I wasn't actually doing that with the Bluesould vote though. That was just to end the day. Seemed like it was going to happen anyway. But now it doesn't and that's okay, he wasn't my most suspicious.
DIggy: if you can "confirm" yourself, is there a reason not too?
I'm well aware of the playing style on mafiascum, and I'm not prepared to tolerate its spread onto this site. As townies we can either provide explanations, or fall under suspicion, and risk lynching.
Do I have to say I don't agree with that?
Sometimes not giving a long-winded "explanation" for a vote can tell you more, can get better reactions, and reveal more scums. You guys just aren't giving it a chance. Everyone all so "oh my god, he didn't explain his vote! He's scumzorrrrr!!!!!" I think it's the mafia who do that the most though--easy way for them to try to blend in and sound "townish."
Also, Puzzle, when I said everybody could claim, I was being sarcastic.
I don't really care about Bluesoul. I want the day to friggin end. People will talk and talk and talk, but no one knows anything yet. Not until some people get lynched and other people get killed. That's the name of the game.
Endless day ones drive me nuts.
That said, I didn't even realize Diggy wasa voting for Bluesoul, which means he's less likely to be mafia just for that reason.
unvote
At a certain point it's all just hot air. Unless everyone wants to claim now.
1. diggy: no content. no original thoughts. Agreeing with lots of people even when they are voting different people. Lurky.
2. TWS: #527 = WTF? I don't care if you vote someone, but to cast suspicion on someone and say you think they're likely town at the same time?
3. um, Machin Shin? Defensive. Retreated fast from accusations I seem to recall.
Sorry folks, real life sucks sometimes. I'm trying to catch up.
Bluesoul: did you say you "see" anyone who targets you, and you don't "have" to use your role-block if you don't want to?
Twomz: if he isn't lying, and someone not revealing the mafia ability to kill at night would show up as a "lie", then the game is won by mass claim right now.
Which makes me think he's lying or the mafia kill is not an ability that shows up as a lie. I'm leaning towards his ability just doesn't detect mafia kill ability.
diggy has not expressed an original thought all game. sorry, have to keep up the diggy pressure. can't do a pbpA right now.
Bluesoul: what if 2 people target you? You get a list of "names" and have to pick one? You "block" both? You block one, but the other one affects you?
How could that work in the day? The Mod. tells you you've been targeted and then, you decide if you want to react, and then the Mod. tells you who it was?
I don't understand how that works. And yes it could be scummy. Particularly with you basically threatening to lynch anyone who tries to confirm it.
Does no one else see what I'm talking about with diggy? Are you gona make me do a PBPA? GOd that would suck.
I love the smell of fresh hypocricy in the morning.
I'll say this now, and I'l keep saying it until some people get it. IT IS NOT SCUMMY TO BE AGGRESSIVE. IT IS NOT SCUMMY TO NOT EXPLAIN IN EXCRUCIATING DETAIL EVERY REASON FOR EVERY STUPID VOTE YOU CAST EVERY SINGLE FRIGGIN' TIME.
I am voting for whoever seems scumiest TO ME at the moment, or for whatever other reasons I might have but don't feel like explaining.
I voted for Twomz and am still voting for him because (1) he was trying to get people to say if they were in Hitchhikers or other books from his first post (2) he came up with that stupid truth-or-dare idea (3) he seemed overly certain that Kenji was confirmed innocent when the only info we had at that point came from a computer tha Mod told us we couldn't trust (4) he hasn't said anything but a role-name, and despite what some people seems to think, a role-name does not = innocent. I don't even understand the logic some people are using ion that one. "hey slartibartfast wouldn't have any reason to steal the heart of gold, he must be innocent!" (5) he has hinted (yes, crypticly) at least three times that he knows something about the set-up of this game that a townie would be unlikely to know, and also doesn't seem to make sense (6) he is now voting for me.
That said, he hasn't been quite as big a hypocrite as some others, for example:
Vote: diggy
As yogi berra once said, it's de ja vu all over again.
Do I have to explain that one?
DIggy: if you can "confirm" yourself, is there a reason not too?
Do I have to say I don't agree with that?
Sometimes not giving a long-winded "explanation" for a vote can tell you more, can get better reactions, and reveal more scums. You guys just aren't giving it a chance. Everyone all so "oh my god, he didn't explain his vote! He's scumzorrrrr!!!!!" I think it's the mafia who do that the most though--easy way for them to try to blend in and sound "townish."
Also, Puzzle, when I said everybody could claim, I was being sarcastic.
Endless day ones drive me nuts.
That said, I didn't even realize Diggy wasa voting for Bluesoul, which means he's less likely to be mafia just for that reason.
unvote
At a certain point it's all just hot air. Unless everyone wants to claim now.
Vote: Bluesoul
I can't even understand half of what Puzzle says.
Also, reckless vigging plans don't seems to work very well from what I've seen (LoTR, Dollar, and Random II come to mind).
Yes? That's a weird question.
1. diggy: no content. no original thoughts. Agreeing with lots of people even when they are voting different people. Lurky.
2. TWS: #527 = WTF? I don't care if you vote someone, but to cast suspicion on someone and say you think they're likely town at the same time?
3. um, Machin Shin? Defensive. Retreated fast from accusations I seem to recall.
Bluesoul: did you say you "see" anyone who targets you, and you don't "have" to use your role-block if you don't want to?
Twomz: if he isn't lying, and someone not revealing the mafia ability to kill at night would show up as a "lie", then the game is won by mass claim right now.
Which makes me think he's lying or the mafia kill is not an ability that shows up as a lie. I'm leaning towards his ability just doesn't detect mafia kill ability.
diggy has not expressed an original thought all game. sorry, have to keep up the diggy pressure. can't do a pbpA right now.
How could that work in the day? The Mod. tells you you've been targeted and then, you decide if you want to react, and then the Mod. tells you who it was?
I don't understand how that works. And yes it could be scummy. Particularly with you basically threatening to lynch anyone who tries to confirm it.
Does no one else see what I'm talking about with diggy? Are you gona make me do a PBPA? GOd that would suck.
I'll say this now, and I'l keep saying it until some people get it. IT IS NOT SCUMMY TO BE AGGRESSIVE. IT IS NOT SCUMMY TO NOT EXPLAIN IN EXCRUCIATING DETAIL EVERY REASON FOR EVERY STUPID VOTE YOU CAST EVERY SINGLE FRIGGIN' TIME.
I am voting for whoever seems scumiest TO ME at the moment, or for whatever other reasons I might have but don't feel like explaining.
I voted for Twomz and am still voting for him because (1) he was trying to get people to say if they were in Hitchhikers or other books from his first post (2) he came up with that stupid truth-or-dare idea (3) he seemed overly certain that Kenji was confirmed innocent when the only info we had at that point came from a computer tha Mod told us we couldn't trust (4) he hasn't said anything but a role-name, and despite what some people seems to think, a role-name does not = innocent. I don't even understand the logic some people are using ion that one. "hey slartibartfast wouldn't have any reason to steal the heart of gold, he must be innocent!" (5) he has hinted (yes, crypticly) at least three times that he knows something about the set-up of this game that a townie would be unlikely to know, and also doesn't seem to make sense (6) he is now voting for me.
That said, he hasn't been quite as big a hypocrite as some others, for example:
Vote: diggy
As yogi berra once said, it's de ja vu all over again.