Magic Market Index for Sep 14th, 2018
 
Magic Market Index for Sep 6th, 2018
 
Magic Market Index: Hit Over Miss
  • posted a message on Chemister's Insight
    Glimmer is way more powerful, the scry makes it so that you almost always draw quality cards. This isn't bad but I think that you need to have some ways to exploit its jumpstart ability (other than casting it, e.g. Search for Azcanta/surveil) to make the best use of the card.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Dream Eater
    This is very good for Standard. I don't think it's fair to compare it with Torrential Gearhulk. Super-powered Kaladesh block is rotating out so cards like this look like they have a chance to shine in the new environment.

    Besides, once you get to 6 mana, it's easy to chain them since Surveil 4 digs A LOT and the bounce keeps you alive.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Arena Unique Cards
    Off the top of my head, there's also a 2/1 Flash for 1B, an instant for 1B that destroys a creature with power 2 or less, some low power goblins, a 3BB 5/5 can't block that etb deals 5 damage to opponent and some others I don't remember.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Thorn Lieutenant
    Sylvan Advocate has done it before. Card seems pushed and there will be more elves in Ravnica. Hmmm...
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [Deck] UBx Mill
    How is Ensnaring Bridge working for people? You rarely empty your hand that fast to completely ignore attacks and the deck can have some trap (pun intended) draws that deactivate the bridge such as Visions and... Archive Trap. Humans seems to be the worst matchup where Bridge looks insane on paper but in practice they have a ton of ways to disrupt you and they don't search the library.

    Maybe Crypt Incursion and Darkness in a more aggressive milling strategy are the way to go?
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on Rat Colony
    Bontu's Monument should allow you to cast all these rats cheaply, while draining the opponent.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Colorless Eldrazi Tron
    I'm going to try 1x Lightning Greaves in the version with 4x Endbringer. Looks promising vs Jace/BBE decks. Not sure if it belongs to the main deck because hyper aggro decks are still a thing, but the card looks fine to me as a 1-of.
    Posted in: Big Mana
  • posted a message on UW Draw-GO Control
    How often do you side out Censors? I always seem to get rid of them in most matchups where I have to put in more than 3 cards from the sideboard. For example versus Mardu, I need both some Negates and some creatures (2 Torrential Gearhulk and Linvala, the Preserver) and there is no clear cut from the deck. After removing 1-2 Hieroglyphic Illumination and an Approach of the Second Sun, I start shaving Censors. I don't know if it's correct.

    Also vs Energy they seem to be decent vs turn three Rogue Refiner or Whirler Virtuoso but I really need the other spells in my deck more (there aren't any bad cards in the main deck vs energy but you can't hope to resolve your Fumigates and Approaches with their Negates flying around so you need your own counters to have a chance).
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on UW Draw-GO Control
    I am preparing for nats and I've been testing both online and on paper. Here are some thoughts:
    - 26 lands + 4 Approach seems like the best combination. I frequently played my cycling lands because it's so important not to lose land drops. I've lost so many favorable matchups due to missing crucial land drops.

    - Immolating Glare is very good. Blessed Alliance has been clunky for me at times, so I started testing the 3 Alliance/ 2 Glare split and have never changed it even though I have made several other changes since the deck first appeared.

    - jacobk's list is very good. I think at least one Gideon of the Trials is correct. Not sure about the Ramunap matchup though. Without Linvala, the Preserver and/or Regal Caracal, you are forced to mulligan into Authority of the Consuls or you just lose. Even then, mulliganing to 5 while trying to reach 7 mana as soon as possible might not be enough to stay alive, even with the Authority down.

    - I tested mana rocks as well to accelerate the deck. They were decent enough, but I changed my mind immediately after an Abrade smashed my turn 4 Hedron Archive. Lesson learned: Don't give your opponent targets for their dead cards in the first game Smile

    Has anyone tested Spell Queller? I used to play them but was discouraged by the Fumigate nonbo and in matchups where you side out Fumigate, Negates are also effective (having both Negate and Queller in the sb is too many slots).
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on [Deck] Reanimator
    Quote from TheFloss »
    I'm going to play GPTs/Side Events with the following list at GP Amsterdam on the weekend (second decklist)

    https://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/this-week-in-legacy-mkm-frankfurt-and-the-first-week-without-top

    I presume he ran the Godless because he didn't have access to a Scrubland. I know there are conflicting opinions on UB vs BR but I don't have the Seas. I've been testing online and the deck seems like great fun and relatively consistent, but I could just be running hot. I like the fact that it has 8 disruption pieces maindeck.

    Question for you experts: Do I wait until G3 to board in Wear//Tear, or do I assume everyone has them in their board and bring them in for Game 2?


    Not an expert by any stretch, but in my opinion you should know at least which matchups have Chalice/Leyline (Stompy, Eldrazi, etc.) and are expected to board that in against you. Expecting Grafdigger's Cage is a bit more difficult to predict. Usually most people just bring in Surgicals. Scouring the 5-0 decklists on MTGO leagues will probably give you an idea what sideboard cards people usually bring in.

    I personally like the UB version where looting is replaced by careful study and you have access to Show and Tell after sb. What happens if the Scrubland gets Wasted?
    Posted in: Combo
  • posted a message on Iconic Masters November 2017
    Quote from thatmarkguy »
    Quote from foukas »
    The most probable explanation for not naming it Eternal Masters is that Eternal Masters only contained non modern-legal cards and this could have legal cards from any expansion without restrictions.


    But eternal masters *had* modern legal cards. Wrath of God, Isochron Scepter, Call the Skybreaker, Eight-and-a-Half Tails...


    My mistake, that was the case with the MTGO-only set Vintage Masters.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Iconic Masters November 2017
    The most probable explanation for not naming it Eternal Masters is that Eternal Masters only contained non modern-legal cards and this could have legal cards from any expansion without restrictions.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Vizier of Tumbling Sands, Deem Worthy, Shefet Monitor, Stir the Sands
    Quote from midorimage »
    Would Chameleon Colossus be considered a desert? If so, cycling and putting a pro-black creature onto the battlefield at instant speed is bonkers.


    Nope, Desert is a land type, not a creature type.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [Deck] Reanimator
    Quote from magicmurph »

    Game 3: hit the dream hand, Land, 2 x ritual, Grisel, Collective brutality, exhume, Chancellor
    Reveal Chancellor
    Play Land
    Cast Ritual (go to 3B)
    Cast Collective brutality pitching Grisel & Chancellor(go to 1B) he reveals no forces which suprises me but has GY hate so that's why he keeps i guess
    Cast Ritual
    Cast Exhume for Grisel
    activate Grisel, find a reanimate and bring in the chancellor.
    OPP folds.

    How did you escalate twice with no creature in play?

    Nice report. I'm also thinking of bringing that to GP Vegas but let's see what Amonkhet has in store first (probably nothing, but it's a graveyard set so who knows..).
    Posted in: Combo
  • posted a message on 3/13/2017 B+R Announcement: No Changes
    Considering that they thought that GP Utrecht results were relevant and not the two GPs of the previous day (where it was just two archetypes facing each other), it is pretty clear that the explanation text was written before these GPs. If they had 1-2 more weeks of data it is possible that they would ban some stuff.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.