- Macius
- Registered User
-
Member for 13 years, 3 months, and 3 days
Last active Mon, Jan, 22 2018 13:37:05
- 25 Followers
- 9,476 Total Posts
- 190 Thanks
-
Feb 3, 2014Macius posted a message on Launch Giveaway!Vicious Shadows- because of my EDH deck, this card with Dovescape and Elesh Norn has won me many a game.Posted in: Announcements
-
Nov 6, 2012Macius posted a message on Stonebrow edh in progress....I didnt even know you commented... have to make sure to fix that on my end.Posted in: Macius Blog
I'll look in a minute now that I see it. -
Apr 7, 2012Macius posted a message on A rant about spellmorphI dont see anything wrong with your idea. And don't all abilities break a rule of magic (Haste breaks the "summoning sickness" rules.), so whats wrong with created abilities breaking the rules if they seem intuitive or the like?Posted in: Repository of Creative stuff
-
Mar 9, 2011Macius posted a message on Funny quotesisnt jace 2.0 a $100?Posted in: Surging Chaos's Realm of Ruination
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
This is why I chose this card as I feel it tests how ingenious you can be in breaking the parity of it in the end. In the above deck, who cares about 4 damage and 4 lands, if you're left with a 7/7 and your opponent has no lands.
On a personal note for Wurmcoil, and I like staying hands off so im not going to do anything, I feel its actually a nice fit into a Wildfire deck as it lives through a Wildfire and even if its killed (opponent bolts it in response to a Fire), you're still left with creatures post Fire.
By the title of this thread, some of you may of guessed what card I want to build around. For those who haven't, let me introduce you to one of my favorite cards: Wildfire.
So, what do we notice about this card?
Seeing as the type of person I am: No budget, Legacy Ban list, No Stuffy Doll (I like to break the parity other ways.)
That said, please follow the GMaD Rules- explain why you wish to add or remove a card.
I say we add 3 Life From The Loam. 3 because we only really need one to do what we need it to do and we dont need it in our opening hand.
4 Earth Surge
Creatures (4):
4 Sylvan Advocate
Spells (7):
4 Exploration
3 Rude Awakening
3 Life from the Loam
4 Hissing Quagmire
4 Treetop Village
3 Creeping Tar Pit
19 couldabeen Mutavault
The new Hellion probably is meh for now, but if a couple energy producers find their way into the deck/ Aether Revolt gives us a goodie, then I could see it being viable at some point.
But the effect is, is that you shouldnt cut the fetchlands just because they non-bo with one card in this case now. You're not going to have every game where you land Ankh/Zo-zu everytime on curve. But by virtue of using them, you now have the option to get more activations out of Grim Lavamancer without having to potentially eat a spell for Exquisite Firecraft.
I think a card that deserves more talk about being cut, if im looking at the right list, is Lava Hounds. Yes its a hasty 4/4, but its 4 life no matter what you do.
When messing around, I take a list (like yours) and play it for a bit, tweaking things until I feel like I've reached a happy point, and then I tear it down and move on to the next idea.
I dont know why, but im not really liking the new Nissa as much in here. Her + is nice, and regrowth effects on a body are cool, but by the time we can ult her, wouldnt it be closer to where we arent playing as many lands.
Im also soft on Daretti, but he makes blockers that you can turn into removal which you can turn into getting something nasty of an opponents, so thats seemingly fine.