If you think jd is Scum, how is this not lylo? He should have two votes tomorrow.
I'm not charging today, so my double vote won't be active tomorrow, I do have one more shot of my vote move.
However as scum may have a double shot night 4 extrapolating from d_V's claim, we have to either lynch one of scum today or no lynch and lynch the double shot scum tomorrow.
As that second option is longer odds than the first, I think we are effectively at lylo.
I'm pro mass claim but would rather not go first.
My bad, totally missed the sarcasm there, reading comprehension for the win.
If scum has a double shot, why would they also get my 2 x move vote / double vote.
That would be an extremely unbalanced.
unvote
If a no lynch isn't safe today then we need to figure out who to lynch today. However I'm currently leaning against a mass claim, if D_V was doctored I don't want to out them.
@ISO: You advocated for my lynch at the tail end of day 2, any chance that scum might have NK'd me disappeared with your statements. You were setting up my lynch before the day had began, is that not chaining a lynch?
I don't really think Tordeck counts for that. This is clearly a bad plan. The scum have a charging second kill because they tried to use it on me last night.
Explain this D_V, No lynch goes from solid town play, to clearly a bad plan in the space of 2 posts.
Strawmanning is when you take one point of a person's argument and make the entire argument about that one point.
No it's not, it's when you present a different position, the strawman, and attack that position. The different position may be similar but it ultimately different.
For example: I said earlier in the game quantity of posts does not equal scumhunting, Mindreaver revised the statement to quality is better than quantity, and criticized me for attacking hunger who had a low post count but quality posts.
I'm on holiday in Australia for 1 week, have wifi access but my posting frequency will be less.
We are in mylo and it's my fault, I was convinced mindreaver was scum and took the opportunity to take him out, No lynch is the right option today.
@Rhand: It's wasn't a one time thing, I choose not to charge today but still have a move vote.
@Iso: I dislike that fact you proposed a chained lynch, this is a scum tell. By you aren't losing this game do you mean you are gonna lynch me and win.
Also you bring up a triple voting SK role to prove I could be scum, that's an entirely different role, also I still have my vote.
Finally:
Yeah, quite a move. Can't wait to see how that shakes out. But if he's got another "move vote" shot and is scum, you guys just lost.
I do have another move vote, and I can't believe you are still pushing for me to be scum. If I was scum I would have tried to survive another day and then control the vote everyday until scumteam won.
I'm convinced you are scum, your vague threatening tone, the slip and all your behaviour day 2.
Until I see the flip I'm not gonna change my mind.
I probably shouldn't have done his work for him, but I was interested in getting some answers out of you.
Why didn't you answer Hunger's question?
Why did Tom and Huntz no longer form part of your scum team?
To be fair you flipped from "Why would you lynch JD?" to voting me because iso did.
Hunger called you on it and then you lumped him into your scum team, instead of responding to the point.
That scum team was myself, hunger and tordeck, with no mention of huntz or tom, both of whom, you were pushing as scum earlier on.
So you have being inconsistent.
That said I'm not sure consistency is a good thing, reads change in the light of new information and changing reads is something town is willing to do.
Feeling the need to maintain consistency to avoid questioning is something I can see coming from a scum mindset.
@Mindreaver:
I like said I thought I had posted about Porph before my bike ride.
Also I just came across his kpaca quote in my reread, where he essentially soft claimed vig, if we had had more time to reread before deadline after his full false claim maybe we could have gone no lynch instead but what's done is done no point dwelling on it.
@KJ: Do you remember proph threatening to vig shot you?
Damn, my post when astray this morning and have been biking for the last 6 hours, I decided I was anti a proph lynch.
Anyway after proph full claim, I thought about his charging and it didn't make sense. Why would PGO N1 = Vig Day 2.
I think he lied about his role and he would have died if targetted by any ability night 1. I think this is why he looked sketchy, because he was lying from the outset to try day 2.
I'm not charging today, so my double vote won't be active tomorrow, I do have one more shot of my vote move.
However as scum may have a double shot night 4 extrapolating from d_V's claim, we have to either lynch one of scum today or no lynch and lynch the double shot scum tomorrow.
As that second option is longer odds than the first, I think we are effectively at lylo.
I'm pro mass claim but would rather not go first.
If scum has a double shot, why would they also get my 2 x move vote / double vote.
That would be an extremely unbalanced.
unvote
If a no lynch isn't safe today then we need to figure out who to lynch today. However I'm currently leaning against a mass claim, if D_V was doctored I don't want to out them.
Explain this D_V, No lynch goes from solid town play, to clearly a bad plan in the space of 2 posts.
No it's not, it's when you present a different position, the strawman, and attack that position. The different position may be similar but it ultimately different.
For example: I said earlier in the game quantity of posts does not equal scumhunting, Mindreaver revised the statement to quality is better than quantity, and criticized me for attacking hunger who had a low post count but quality posts.
@Rhand: Obviously in favor of no lynch.
We are in mylo and it's my fault, I was convinced mindreaver was scum and took the opportunity to take him out, No lynch is the right option today.
@Rhand: It's wasn't a one time thing, I choose not to charge today but still have a move vote.
@Iso: I dislike that fact you proposed a chained lynch, this is a scum tell. By you aren't losing this game do you mean you are gonna lynch me and win.
Also you bring up a triple voting SK role to prove I could be scum, that's an entirely different role, also I still have my vote.
Finally:
Vote No Lynch
votecount
I do have another move vote, and I can't believe you are still pushing for me to be scum. If I was scum I would have tried to survive another day and then control the vote everyday until scumteam won.
I'm convinced you are scum, your vague threatening tone, the slip and all your behaviour day 2.
Until I see the flip I'm not gonna change my mind.
unvote, vote Mindreaver
Why didn't you answer Hunger's question?
Why did Tom and Huntz no longer form part of your scum team?
Hunger called you on it and then you lumped him into your scum team, instead of responding to the point.
That scum team was myself, hunger and tordeck, with no mention of huntz or tom, both of whom, you were pushing as scum earlier on.
So you have being inconsistent.
That said I'm not sure consistency is a good thing, reads change in the light of new information and changing reads is something town is willing to do.
Feeling the need to maintain consistency to avoid questioning is something I can see coming from a scum mindset.
@Mindreaver:
I like said I thought I had posted about Porph before my bike ride.
Also I just came across his kpaca quote in my reread, where he essentially soft claimed vig, if we had had more time to reread before deadline after his full false claim maybe we could have gone no lynch instead but what's done is done no point dwelling on it.
@KJ: Do you remember proph threatening to vig shot you?
Rereading day 1. Votes stays on atogaholic until I see content from him.
Anyway after proph full claim, I thought about his charging and it didn't make sense. Why would PGO N1 = Vig Day 2.
I think he lied about his role and he would have died if targetted by any ability night 1. I think this is why he looked sketchy, because he was lying from the outset to try day 2.
I would have preferred no lynch to proph lynch.