MTG Salvation

Quote from Doom Lich

Obviously you don't understand what a fractal is. Fractals are exponential growth, slowly getting smaller and smaller to infinity. The point of the keyword "Fractalize" is to emphasize this.

Fractazoa 3 2UU
Creature - Jellyfish
Fractalize (During your upkeep put a -1/-1 counter on this creature. If you do, put a copy of it onto the battlefield with the same number of -1/-1 counters on it. If this would reduce this creature's toughness to 0, put a -1/-0 counter on it instead.)
2/2

the point of the keyword "flying" is to capture that a creature gets to fly above others but that doesn't mean it should read

Flying (This creature may only be blocked by creatures with flying. However, this creature may be still blocked by creatures without flying because this creature has to descend in order to attack the opposing player, thereby letting other creatures that don't fly block it. This captures the true essence of flying and the importance of Magic is to capture these terms 100% instead of making cards that actually make sense within the play of the game.)

lord clearly understood that fractals create copies and get smaller so thats why he made his card do. and everyone got it. we get it.

how is this remotely fair compared to Chronozoa?

affinity and offering are super awkward together. and at the end of the day, its just an 8/8 that costs 8 or less. not that exciting.

what happens if i ignite a grizzly bear?

Quote from Hoboverlord

you didn't seem to understand the card. you said pay 5 for a 1/1
you're not paying 5 for a 1/1
take a peek at its mana cost again.
0/W 0/U 0/B 0/R 0/G

My post: Last edited by gtmwarrior : Yesterday at 08:48 PM.
Your original post: Last edited by Hoboverlord : Yesterday at 08:57 PM.

did you think i wouldn't notice an edit when you completely changed the mana cost of the card? its a little noticeable when it goes from a COLORLESS card to a GOLD card.

sorry to keep bumping this thread because the cards are poorly designed and clearly this thread isn't going anywhere. but wow that was a sleazy sneak edit. pretending that i DIDNT UNDERSTAND the card when you went in and changed it after i posted.

pathetic.

yes i know. were you responding to me or someone else? i don't how explaining your card relates to what i said.

Quote from FoggManatic

yep. I take it sooo seriously that the 2 posts i've made in this thread contain made up pokemon using level up, and one post telling everyone to shut up and make pokemon into magic cards using level up like this thread intended in the first place instead of arbitrarily debating something that will never exist anyway. i don't care if your made up card says charizard on it, and by god, I hope no one else does, either.

your last post (and this one) sound pretty agitated for someone who cares so little. i'd compare your posts to other people who didn't care about this thread but they never posted in here. hmm.

Quote from Hoboverlord

i don't like how you suggest it gains trample.
my way, it only gets it if all 5 colors are spent
you're way, they can pay 1, then buff it up.
i don't want it to be single-color friendly

how many ways can you think of to add 4 +1/+1 counters to a creature? how bad is your strategy if you're playing FIVE for a 1/1 with the intention of using the +1/+1 counters card to buff it? why would you create a 2 card combo that takes 2 turns to creature a 5/5 just cause it has trample?

Quote from Doom Lich

No, someone had a point.

you're right, we need to take the custom card creation forum 10x more seriously. threads started on the internet about people making their own cards SHOULD be able to ruin the fun of magic for everyone else.

if custom card threads upset you this much, why are you reading them?

Quote from FoggManatic

this discussion seems like a good way to ruin something that was fun. They're magic cards, they evolve and you assume they are something else. If you want a needlessly complicated, crappy, narrow way to fully and truly simulate the evolution of pokemon on a card, then magic is not the damn game for you. Pokemon is, so go play it.

someone had a bad day.

Furance seems awkward. it feels like you'd be playing black just to get extra toughness boosts, which is white, but obv the shade ability is black. everything about the card is right but put together it feels weird.

Something Dark is well designed.

i'd feel uneasy about printing the LD cards, given how easy it becomes to end turn 3 and the opponent has 0 lands.

from a search on gatherer, i couldn't find any other card that let you go infinite. if its literally only that one card, there's no reason to add that restriction. not just because its safer to print, but because adding that restriction implies there's cards that make it relevant and if its only thought reflection, the card is both misleading and confusing.

the second you can draw 2 cards off the activation (like thought reflection, although i'm not sure of any other ways to do this) you can repeat indefinitely and replace your hand with anything in your library. may or may not be broken.. though a combo deck with the two would certainly be attempted.

to avoid the extra wording make it "put the top card of your library into your hand"