There is a lot of ****ing potential for this release. So many neat/expensive/sought after lands that arent on the reserve list.
I, mean sure, they are going to throw in a good amount of unplayable ****e lands into here because, y'know, it's Wizards. But It should still be fun to see what makes teh cut.
I guess an issue is that, yes, while MTG is growing and Legacy is getting more players, It's growth has distinct limits. Legacy is held down by card scarcity.
I was referring to online singles prices. Demand shouldn't increase the price of Digital Objects with a potentially infinite supply (zero cost to create).
One complaint I have about MTGO is the cost. MTGO is nearly as expensive as paper magic.
This does not make sense. Why is there an arbitrary scarity in digital objects? I would be so much more willing to play MTGO if it were actually cheaper, but some cards (namely the staples) are even more expensive than their paper counterparts.
I, mean sure, they are going to throw in a good amount of unplayable ****e lands into here because, y'know, it's Wizards. But It should still be fun to see what makes teh cut.
I'm betting on Quicksand
animu girl land!
Maybe im overvaluing him his effectiveness.
also, i don't see Aquitect's Will making the cut maindeck. i'd rather have counters.
I don't even know If i has room for anymore lords in my Mermaids deck...
ID : mahou_shoujo
There aren't enough dual lands for everyone.
SUSPEND WORLDFIRE, SUSPEND Kozilek, Butcher of Truth/OTHER FATTY
Wait a few turns, profit. It's simple really. Elegant.
BORKEN?!?! Who can say.
This does not make sense. Why is there an arbitrary scarity in digital objects? I would be so much more willing to play MTGO if it were actually cheaper, but some cards (namely the staples) are even more expensive than their paper counterparts.
This is absurd.
And yet Goyf remains untouched, the $100 irreplaceable creature card in every deck that plays forests in Modern/Legacy.
-offtopic rant over