2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [ROE] Rise of the Eldrazi insert image
    As far as zendikar angels all having halo's, Iona doesn't.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Pre-Release Stories
    I pulled all crap from WW, and nothing really playable. I managed a white red ally burn deck, but it didnt win at all.
    I pulled two fetch lands, and traded one for a jace mindsculptor, the other for a bazaar trader and a creeping tar pit. I also pulled a kor that puts weapons on the field, and traded her for a celestial colonade, which I then traded for a another creeping tar pit. The last trade I made of the night was a Hypnotic Specter for a Wrexial, the risen deep. That trade was way one sided but the guy was making up for a poor trade his binder buddy did on me.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on deck idea with Bazaar Trader
    So, how does bazaar trader work to permenantly keep there creatures with Act of Treason and Mark of Mutiny ?
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [WWK] Wrexial, the Risen Deep
    Quote from Ratoly
    Except they both have different uses. My prediction is simple: A lot of the newly printed cards are bad at first sight, but turn out to have plenty of combo potential. While my personal favorite is Quest for Ula's Temple, I can easily see its green and red counterparts being played. And while Wrexial is not quite as great as Jwar-Jwar, at U (<- link) he's a lot better.


    In order to keep him you are going to want to run a lot of counter spells. In order to play him with that spell consistently you are going to want to run a lot of creatures. Seems a bit counter intuitive.

    I really like this card though.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on WWK Rares Evaluated
    Quote from Joyd


    Terastodon is easily chump blocked? You've got a 9/9 and three 3/3s. How are they chumping that? If there's a reason that it's dubious in limited, it's because many games are decided by the time you can drop nine mana. Not because four creatures is somehow easier to block than one.


    You only get the 3/3's if you destroy your own permanents.
    I suppose at 9 mana it doesent matter to destroy 3 lands.
    No matter what your opinion is on cards, someone will always disagree. Not that I personally agree. I really like the one that brings out fatties.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [WWK]MaRo Twitter
    Sounds like Xathrid Demon. Maybe it will be better.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [WWK] Quicksand
    I dont know, on the opponents side, they basically see
    "Sac a with a toughness of 2 or less, destroy land''
    Even though its a colorless producing land, that seems worth the 1 or 2 mana the creature probably cost.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.