Yah no offense to the artist on A, but hes skinny and kinda geeky looking, and also it seems like hes dooing the cha-cha or some other crazy dance. Whereas the fat one just looks plain badass, and his huge mouth for eating goes along with the fact that he has to eat a critter each turn.
... As far as troll being in i coulda told you that much may back when week 3 voteing began, i mean really was htere any doubt in your minds?
I definately think this is simac, i mean the whole theme of the guild is medically mutateing and enhanceing wildlife to return ravinca to a natural state. This this is a good example. and to those of you who don't think it feels blue enugh, think beast from ons rolled in with levithan.
Of course going through the expansions and re-releasing them on mtgo may not be something i care about, but it will have a slight effect on my magic playing becuse you see some texts and creturte types from these sets will be re-worded and therefore will have a small but interestiong effect on the people that still play with these older cards in real life. Wether it be vintage, legacy or just casual this attention to re-digitizeing hte old sets hurts no one.
Considering he's one of the guild leaders, he will most likely have a cc of 8 like sisters, rizia, sezdek and chourus. Some thing like 4RRGG. Also i would not be surprised if he isnet even bigger like around 8/8 with a sizeable bloobthirst and trample. Just in comparisin to the other leaders if he isn't that efficint he wont be nearly the bomb that the others are. Anyhow a 8/8 trample for 4RRGG is kinda normal in green and with legendary i should hope hes at least that big with a huge bloodthirst...
Also the problems they might be referring to had something to do with their unnwillingness to go thrugh some of the steps to this card due to innapropreate card art and mechanic relation. You may have all noticed that this ymtc took alot longer than the other two, with fewer steps involved.
laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame.
As paper cards are very light so it means that MTG cards are worthless?:p
A single magic card is light but alot of them get real heavy like idk... 3 booster boxes, which is probably the amount ill be getting, no thanks to this add but i think i had some help in determining wether i liked this set or not *wink wink*.
The need to switch this over to red is pretty obvious. Red loves to do risky burn or unstable affects. and blue well its not supposed to do burn at all this is a textbook example of how the color roles have changed over the years, but if you look at the origional cards in magic the color roles werent realy well defined... you had green with overcosted creatures, blue with burn, and black with damage prevention whats up with that?
. . . . . . . .
Anyhow i think this card is nice and the art is awsome, there are littel bits of fire igniteing his hair
Wow, that is some nasty artwork. I thought that we were past the crappy anime art. It sucks that that is probably one of the cool Angels, which could have had some kickass artwork. I say fire that artist on the spot. We don't need this kind of crap in MTG, especially if it's taking up what could have been a beautiful Firemane Angel.
Not an angel, it is pretty clear to see that it is a mage of some sort like perhaps the boros guildmage?
That is not necicarrilay true either... it was posted as overgrown tomb along with the "sacred foundery" wich was obviously not the sacred foundry and more like something for the radokos cult. Thus its credability goes way down, as of right now we dont know what those land arts were from or if they were even used as art in this set (they very possibly could just be concep seketces) so i think we should stick to arts we are absoulutely positive we know what they are.
Im not shure what the dryad pic is so your guess is as good as mine.
...
and for the wurm i see were that could be a problem, but mocking the wrong art to the wrong card might cause confusion... not that theres anyone on this fourum dumb enugh to get confused that way
... As far as troll being in i coulda told you that much may back when week 3 voteing began, i mean really was htere any doubt in your minds?
... oh wait jitte... oh wait skullclamp...
but still i figure they at least learn form some past mistakes. ;p
Edit: lol 69...
... Cool, and you know im for anything that irks the blue mage ;p
And yet you will... we all will cuse Ravinca is soo deliciously good I still can't wait :xd:
A single magic card is light but alot of them get real heavy like idk... 3 booster boxes, which is probably the amount ill be getting, no thanks to this add but i think i had some help in determining wether i liked this set or not *wink wink*.
. . . . . . . .
Anyhow i think this card is nice and the art is awsome, there are littel bits of fire igniteing his hair
. . . . . . .
A annoying fat guy i would rather not be reminded of.
Not an angel, it is pretty clear to see that it is a mage of some sort like perhaps the boros guildmage?
That is not necicarrilay true either... it was posted as overgrown tomb along with the "sacred foundery" wich was obviously not the sacred foundry and more like something for the radokos cult. Thus its credability goes way down, as of right now we dont know what those land arts were from or if they were even used as art in this set (they very possibly could just be concep seketces) so i think we should stick to arts we are absoulutely positive we know what they are.
...
and for the wurm i see were that could be a problem, but mocking the wrong art to the wrong card might cause confusion... not that theres anyone on this fourum dumb enugh to get confused that way