2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Is Magic Attendance and Sales dropping?
    Quote from idSurge »


    RTR and Khan's had 'multi coloured matters'.

    RTR and Khan's had the mana fixing required to support multi coloured.

    A deep environment supports multi colour, to a point, with available punishment if people get greedy.



    I'm curious, what exactly were the punishments available in Return to Ravnica and Khans of Tarkir?

    I wasn't playing Standard then, but I collected quite a lot of cards from that era (Khans of Tarkir reminds me so much of The Last Airbender and Legend of Korra, and that makes me smile). There aren't any Blood Moon style cards in those sets, and all the Standard deck archives from both those eras show a lot of three and four color decks.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Upcoming sets will be Vikings and/or Western
    You know, there was a time when I'd have been beside myself with anticipation for a viking-themed Magic set. I'm sure it'll look fine and maybe even have an interesting twist (as Sheoldred alluded to) - Amonkhet hit both of those targets, at least for my money. But Amonkhet was also just not that interesting. As much as I love flavor, you do sometimes have to think a little about interesting to play and, yes, fun to play, when it's a game, and I don't have much faith in them to do that right now. :|
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Chandra, Gremlin Wrangler
    The art on that Chandra card really looks like it was based on a photo of Becky Lynch.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Dealing with Carnage Tyrant
    Did I not predict that the control mages would segue seamlessly into complaining about threats right away? And about this exact card, no less? Rolleyes

    And it's jumping the gun, of course. The set isn't even in Standard yet and control traditionally gets stronger towards the end of a block. (I don't know whether that pattern will hold once they no longer release sets in blocks, but I think the pattern of strengthening after it's been established what sorts of threat decks are possible in the current card pool will probably hold.)

    Until then, it's worth testing: Lay Bare the Heart.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Counterbalance and Divining Top
    I used to get good mileage out of Burning-Tree Shaman against Sensei's Divining Top, but that was back when Extended was slower than Modern or Legacy are now.

    They could always print more stuff that can't be countered or can return from the graveyard to play (as in after it's been countered), but that would be unfair to blue apparently. Rolleyes
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on State of Standard Thread: bans, format health, metagame, rotation, etc!
    That probably makes sense, but I kind of suspect there won't be a good reaction no matter what's in Ixalan. A lot of people have already gotten themselves so worked up into shallow, knee-jerk reactions like "Open Fire should have been Lightning Bolt!!" that if Ixalan doesn't turn Standard into Modern, it won't be good enough.

    And there are also plenty of "Timmy" cards people will latch on to as supposedly unbeatable and turn into memes (Carnage Tyrant is definitely the favorite for that).
    Posted in: Standard (Type 2)
  • posted a message on Fundamentally changing card release in Magic (and a couple other things)
    I like the idea of the boosters for different purposes. There are often negative impacts on constructed if you have to get cards for it from boosters packed for limited, and there are often negative impacts on limited when you put cards in the set that are intended for constructed (cf. Lightning Bolt was printed as an uncommon in Modern Masters 2017).

    The one comment that I would make, though, is that you might want to keep flavor-themed boosters, whether for constructed or limited or whatever other purpose they are printed for. One of the strengths of Magic is the variety of visual styles and card concepts between (or within) different planes. If your concept is "year of steampunk", both your limited and constructed boosters for that year would have art and names like Kaladesh, and it would be followed by the "year of Egypt".
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on $2 Deck Thread
    You know, not everyone has $2 on hand to spend on a Magic deck whenever they want . . .

    Wink

    On a more serious note, I would love to see more of your ideas - I was reminded of a lot of hidden gems by reading these!
    Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats
  • posted a message on How much should it cost to play Standard & Modern competitively?
    "Cheap" has completely different connotations for different people. I remember a discussion on a different forum once where someone asked for deck advice, and then got angry when someone replied suggesting an uncommon card that fit the strategy (I forget what it was exactly; something on the tier of Boros Guildmage or so). The original poster responded indignantly: "I can't justify spending $1.00 on a playset of an uncommon card."
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on What's the point in Bolas creating the Eternals?
    I suspect that literally the only reason is so the art director could ask the artists to make lots of generically "badass" art with lots of shiny black armor and fire and fighting and stuff.
    Posted in: Magic Storyline
  • posted a message on Did cost-efficient AND power cards hurt MTG's potential growth?
    Quote from Lithl »
    Quote from solidscheme »
    There still has to be a way for both Standard and Modern to build off each other.
    Why does there "have to" be a way?


    I'd guess he means "have to" as in "should". Personally, I think that regardless of your field, you should be trying to build a devoted fanbase, not a rotating one. I think Rosewater once said that the average player sticks with the game for six years, which is pretty long by modern standards, but when you consider that there are still people playing the first edition of Dungeons and Dragons . . .
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Life Sized Cardboard Cutouts
    Speaking of these cutouts, has anyone noticed that most of Magic's advertising seems to be aimed at people who already play Magic? Think of how the tokens you get occasionally in boosters have ads on the other side - you're not going to see that unless you've already bought a booster, or somebody else threw one in the garbage, in which case the odds are better than even you're already in a tournament or something. And those cardboard cutouts are invariably in hardcore LGSes where Magic is well established. Shouldn't they be putting these things in comic books, on billboards, in Target, or wherever they're going to be seen by people who don't yet know they should be interested in Magic?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Full list
    Are you really suggesting that casual players don't buy boxes? I'm really not sure that's correct. By definition, we have no idea what people are doing in their own houses/cafeterias/whatever.

    And besides, Wizards of the Coast let slip a statistic a couple of years ago to the effect that less than 15% of Magic players have ever been to a tournament. That's ever, in their entire life.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on What's Wrong With Today's Magic?
    Quote from rubiera »

    3. Vorthos is not the fourth type of player, just deal with it. We are here to play Magic, and fantasy fiction is a small side show.




    If this is the case, then I'm curious why people who don't have an interest in fantasy, or only have a minor interest in it, choose Magic at all. Is it just because it's the biggest TCG and it only happens to be fantasy themed? If what you want is to play cards and you don't care about flavor, why not play poker?

    Poker also has the advantage that they're never going to print a strictly better Ace of Spades . . .
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on What's Wrong With Today's Magic?
    I know this makes me by far the odd man out on this forum, but: I kind of like that they've stepped back from the extremely high-power point on certain things. I didn't like Zendikar Standard when everybody was blustering all over the place about how everything dies to Lightning Bolt and Mana Leak and Doom Blade so you shouldn't be caught dead playing anything that doesn't have a bunch of comes-into-play effects.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.