Also, I think it's important to remember that for many (most?) players, the expected cost of playing a particular Limited format is important primarily because it determines how much of it they can play.
If something is costing me $10 per event after winnings and card sales are take into account, chances are I won't be playing many of those. Whereas if something's costing me $1 per event (or less!) I'll most likely be playing whenever I have free time if the format's fun.
That's hardly a value-obsessed, no-fun mindset. I want to play more Magic!
1
1
1
God, I hope not. I wouldn't wish that kind of bureaucracy on any volunteer here.
1
http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=476079
I thought I would generate a little more exposure on this new change. This is handy for people who post their draftcaps in videos.
I suggest we have a community implied rule that embedded draftcaps be wrapped in spoiler tags.
1
1
1
1
1
1
This thread isn't an analysis of his draft. He didn't post a draft cap, and took down the 8-4, nuff said.
I placed 2nd last weekend with a RWb tokens/two drops deck sporting two goblin rallys and 3 dynacharge, two Auger Spree splashed.