2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on How viable is WW in modern?
    ww is better in legacy.
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on [[Official]] "What Deck Should I Play?"
    Quote from DSlav
    looking to build a new deck, I have played Affinity, Burn and Elfball in the past for modern. I played Burn, Maverick, High Tide, Goblins and Jund in legacy.

    Favorite Play Style: Aggro, Combo, Midrange, Control, Tempo
    Looking to be Competitive in Local events and PTQs and such
    Favorite Colors: Black, Red
    Budget: No budget
    Staples Owned: Goyf, Bob, Thoughtseize, some fetches


    junk gets my vote
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on [Primer] Affinity
    Wolf_Cub82, your sb looks lite.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on Burn
    Quote from Lormador
    Lavamancer is great, it's not really to be compared with Keldon Marauders though. They serve very different purposes.

    Lavamancer:
    • Insurance against flooding out
    • Kills a lot of dangerous stuff with little cost, like Mother of Runes / Stoneforge Mystic
    • Great against Rishadan Port
    • Useful against Jitte
    • Good against Elves

    Keldon Marauders:
    • Good when Tarmogoyf wants to race
    • High damage/card output, can help race combo
    • Gets through Thalia's tax
    • Attacks through Thalia
    • Can come in off of Show and Tell for an extra point or two
    • Food for Lavamancer when it vanishes

    I really just don't like Sulfuric Vortex in the MD. When is this card really needed? In the lifegain matchups. Which decks have the most MD answers to this card? The lifegain matchups!


    I like it cause its continuous shock to the head, at 3 it is a stretch when I want to just kill them, which is why I am thinking of going with skullcrack, gives me the main effect I want(cant gain life stuff), cause if I lose to a deck that mb life gain I am going to lose and I dont want to rely on g2-3 to get the win.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on Burn
    I run patrick sullavins list(8 creatures), and I want to drop the 3 mb vortex for more 1-2cmc burn spells, skullcrack is intresting to say the least.

    But I have no room in my sb for them, I run his exact list -8 fetches and 2 brings.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on [[Official]] What [deck] should I play/buy/get into thread
    Ok i get ya, thanks mang.
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on [[Official]] What [deck] should I play/buy/get into thread
    Quote from Lormador
    Here's a link to the deck I was referring to. Josh Hendricks piloting the Caleb Durward Deadguy top 8 in November 2012.

    There's an article by the deck's author around the Internet somewhere.

    To really play this one you'll need Liliana of the Veil, but it doesn't run Wasteland.


    Thanks, is Mirran Crusader good in legacy?
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on [[Official]] What [deck] should I play/buy/get into thread
    Quote from Lormador
    MD you'll be packing Umezawa's Jitte and Batterskull, but that's just par for the course.

    I heard about someone experimenting with Ranger of Eos and Death's Shadow, but that might be too cute.

    You might want to avoid Thoughtseize, 'cause the line of fetch -> shockland -> Thoughtseize is a 5 life investment that really might not help your chances if the next card you want to play is Dark Confidant (perhaps the opener was fetch, Plains, cards... a keeper). A mixture of Inquisition of Kozilek and Cabal Therapy could serve you well, making the Lingering Souls variant look like the one to go with. One other card you might consider is Isolated Chapel. Successful Deadguy lists have run it in the past: even SCG top 8 lists, though you'll have to look all the way back to November of last year to find that one. I've run it and it's quite functional, pretty much a Scrubland most of the time.

    In the sideboard, you might want to go with the Enlightened Tutor plan and put in a single Circle of Protection: Red. There are some other options, like Warmth or Aegis of Honor, but I don't like them as much. The CoP can also help deal with Goblins and Progenitus, and Sulfuric Vortex can easily turn off Warmth.

    A nod to Wasteland might also be in order. When your opponent sees that you're playing with shocks, it might cause them to Wasteland more aggressively, reasoning that such action not only weakens your colored mana source but might even force you to take additional damage from fetching shocklands. Consequently, I would value fetching basics even more highly than usual. With duals, I'm often happy to fetch them out if I'm a bit heavy on land, hoping my opponent will be tempted to go down a land drop and sacrifice development in the hopes of cutting my colors. That's a lot less appealing for me if I've got to pay 2 life to use a land I fetch immediately.

    BW Stoneblade plays Deathrite Shaman anyway, but this will be even more important for you. You may wish to forgo playing Wasteland yourself, in order to better protect yourself from it. Fewer colorless lands in the deck will mean fewer mulligans.


    And this is why I love the legacy forum, the more I hang around the modern forum the more I hate the format cause most of that forum pisses me off. Its a headach, thanks for your imput, I plan on getting the duals at some point, was just curious and your right, the wasreland delema.

    Modern has no good ld.
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on [Primer] MonoU Tron - "The well-oiled machine"
    Quote from patlienemann
    I'm not sure what you mean by no one can get cockatrice. I use it almost daily. It's through woogerworks now not cockatrice.de
    google it.
    Free magic is free Grin


    That's good to know, to bad my pc is a paperweight now.

    I need a version to play on my tablet.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on [[Official]] What [deck] should I play/buy/get into thread
    Quote from Lormador
    Depends on the variant. All Maverick variants struggle against all-in combo. Dark Maverick does decently well against a lot of combo decks. T1 discard, T2 hatebear is a solid line of play.


    re: BW Stoneblade on shocklands, that is going to be a little rough. This deck runs 4 Dark Confidant and trades life for cards. One of the worst MUs is Burn, and shocklands will make that worse.

    If you go this route, you might want to make some sideboard decisions with that in mind. It will work though.

    re: Storm, the variant that seems to be doing the best is TES, partially because that's the variant Bryant Cook plays. I've seen ANT players do very well also. It's the pilot, not the variant, that I think is decisive here.


    Good stuff, I was thinking of using some form of life gain to back up the shock/bob self mutilation, but what life gain is actually good in legacy for this archtype?
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on [[Official]] What [deck] should I play/buy/get into thread
    Ok so I keep getting the shaft from the modern forum so I shall ask here.

    What I have currently built, PS legacy Burn, and RaggedJoe affinity, for modern I have mono u tron and Uw flash.

    I have most of bw stone blade aside from a few land pieces and core cards, I want a new modern deck but I play the cheap decks in modern.

    Could BW stoneblade be viable in paper using shock lands instead of actual duals? I don't have thoughtsieze or cabal but I have iok and duress which are viable options in legacy.

    I want a new legacy deck and I love bw stoneblade but should I just use my mana base for Wb tokens in modern?

    So far that is my options cause of what fetch lands I have left, I still need to get 6 more fetches and the BRings for my burn deck. But so far I am happy with how they work even though more fetches would help.

    Also a side note whats the best "storm" deck?
    Posted in: Legacy (Type 1.5)
  • posted a message on Doom Blade vs. Go For the Throat
    Quote from Cole McCool
    I'm curious as to which people prefer and which cards make one more prevalent than the other. While there are better choices with additional color application, I'm only looking at which of these two specifically is triumphant at this point in time.

    So far as I can tell, card weakness is as follows:

    Doom Blade:
    -Jund
    -Junk

    Go For the Throat:
    -Affinity

    Obviously there are more applications than just these. Any information to help narrow down the choice is appreciated in advance!


    Back in som/isd t2 you main deck one and sb the other.
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on [Primer] MonoU Tron - "The well-oiled machine"
    Quote from patlienemann
    Not sure if troll or new to magic online...
    Have you not heard of work station or cockatrice?


    work station sucks and noone can get cockatrice(that ive found) and I dont care for mtgo, I just want ct back so I can do testing.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on [Primer] MonoU Tron - "The well-oiled machine"
    Quote from Slivortal
    I don't know if this is true. G(r) Tron may be more popular among players who have access to both, but the MTGO scene is dominated by budget decks because players don't want to invest. If I had to guess, U Tron is more popular on MTGO than G(r) Tron, but I'd have to see statistics to be sure either way.

    Also, mono-green Tron is a variant of RG Tron. For all intents and purposes, they are the same deck. The R in G(r) Tron is only for playing Pyroclasm/Firespout (and Slaughter Games/Combust), and often they're not even MD. There's a reason I generally refer to the deck as G(r) Tron.

    EDIT: Also, the difficulty in playing U Tron is generally overexaggerated. There's more interaction with your opponent than G(r) Tron, but neither deck is overwhelmingly difficult to pilot (there are very few decks in Modern that are).

    EDIT2: Also, judging by MTGS's threads (not necessarily the best indicator, but an available one), U Tron is FAR more popular, with twice as many posts (from multiple posters) in less than half the time.


    IMO it is the control deck that moderns been looking for but bw has always been a strong control deck but I am working on a list that should be budget and put up strong results.

    I wish I could get some way to play magic for free on the pc.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Print this Wizards (so I can play it in modern)
    Quote from Badd Business
    The issue here is that all the cards you mentioned here are terrible maindeck choices. Unless you want to lose to the 90percent of the meta that isnt tron, you would be stupid to maindeck stone rain effects.

    Tectonic edge is far from useless against tron. If you have a tec edge, you can set them back after their 4th land drop hits. This provides an opportunity to resolve karn, but t3 karn is counterable via remand, mana leak, or even spell pierce. This is assuming you even see t3 karn anyway, which may not even happen.

    As for blood moon, no doubt its great, but it requires you to play red, and also requires you to warp your deck choices around it's inclusion solely to be good against tron.


    Hey I was just showing the options never said you had to use them, but they are there so quit crying that a 200$ decck beat your 600$+ deck.

    If your deck is cheap as well then you need to play a better deck that can beat it like aggro or a faster combo as tron imo took the control deck lead.

    Or play more discard and take out there win conditions, like a poster said, pithing needle, or any other hate type cards that most here think should be main deck options.

    Or maybe play better so you can get a bye and not have to play against tron.

    And why is tron now becoming the deck to hate against? and dont say its cause bbe and SS got banned.
    Posted in: Modern
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.