Quote from fahrenheights »I hope we get some infinite combo support because that seems to be the way the format is trending, and new players simply can't compete against all these established combo decks.
I hope not. I feel like infinite combos are a blight upon the format, because they promote playing specific decks that either win by turn 3-4 or try to stop other people from winning on turn 3-4.
1
Eh, it differs from plane to plane, and from god to god. In Theros the gods are empowered by their worshipers (thus being enchantment creatures and use devotion), but in Amonkhet they are expressions of the leylines of the plane (as shown by Nissa's vision, and no devotion). Illhag appears to be some sort of elemental creature and an expression of Ravnica itself.
It's even more obvious in non-mtg fantasy games. In some realms the gods require worship to retain power, while in others, such as the Forgotten Realms, the gods will have power regardless of whether they are worshiped or not.
3
Their reasoning for not streaming it is a load of bullcrap. If everyone else are allowed to stream from SDCC, then there is no logical reason WotC can't other than they don't want to. And if they don't want to, they should tell us to our faces instead of saying "sorry, were not allowed to stream from SDCC", particularly when it is very obviously a lie.
1
So would I, I've always been fond of the Naya combination, and I rather like Temur as well. And both Dimir and Abzan can make for some hella fun decks. With that said, it entirely depends on the decks themes and how they are built.
1
More likely in supplemental =/= as not going to appear in a standard legal set.
He said the same about Madness, and then Shadows over Innistrad happened. Anything that isn't an 11 on the Storm Scale can technically appear. And that means pretty much everything but Bands with other and substance can technically appear in a future standard legal set, it's just more or less likely.
1
If you think the concept of a Bag of Holding is exclusive to D&D, then you'd be wrong. The concept originally comes from older fantasy literature.
1
Brand new = Not existing before.
World based on D&D = Using a previously established world.
D&D in MTG is not going to happen outside of silverborder.
1
Or, you know, it was just reprints that were needed in Standard in general.
Somehow this always happens, and people end up disappointed when their prediction doesn't happen. I hope we get to Theros soon, but I haven't seen anything even hinting at it. On the contrary, with the number of powerful artifacts we've gotten in WAR and M20, I think it equally likely that we'll visit Kaladesh or Mirrodin. Or the number of vampire and wolf/werewolf tribal cards could be hinting at Innistrad. Or... you see where I am going with this? Sometimes we see patterns where there are none because we want something really bad.
Personally I'd love a return to a number of planes, but until we have more info about what comes after the fall set, it's baseless. We know the next set is a new world, we should concentrate on that one for now.
1
2
All in all, a bunch of solid commons. I like them.
1
The mortals are waging war against the gods, Heliod in particular, after the god of the sun killed their champion.