He's saying they are both scummy.
They both have bad arguments.
They both are leaning town.
If he said. They just seem like mad town ranting at each other that would be one thing. But he's trying to make is seem like he is on one side. Yet when you look at it, he really is just trying to stay out of the middle of it.
also Yanni is not under FOS any more. Burst i still under FOS and JS/PF are under HOS.
Where did he say both are scummy?
He said both had shaky arguments but that both were town. I haven't seen anything that even hints he thought both of them were scum.
Yeah that's pretty much all he's been doing.
"Oh I think they both have pretty shaky arguments." Then making an empty threat.
I skimmed earlier and missed it but this post is just horrible. PF made one post saying that Yanni and Burst had shaky arguments, but then proceeded to say they were both leaning town, and later asked everyone to give their opinions on one of the few things that's happened, yet that's apparently "all he's been doing."
Vote: Reya
On a relevent note: I was definitely being stupid about burst. I checked Yanni's sig but didn't realize super sentai was basic 37. I saw he listed basic 42 by number and assumed the others weren't basics. I need to reread what Burst has written now that I know what Yanni is talking about, but I'm not doing it tonight.
Trix said that he read my town games, then when I questioned him about them he said "idk, I'm only going on what you've said"
see the lie?
look closer
I thought that's where you were going with that. in that case, I completely disagree with that burst is lying in that case. He mentioned a few games he's read, and said he hasn't read some specific games you brought up.
Well, whoever you are, you are at least good at this game. I really don't like Burst right now, and even though LAL is not a great rule lying is still bad. Unvote Vote: Burst
Again, feeling stupid, but what lies are you voting Burst for?
Lost internet for the last few days, and was kind of worried when the thread doubled in size, but luckily it was just Burst and Yanni.
I don't like Bursts meta argument, mainly because I don't think meta is a good argument in general, but I'm not seeing either burst or Yanni as scum right now.
Beary has 2 votes already, two of which are RVS votes by my count, and I'm not okay with putting votes on him unti lhe has
1. Answered my question
2. Had serious votes on him, so we don't accidently lynch someone with only five players voting (2 of which might stay due to lurk)
I think you're seriously overthinking putting a third vote on beary. If a mislynch happens like you've described, the last two people on the wagon are scum or complete idiots.
I would also like everyone to post how much they are familiar with the theme. I have heard about and seen videos but never played minecraft for instance.
Because two of those votes on him are RVS votes, AND with those two votes NOT being unvoted it would allow a 5 Person Lynch, which I am NOT okay with.
The two RVS votes on Beary make it so less than 1/2 of the players are aloud to Lynch someone, which is NOT okay with me.
Right now I'm not liking Chibi for not explaining why he wants to kill Beary, and I'm waiting for Beary to answer my question before I decided on him/her
No one's talking about a speed lynch, we're talking about a third vote. You seem really worried by the idea that no one else will take the rvs votes into account.
Also, didn't you just say in you're last post you weren't going to vote beary? That sounds like you've already decided. Is there something I'm misunderstanding here?
You still have you're random vote on beary. You're posts since the end of the rvs have all indicated a dislike of beary's posting style, but haven't had ... well ... anything else. Should we assume your vote on beary is serious?
So the first time I say it's a joke you tell me it's retroactive reasoning and make 3 more posts saying I'm scum/that you want to lynch me, but the second time I say it's a joke you just say ok and drop it?
Just to be as clear as possible, I do not support a massclaim at this time.
I thought the was enough to make it obvious, but the day 1 massclaim was a joke based on the fact that every game I've read since coming back to these forums has had someone propose one.
Where did he say both are scummy?
He said both had shaky arguments but that both were town. I haven't seen anything that even hints he thought both of them were scum.
I skimmed earlier and missed it but this post is just horrible. PF made one post saying that Yanni and Burst had shaky arguments, but then proceeded to say they were both leaning town, and later asked everyone to give their opinions on one of the few things that's happened, yet that's apparently "all he's been doing."
Vote: Reya
On a relevent note: I was definitely being stupid about burst. I checked Yanni's sig but didn't realize super sentai was basic 37. I saw he listed basic 42 by number and assumed the others weren't basics. I need to reread what Burst has written now that I know what Yanni is talking about, but I'm not doing it tonight.
I thought that's where you were going with that. in that case, I completely disagree with that burst is lying in that case. He mentioned a few games he's read, and said he hasn't read some specific games you brought up.
As I said in my last post, I don't think either of them are scum. Both are leaning towards town and I don't feel either is the correct lynch today.
So, it's fence sitting to say he thinks both players are town? Guess I'm fence sitting too. You guys should have called me on it sooner.
@Arcadic: Not to backseat mod, but can we get an update on Nightarcher? It's been 8 days since we heard from him.
Sorry, but I'm being stupid right now. What is the lie exactly?
Again, feeling stupid, but what lies are you voting Burst for?
I don't like Bursts meta argument, mainly because I don't think meta is a good argument in general, but I'm not seeing either burst or Yanni as scum right now.
I meant that in a humorous manner, not a serious "be here or get replaced" way.
I think you're seriously overthinking putting a third vote on beary. If a mislynch happens like you've described, the last two people on the wagon are scum or complete idiots.
So beary answered and pointed out that he(she?) said a massclaim was a bad idea but the suggestion alone wasn't scummy.
I play minecraft all the time.
No one's talking about a speed lynch, we're talking about a third vote. You seem really worried by the idea that no one else will take the rvs votes into account.
Also, didn't you just say in you're last post you weren't going to vote beary? That sounds like you've already decided. Is there something I'm misunderstanding here?
You still have you're random vote on beary. You're posts since the end of the rvs have all indicated a dislike of beary's posting style, but haven't had ... well ... anything else. Should we assume your vote on beary is serious?
There should be some rule about going on V/LA for longer then the game has been running.
Maybe, but I'll decide that. I'd like to know why you changed your mind about it being "retroactive reasoning."
I actually don't like this.
So the first time I say it's a joke you tell me it's retroactive reasoning and make 3 more posts saying I'm scum/that you want to lynch me, but the second time I say it's a joke you just say ok and drop it?
FOS: Yanni
I thought the
unvote
Regular
Which was the joke. I think it went over Yanni's head though.
Jeez, making excuses for scummy play already, first 2 scum found
Also, since someone has to: I propose a day 1 massclaim.
I've missed you most of all Seppel, just for comments like this.
It's been a while since I've had enough free time to play and I've been missing it.