This site works best with JavaScript enabled. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this site.
Quote from thatmarkguy »Quote from KavuMonarch »So this is now confirmed fake after the big dominaria spoiler. There is only one card with Serra in its name and it’s an aura; there are only two cards with Sentinel in their names and neither are white. The list in the FAQ isn't the full card set, you know. I know. But its 132 cards include every card that might have had rules questions. This is absolutely a card that would have had rules clarifications necessary. ‘Dies during combat’ is an unusual clause. A FAQ would absolutely address that to make it clear that dying by any means during the combat phase triggers this - it does not need to be attacking or blocking and the death does not have to be from combat damage for it to trigger. Cathedral Membrane and Mongrel Pack were issued clarification rulings for this exact clause. This would have too. This isn’t Savannah Lions here. This is a card that would be among the FAQ’ed if it existed.
Quote from KavuMonarch »So this is now confirmed fake after the big dominaria spoiler. There is only one card with Serra in its name and it’s an aura; there are only two cards with Sentinel in their names and neither are white. The list in the FAQ isn't the full card set, you know.
So this is now confirmed fake after the big dominaria spoiler. There is only one card with Serra in its name and it’s an aura; there are only two cards with Sentinel in their names and neither are white.
It's confirmed fake for a different reason. The release notes say that all new cards are to be printed with a bar dividing the rules text from the flavor text, this card has nothing that I could describe as a bar, it uses the current layout.
(reminder most dinosaurs have scales only some breeds have feathers.)
recently the t-Rex was discovered to not have feathers (paleontologist in china found a t-Rex with skin pattern and it was scaley like we all know the dinosaurs.)
Quote from OneRingToGruulThemAll »All of this leaked *after* we find out the theme of the set?
Quote from dLANCER »Fact: Not Un Set #3.
Quote from DudeFromDenmark »Looking at this, it doesn´t look like there will be a Werewolf commander, not even multicolored werewolf like we had last time. Might be that they will be in the second set of the block
Quote from CalvinSchwa »Alright, million dollar question: how will they format the errata'd Mage-Ring Network?
Quote from Destructor » The "Snow mana 2.0" argument relies on the basis that "no change this big could be introduced in the middle of a block", falls over some counter examples: "Summon" Became "Creature -" in Classic Sixth Edition, which came between Urza's Legacy and Urza's Destiny. Expansion symbols that reflected the rarity of the cards were introduced in Exodus, which was the last expansion of the Rath Cycle (Tempest, Stronghold and Exodus)