Quote from Ryperior74 »
Guys don’t get comfy this dude could get a ban hammer as quick as lutri, the Spellchaser did since Iona, Shield of Emeria got banned for similar reasons
Quote from CrimsonWings_3689 »It really does seem like the wording for this card is incomplete. By comparison, the Mythos of Snapdax card specifies that you get to choose what each player gets to keep if the RB is part of the total cost paid for it. This card should have been worded differently. Something like "Destroy target nonland creature. If GW was spent to cast this spell, destroy target nonland permanent instead."
Shouldn't have to infer what the card is trying to convey. As is, the whole "reading the card, explains the card." isn't clear with the current wording...
Quote from Dontrike »Is it just me or is the wording a little a confusing when compared to past cards with a similar "if paid with X" effects.
With is divine visitation while
I can create lots of angles it *****s down the thropter production and creating artifacts however you can sac an angle to the witching well to cresten2
Food tokens and repeat the process
Quote from Cranky »It's sad that the RC is so short-sighted and seems to have selective vision (Sol Ring as you stated is also an auto-include, along with many other cards).
My one concern is how to prove you've met the restrictions (which to my knowledge WotC hasn't addressed?).
Quote from Wizmin »The mechanic should probably just be outright banned rather than the cards.
Quote from schweinefett »broken fall