-
- Etched Chester
- Registered User
-
Member for 13 years, 1 month, and 13 days
Last active Sun, Apr, 19 2015 07:55:29
- 26 Followers
- 2,153 Total Posts
- 73 Thanks
-
Dec 3, 20121
Blutsau posted a message on [[Official]] Proposed Merger of Casual Forum and OOCFYes, mondu, they were.Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats
Quote from zeromdi think its a good idea
but i dont get the new structure, can you or someone put in that format to me get the tree ?
today:
Casual Magic
- Articles
- Primers
- Multiplayer
- Pauper / Peasant
- Homebrew & Variant Formats
the new tree will be
"Casual & Related Formats"
- ?
- ?
- ?
Something like this (order might change):
"[Casual's new name]"
- Extended
- Primers
- Multiplayer
- Pauper / Peasant
- Homebrew & Variant Formats [possibly new name, to reflect the inclusion of Vanguard, Archenemy & Planechase] -
Sep 27, 20121
Macius posted a message on GMAD #294 - Zombie ApocalypseIts all fine....Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats
I just want to be able to do my card when time rolls around....
its the first one ive actually remembered I wanted to do...
-
Sep 26, 20121
TheBlueMuzzy posted a message on GMAD #294 - Zombie Apocalypsei'm not sure how you do it, but i was the third person to add something, yet i was 14th on the list.Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
1
1
1
1
I'm going to fall back on the "casual is different" justification. When I have issued warnings, I have not seen anyone with a lengthy infraction history.
Let's say I need to issue a warning for spam. As I issue the warning, I notice that the person in question received a warning for spamming 60 days ago. It's not a big deal. He/she gets another warning.
Now, if I see that person has (exaggeration) 15, 20, 30, etc. warnings for spam in the past, I might think differently--especially if those all happened in the same forum. With all those warnings, shouldn't he/she know better by now? Again, it hasn't come up for me. However, a person who has a lot of flaming infractions in the past, or who has been suspended for flaming, etc. might deserve more than a warning the next time he/she flames someone. Consider that warnings are reminders, and one can only be reminded so many times.
That's not abuse of power. It's a judgement call that requires more thought than your run-o-the-mill warning. I can understand user infraction history mattering in some of our forums.
I reiterate my previous point: different forums require different methods of moderation.
2
1
1
1
1