the stack for each planeswalker you control.)
you may activate one of its loyalty abilities
You may activate the ability while the chain veil's ability is on the stack.
once this turn
soo that you don't activate the abilities to infinitum... oo
as though none of its loyalty abilities had been activated this turn.
to get over the rule
606.3. A player may activate a loyalty ability of a permanent he or she controls any time he or she has priority and the stack is empty during a main phase of his or her turn, but only if no player has previously activated a loyalty ability of that permanent that turn. #
there we go
say your counter prouf trying to ilude people and making me wrong
but this is how the ability works.
I'm not going to bother arguing about this since you obviously convinced yourself you're right. I just can't wait to say I told you so when there's an official ruling (although a level 3 judge already contradicted you on this).
man i may be wrong but i will need more than "you are wrong" or "this don't work" as a prouf if for you this is ok then ok ...
we spent 4 pages discussing if the wording alowed to cast 2 creatures with haste or to cast only one with haste ( and only using the whole 2 generated by it)
people try to find errors in the wording but magic is made soo that all thing are intuitive ( only trying hard you may find a erro)
Well exactly... I'm not trying to find an error. It's clear that the intention was that this was never intended to have any infinite combo application (aside from Sage of Hours), and that's very clearly represented in the wording. It seems as everyone else is trying to find an error in the grammar to make infinite combo possible, but that's clearly not there.
man
i will make it easy:
For each planeswalker you control,
(this ability (the chain veil's ability) will kind of create a copy of the next ability(after the ,) on the stack for each planeswalker you control.)
you may activate one of its loyalty abilities
You may activate the ability while the chain veil's ability is on the stack.
once this turn
soo that you don't activate the abilities to infinitum... oo
as though none of its loyalty abilities had been activated this turn.
to get over the rule
606.3. A player may activate a loyalty ability of a permanent he or she controls any time he or she has priority and the stack is empty during a main phase of his or her turn, but only if no player has previously activated a loyalty ability of that permanent that turn. #
there we go
say your counter prouf trying to ilude people and making me wrong
but this is how the ability works.
I'm not going to bother arguing about this since you obviously convinced yourself you're right. I just can't wait to say I told you so when there's an official ruling (although a level 3 judge already contradicted you on this).
we spent 4 pages discussing if the wording alowed to cast 2 creatures with haste or to cast only one with haste ( and only using the whole 2 generated by it)
people try to find errors in the wording but magic is made soo that all thing are intuitive ( only trying hard you may find a erro)
Well exactly... I'm not trying to find an error. It's clear that the intention was that this was never intended to have any infinite combo application (aside from Sage of Hours), and that's very clearly represented in the wording. It seems as everyone else is trying to find an error in the grammar to make infinite combo possible, but that's clearly not there.
man
i will make it easy:
For each planeswalker you control,
(this ability (the chain veil's ability) will kind of create a copy of the next ability(after the ,) on the stack for each planeswalker you control.)
you may activate one of its loyalty abilities
You may activate the ability while the chain veil's ability is on the stack.
once this turn
soo that you don't activate the abilities to infinitum... oo
as though none of its loyalty abilities had been activated this turn.
to get over the rule
606.3. A player may activate a loyalty ability of a permanent he or she controls any time he or she has priority and the stack is empty during a main phase of his or her turn, but only if no player has previously activated a loyalty ability of that permanent that turn. #
there we go
say your counter prouf trying to ilude people and making me wrong
but this is how the ability works.
I'm not going to bother arguing about this since you obviously convinced yourself you're right. I just can't wait to say I told you so when there's an official ruling (although a level 3 judge already contradicted you on this).
Kurkesh / Angelic Accord / Bubbling Cauldron / Trading Post / Goblin Rabblemaster / Goblin Kaboomist?
You can even Play Hall of Triumph to save Goblin Kaboomist from his own mines (when you aren't sacing them to Post).
Hoarding Dragon also says 'sup.
THE SYNERGY. MY BODY IS READY.
Also, Pithing Needle is a legitimately main-deckable card that costs 1.
EDIT: Turns out this is legit. So this is kind of broken... How many artifacts in standard cost 1? Many.
All layed out here.
I'm not going to bother arguing about this since you obviously convinced yourself you're right. I just can't wait to say I told you so when there's an official ruling (although a level 3 judge already contradicted you on this).
I'm not going to bother arguing about this since you obviously convinced yourself you're right. I just can't wait to say I told you so when there's an official ruling (although a level 3 judge already contradicted you on this).