MTG Salvation

Don't use the transform tool to resize the image. A digital image can be printed at virtually any size. If you're using photoshop, go to "Resize Image", check the pixel width and height, then change the measurements to the size you want and re-enter the same pixel width and height. The image won't become pixelated, and it'll print out at high quality at the size you want.

Oh no, it's the living dead!


I wonder who could've raised them?


Oh, that explains it. Hey, isn't he from Ravnica? So then we'd probably run into...


Yikes, I wonder who it is they're guarding.


Ooh, exciting. Hey, what's that in his pocket?

LEGENDS!!!

Quote from TheEvilCliff

I wouldn't mind the futureshifted frame so much if the symbols in the corner weren't a direct ripoff of the CCG Rage.

I miss those werewolves!

I looked up the Rage CCG to see what you were talking about. The only thing close to that one is the Creature symbol on the future sight cards, and even then it's different. So I don't really know what you're talking about.

Here's my modern template (also posted in the PSD templates thread):

Modern Template

Also, if anyone's looking for hi-res official Magic art, I've updated my Magic Art Archive thread with everything currently available for AVR, and am uploading for DKA and ISD.

Because it can be relevant, if you end the turn *during* the end step (and, thus, with the "lose the game" trigger on the stack), it will not trigger again. It will be exiled when the turn is ended so you still won't lose, but it is important to note that letting it trigger and ending the turn prevents you from losing and prevents it from triggering again.

Quote from Teia Rabishu »

The thing is that it's a situation where both sides are decidedly not equal. On the one hand, we have a member of the community who may or may not have done some things people dislike (such as play Flip It Or Rip It) and members of the community who act in utterly toxic, virulent ways that actively serve to shrink the community by driving people away. Defending the latter is defending trolling and harassment, and MTGSalvation is not the space for such activities. Therefore, discussing recent events is fine, but attempting to defend abhorrent behaviour and those who commit same is not fine. I won't speak to the above-infracted post, but it's perfectly possible to have a civilized discussion about the events surrounding Christine Sprankle without delving into "SJW" nonsense.

Hey hey hey. You said the forbidden acronym. Give yourself an infraction. Now.

To clarify, Ashiok gave a well-written, thoughtful analysis of the situation and its many moving parts, and Wildfire basically saw the forbidden acronym (look, I don't want an infraction myself) and tossed out an infraction. This is an opportunity to have a real discussion about the issue, but it would seem the mods just want an echo chamber.

Look, I believe that Jeremy is a toxic presence in the Magic community. He's frankly a vile, yet oddly impotent *****stirrer. However, when we completely wall off an opportunity for real dialogue and discussion, we confer newfound credibility to the venom he so readily spews out. Sometimes, we have to hear the other side, even if it does make our skin crawl a little bit. Hearts and minds aren't changed by silence and censorship.

But of course, if none of the mods can get on board with this, I'll save any potential commenters the time:

"Jeremy sucks and women should be treated fairly." x 100. /thread

I know I'm not in a position to have a say on this, but I think it is just better to lock the thread and do not talk about the subject then. I accept my infraction, it is okay, but higher levels of policing in a delicate matter like this is not going to foster an environment for a positive dicussion, in my view. I feel like this current situation with the cosplayer is directly related to the topics I mentioned before. Look at the state of this thread: there are 4 mod posts so far and 3 community member posts.

If you think the subject can't be addressed in certain angles to the point that it can't be discussed, then it is better not to discuss it. That is how I see it. For instance, I disagree with something Marsquisd said, but I can't even address it without receiving another infraction.

So the trick is to not post in this thread, then? Looking at the other thread it seems like everyone not condemning the guy was given a warning for trolling. This is really poor conduct by the mods.