2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    Quote from Timba »
    Quote from BbearZ »
    My initial interpretations of Hexdrinker and Barkhide Troll were incorrect. We should definitely test them out. We have to either cut lands or Steel Leaf Champion or a mixture of both for them though.

    Also Veil of Summer is an auto include as a 2-3 of in the sideboard- maybe 4 of. The only reason not to is your specific meta doesn't have blue or black.
    I dont see Veil of Summer as great card in theory. Whats its ceiling? You 2-for-1 them, saving one of your janky creatures. Im not sure such card advantage is even good vs decks that want to grind, grinding is their game, they will outplay you if you give them time. Not to mention you have hexproof, pumps, undying and regeneration, so another hexproof can be superfluous. Its floor being a blank card you cant use, because blue and black decks dont pack much removal and counterspells these days. Overall I think thats a weak sideboard card. If I want to grind Id be happier with Kitchen Finks, aside from 2-1 it can deal damage and kill planeswalkers, more synergic with our pumps and gains life. Also not only applicable vs blue and black.



    Well considering you don't want to use Vines on their turn, Veil is really friggin good if it saves your pressure/creature and replaces itself. There are so many applications where you can sequence them to misuse their removal/spells/abilities. Have you guys literally read, you and your permanents gain hexproof until the end of turn from u and b and spells can't be countered too? It also stops Cryptic and possibly draws you a card. Like what more do you want...

    I don't know about you but Kitchen Finks is kind of not good right now. Especially when Burn decks don't swing as much now with the inclusion of Light up the Stage and Skewer the Critics. It simply doesn't do enough of anything. It also doesn't block Phoenix and swings for 3 for a 3 drop. You seem like a fan but honestly... its not even a jack of all trades because it doesn't do anything decent in this meta.

    If you are asking to side in more threats like Kitchen Finks over Vei- sorry but please stop disappointing me.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    In regards to the guy who is arguing we are pretenders or delusional, there not being a place for optimizing this deck, and this is a "turd" deck. (Yea not going back to look up your name) I don't think anyone is pretending. People who play this deck know its strengths and weaknesses. We know how good it is and can be. We are not pretending to optimize this list. We are doing it. We want to play the best deck we can. What kind of logic is "the deck isn't tier 1 so you shouldn't try"... Then tell that 90% of the Established Modern section of this forum.

    I think the only pretender is you. You have branded us as spikes and mentioned disparaging comments against budget only players in the past. However I believe the intentions of these comments were not against the players but the notion to refuse to try and optimize. Why can't we do both? By allowing us to try and play and discuss Mono Green Stompy and make it the best it can be while still having budget options. I don't see why that's bad at all or pointless. How can you pretend to try and call us Spikes and exclusive when we have been inclusive of budget options. You cannot say the same after you have bashed our intentions several times discourteously while muttering "but you can play what you like" in the end. Please try to see your hypocrisy. Mention we have a "spike exclusive mentality or get out" but you have the reverse "budget only mentality or get out".

    You have literally said nothing new in your ramblings. I don't have to remind you, adding fetches to the this deck still makes it pretty dang budget in Modern. If you are so fervently stuck on budget, I'd suggest you not play Steel Leaf Champion either because it is at a nice 5 dollars a pop which is probably more expensive than half the deck if you are playing budget.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • 2

    posted a message on Stompy
    @XmalkuthX
    I just like playing Mono Green and Aggro so that's why I play this deck. I don't understand why you sound so offended when I ask that there be an optimized version. I would definitely list a budget version as well but why deter people trying to make a better list? There's plenty of diversity in Modern and being tier 3 is still viable.

    Who isn't admitting this deck is a cheap deck? I don't know... You make so many straw man arguments, I don't know if they are rhetorical or if I should respond to them. No one is saying this is the best aggro deck in Modern. Why would offering an optimized list make no sense? It makes sense to add the fetches, I literally provided a bunch of evidence on why while you have gone "boo hoo I don't want to spend money on my turd." Also splashing colors is fine as well, I just like Mono Green, there's a splash list on the primer. I don't know man. You sound like you are just rambling. Even if you buy the fetches, this deck is still going to cost you less than most competitive standard decks...

    @MagicYio
    I like full art Dungroves. No Dismembers because I like my Dungroves and play 12 one drops. Depending on the list, there are only around 4 creatures that turn Rhonas on without any additional pumping assuming they survive. Just really not worth the investment imo
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • 5

    posted a message on Stompy
    State of Stompy 0.0.1

    Long time ***** poster here. I've been wanting to post a guide of sorts for a while now. I have my share of criticisms and perhaps haven't addressed them correctly in the past. Here is an attempt to get a chain of posts going to hopefully provide some insight to other players.

    Hot Takes Hopefully Settled

    Which 3 drop?
    With Dominaria's release, the deck will be getting probably the strongest inclusion since probably Avatar of the Resolute in Steel Leaf Champion. If there is some debate whether or not it replaces Leatherback Baloth, there shouldn't be. It is hands down better. It can't be blocked by Mana Dorks, Lingering Soul Tokens, Snapcaster, Most of the Humans deck, Baral/Goblin E, Etched Champion/most of the Affinity, etc. etc. It also trades with Tasigur and Gurmag Angler. The extra power is much better than the toughness because this is an aggro deck and you do want to accelerate the clock.

    Play Fetches for Narnam?/Budget Discussion
    The answer is yes. There should be no discussion if this deck should stick to budget or not. If you can play better cards or build a better list, go for it, you do not need to adhere to any budget restrictions. If you can spare around $200 dollars for a playset of Windswept Hearth and Wooded Foothills,it would significantly improve this deck for Narnam Renegade. Narnam Renegade makes E1 better, Rancor better, pump spells better, and helps with the curve as well. The deathtouch helps against some problems in the past like early goyfs/Tasigur/angler. Even with the fetches, this deck would still be considered budget relative to most modern decks. Getting these fetches also opens avenues for other modern decks as well. If you would like to improve your decklist and collection, I would highly recommend you invest in fetches. Oh yea, Narnam should be a staple for this deck unless you want to run a CoCo/Splash build.

    Importance of Dryad Militant
    Some people are trying out CoCo builds, for this to be happen, you need to cut some cards. It should not be Dryad Militant. I am going to disagree with some minor points in the main post. Dryad Militant is not a flex card and Kessig Prowler is a not going to make your list. You cut E1 and Narnam before Dryad Militant because Militant is so strong against Jund, Control, Pyromancer, and Storm.

    Rhonas is a Staple?
    With Steel Leaf Champion being released, the 3 drop slot is just so stacked and its going to be your least played slot. You need to pick your cards wisely and Rhonas the Indomitable can be really good in some situations and completely blank in some others. I am honestly not a fan of a card like this but I can definitely see it in some lists but it's not what I define as a staple. A staple should be a card that is played generally without special circumstances. Rhonas is a flex slot card and we have quite a few in our 3 slot like Dungrove Elder, Groundbreaker, and Boggart Ram-Gang.

    All in all, I hope you find some of this helpful and if you disagree, feel free to let me know.

    Here is the list I prefer:




    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    Why are you even running 4 drops with 18 lands.... I really don't know why I keep asking these questions..... At this point they are just why.....
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    Okay. You have "literally" used dictionary definitions of these words. But. But but but, you have actually provided a decent argument this time but it really hinges that these words are black and white definitions based on an online dictionary search. Life isn't an online dictionary search. Go outside and meet people, find out whether or not they are actually bad people rather than internet arm chair judge them. But I am impressed though. You have provided an argument to follow and it's not bad. Congratulacions!

    Here is something to consider: Words or Language are mere tools we use to communicate. Their meaning changes over time based on what's useful.

    Sarcasm is a literary device to convey irony to mock people. That sounds right. But it is very commonly used for jovial humor by the same mechanism except with different intentions. You seem to be unable to define sarcasm in this context without the malicious contempt but it can and does exist without it. You are interpreting this definition of sarcasm- something you agreed you could not do. Sarcasm exists without the intent to express contempt. Is it possible for him to be jovial? Perhaps unlikely, but not impossible. He says this is how he communicates then you just kind of take it as is. And you can reference his previous post which perhaps was condescending but you are still interpreting this contempt.

    We already agreed you cannot interpret emotions or intent from text. He could have been condescending or jovial. It really doesn't matter.

    But EY YOOOOOO you actually "asked for opinions" on Yisan.

    Also since you really love to google definitions.

    "Secondly i never suggested Yisan. I asked for opinions on it. "

    Suggest by definition is to put something forward for consideration.

    It kind of sounds like you were asking our consideration or opinions on it. But I don't know anything about that.

    Leaving this thread for a long while. I apologize to anyone actually trying to discuss this deck even though I don't think there's much to discuss right now. Have fun with your cardboard yall.
    Infraction issued for flaming. --CavalryWolfPack
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Established
  • 2

    posted a message on Stompy
    Quote from ccc1522 »
    Exhibit A of my case and point. lol
    What case? This makes no sense. I don't understand this at all. You try to take the moral high ground by branding his sarcasm as condescending but he mentions the notion that you should try and consider your own foul reaction- you just go "got em." Is this some 6D chess I cannot understand? Sure the guy could have been more productive explaining why Yisan has no place in this deck but he makes a fair statement "communicating in sarcasm is just normal where he's from and he might not have been condescending." Nothing changes what you said though. You straight up insult him and try to shame him for something he might have done. What case have you proved other than you are immature and short-sighted. How the heck is Cirnu warned but you haven't received a worse punishment.

    I can go on about how even asking about Yisan in this deck is just sad but I don't know- I feel just with what I've said- I'd be labeled the stompy thread douche- not that I haven't been already labeled that anyways.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Established
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy


    Take out tap lands. Add lands. Add some more lands.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Established
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    I love me some Groundbreaker but you definitely want to run more land(which most of you don't) if you want to utilize it properly. Having the option to Vines/B Defense/Aspect with Grouundbreaker is great but you need the mana base to set that up first. Also I feel some number of to Collected Company should be played with Groundbreaker as well.

    Rhonas's Last Stand is also not what this deck needs. I'm sure it's good enough to find a place in some lists but it doesn't offer anything better than current options considering the draw back. I don't think we can expect the new creatures to get much stronger P/T wise or rather they won't get bigger than they already are without considerable draw backs. What I want and I reasonably think is viable with the constraints of balanced card design is new creatures with comparable P/T but with extra utility such as haste or more recently Narnam Renegade's counter/death touch. You know- Trample/Vigilance some synergy with other cards- something extra. I want it to more easily triggered because as good as Narnam Renegade is for me, I prefer not to run fetchlands and can definitely understand why some people won't use the newer build with Renegades/Fetches over older builds.

    That being said, I really don't know where to go with this deck. In Modern, every deck has a bad match up- it's just some decks have more ability do something about it. Due to just being a straight forward aggro deck in a color that lacks sideboard silver bullets- Mono Green Stompy just doesn't have the agency to fight against bad match ups. I think going forward- other colors need to be considered and if it means cutting what some perceive as vital mono green stompy cards then that's a decision you have to make. It's a similar environment with Naya Zoo/Naya Burn, although it's more definitive what is what, there is still some gray area. If you want to splash green for some slower more resilient threats/removal/sideboard tech or red for bolt, try it out. In my opinion, don't worry about staying stompy or not. Try out cards you like or think will be good. Just understand that the current state of Mono Green Stompy is very limited in what it is able to do.

    Some extra bit (since I feel like posting today)
    The current bad match ups:

    Affinity- Green actually has an okay sideboard for this match up but this deck has been good for almost all of modern's history despite the great sideboard hate available. Our mainboard has no way to race or control so we are really betting on our opponent's drawing terribly or play even more terribly. There are so many cards you don't want to see; Cranial Plating, Etched Champion, Vault Skirge, Arcbound Ravager, Steel Overseer, Master of Etherium- heck even Signal Pest is good against us.

    Elves- Again our lack of removal is really bad. They have the chump blockers to usually live to get the overrun if we don't get some nut draw or something. Our sideboard for this is even worse since it's either more Dismembers or Prey Upon which is usually not enough.

    Tron Variants- Both traditional tron and eldrazi tron just suck for us. We aren't reliably fast enough to beat them down before they can just play a big spell that beats us down. Eldrazi Tron is a little different but still has the tools to just be a nightmare. Again we want them to just draw poorly or misplay as our saving grace.

    A lot of other match ups that may be tough can get a lot easier with experience and skill. While the ones above- there isn't much we can do other than play our best and hope your opponent draws poorly.




    Posted in: Modern Archives - Established
  • 1

    posted a message on Stompy
    Death's Shadow is actually a fine match up. Life management on that level is still very new for some players. You see very quickly who is actually good with the deck. They are playing the better deck still but I have no problems with it. I welcome the Death Shadow match up. I don't understand the preying upon uninteractive decks comment- Our best match ups are fair decks...
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Established
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.