2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Cranial Insertion: Pop Quiz!
    THE only right answer to this whole article is the letter E from Q4 "Forty-two" imo.

    Great article, only missed one Question XD
    Posted in: Articles
  • posted a message on January 2008 FCC Winner- Absolutionis
    Quote from hotgoat
    It is a bit redundant to have two costs like this, why would you want to pay 3 if you have 1 mana option. It may have been templeted of Crystal Shard, but that artifact is really only good with blue mana.

    Maybe the 1 mana option could have been pay one life, this adds a bit of tension to the activation.


    See i was thinking like you on this one until Faerie Lord explained it to me. It goes along this line

    Venser's Ambulator - 5 mana
    Legendary Artifact
    3 mana : Remove target creature you control from the game. At the end of turn, return that card to play under its owner’s control.
    :1mana:, tap symbol : Remove target creature you control from the game. At the end of turn, return that card to play under its owner’s control.

    Grandeur — Discard another card named Venser’s Ambulator: Destroy all artifacts and creatures. They can’t be regenerated.
    It took an instant for Venser to vanish. It took an instant for Oleg il-Dal to stare at the detonating powerstones.

    So if you had 4 mana open you can get 2 creatures you control RFG (1 via "high activation" cost and one by "cheap + tap" activation cost) and the use the grandeur ability so that by the end of turn you get them back, the more mana you have to spend the better this card gets with your creatures.

    Hope that helps.
    Posted in: Card of the Month
  • posted a message on January 2008 FCC Winner- Absolutionis
    Thnx Faerie Lord, crystal clear now. The way it's worded i thought you HAD to tap it for either cost hehe. I guess i just wasn't thinking properly.
    Posted in: Card of the Month
  • posted a message on January 2008 FCC Winner- Absolutionis
    Can anybody enlight me on why this card has 2 activation costs? like it might be just because i'm looking at it at 1 am but i just..don't get that part.

    Other than that i do like the card all around. Congrats on the win man.
    Posted in: Card of the Month
  • posted a message on [SHM] NOT A Graveyard or Artifact Theme...
    Quote from RedRascal
    Phosphoresant Feast and Mistmeadow Skulk in a "mana cost" block. Double Down - CLANK!



    Spellwild Ouphe revolving "mana cost" and "auras" into 1 single card (you know enchanting your creature for less but removal being cheaper on him as well). Plus it does have those eyes kinda like Mistmeadow Skulk regarding as how that is widely accepted as being "in" the set. Maybe creatures in this sort of "mirror" world had to adapt their eyes since it's all based around shadows.

    Yes i know it might be too far fetched but hey it's just an idea... besides it's 12:45 am haha.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Jon Finkel is BACK!
    Quote from ExHumus
    Not only that, but he went 3-0, 3-0, 3-1 through the top 8.

    he wen't 3-0, 3-1, 3-1 on the top 8 Wink

    Edit: And yeah i was all giddy watching all the games, never saw him play LIVE and now with his status it was very impressive for me to know that this was THE best player just tapping the cards to the red zone. Grin
    Posted in: News
  • posted a message on Reduction costs
    k guys thanks for the help! Much appretiated.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Reduction costs
    Say that i have Nightscape Familiar in play, and i want to play Crosis, the Purger. How much mana do i need to pay to play Crosis, 2UBR or 1UBR??
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Someone in MTGO's auction room was saying...
    Quote from Jaxal1 »
    And what was the UB power uncommon?

    Probably Psychic Drain IMO
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [GP] Three new cards from the Magic Beckett
    I agree with Guesswork too. With all of the above mentioned all that i have left to say is that, people is making their own judgment about that single card and not the izzet guild as a whole. That often happens to people, they start to "see" what the card cannot do instead of what it really does.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Rav Ads
    Sorry if this doesn't belong here, but i don't seem to find the ravnica ads links anywhere on this site. When i go to playravnica.com, I can't watch the other 10 or so ads so if anyone has the links please help me.
    Thnx in advance.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on [RAV] Firemane Angel image
    I think this is rather a publicity movement being held by woct, to "catch the eye" of players that don't use mtg.com
    We had the preview of Char in tcgplayer.com. though.

    And yeah the angel was HOT without the card frame and now looks HOTTER THAN HELL itself!!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [RAV] Firemane Angel image



    From Starcitygames.com here is the full Firemane Angel Card!!!
    Discuss.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Guess the Cropped Card Art (official)
    Finally!!!! Number 90 is: Heroism
    Posted in: Other Forum Games
  • posted a message on Number of Pre-cons in Ravnica?
    Or they might push the extra theme deck for a mono colored one, one of the colors that it doesn't represent the guilds of the block?
    Posted in: Speculation
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.