Quote fromHe said, several times, he tested, and said what his conclusions are.
thats an interesting notion, considering;
Quote fromAs for whether or not I've tested this matchup? Specifically vs. whatever you're playing? Obviously not.
my suggestion, read the thread before you make some outrageous claim. I have yet to see where Cyan comes out and posts any relevant testing data, all he keeps saying is that we should just take his word for it, because he has played many games.
Quote fromIf I am not mistaken, Lesurgo just posted a reply.
Im talking about specific action, ie. warning, suspension, something on those terms. Ya know, the same sort of things that are handed out to other users of this forum for doing less than what Cyan is right now...
Quote fromIf you get warnings (plural) maybe, just maybe you should doubt your innocence.
mmm... Just the like the two lesurgo handed me the other day, that were later deleted by Goblin Boy... I suppose I should have doubted my innocence then too, but I didnt, and well I know you cant check my user notes, but I assure you, those warnings cease to exist now.
This is like Bush saying "I am the president of the united states, so I must be good and right.".Quote from
Which is wrong.
your powers of drawing comparisons seem to evade me. as I have pointed out; I have, BB18 has, and Nan has convincing DATA (data being the keyword) that states WF is the spell you should be naming. If anything, Cyan is guilty of this accusation more than anyone. If you read the majority of his reponses they basically say the same things; the person playing the deck isnt as good as me, and they are running a sub optimal list in his opinion.
Quote fromBy posting many, many replies here, it certainly seems you want us to believe your deck ideas are the best. To make yourself believable, you have to bring something else than "look at the tag under my name", and "I am good, and I have playtested". By saying this, you made yourself even less believable.
I do have a tag under my name, that states I know what I am doing. at least, more so than you sir. I am good and I have playtested. what is the issue with me pointing that out. Its funny had you actually, you know playtested, you would get upset too if someone who has not is telling you that they have an opinion that refutes you hard work to determine fact. though, thats just if you have actually playtested. I like to at least intelligently discuss my hard work, I would have no issue taking this junk had I not actually tested.