2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on New Format on Its Way Edit No it's not.
    It makes sense. They just announced they were doing away with Modern for Pro Tours, and I wouldn't be surprised to see them ramping down support for Modern in favour of something new.

    Not long to wait to see anyways.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on MTGSalvation Eternal Masters Prediction Contest - Winner: Zephyr_Scarlet!
    Um...Garruk Relentless is a DFC that's showing on the list of eligible. If I'm actually allowed to pick that, I'd like to say it's not being reprinted instead of disenchant.

    Will be reprinted:
    Berserk
    Natural Order
    Dark Ritual
    Rishadan Port
    Baleful Strix


    Won't be reprinted:
    Exploration
    Preordain
    Mutavault
    Marsh Casualties
    Disenchant
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Delving Time Walk
    If they want to play it safe, I'd predict a triple-blue + some amount of colourless, if they want to push it for competitive play a double-blue + colourless would probably still be pretty OK.

    Quite frankly though, I'd like to see a Berserk variant. Become immense is cool, but not quite a berserk.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Feldon of the Third Path
    Quote from Weebos »
    A strong effect, a cheap general, and flavor on flavor. This is a great card.

    Is this guy a character from Magic's history?


    Yep, he had a cane. Feldon's Cane
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Ankle Shanker
    In a standard where our only on-colour fetchland for this wedge is Bloodstained Mire I don't see it being likely.

    You could run painlands instead I guess, but I don't think this has a real shot at working out until the enemy fetches hit standard.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Sam Stoddard's preview card next week
    With Nykthos in standard XXBBBB doesn't seem that hard to do.

    It would be amazing if this card is a permanent of some kind.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Ravages of War reprint?
    HA! No way!

    It's not coming back to standard. It's not a good fit for commander.

    It might end up being a judge promo one day. Or possibly snuck into modern if they decide to add cards to that format without putting them in standard.

    But no way is it making a comeback in standard.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [[M15]] Aggressive Mining
    I tried this card in draft, it really didn't work. I never drew it when I wanted it, and the times that I had it were times when I didn't want to play it.

    If you're going to play this, you want it when you already have lots of lands in play, so ideally you're going to play it with lots of ramp/fetch cards.

    Now, lets say you've set it up perfectly, you and your opponent each have empty hands and around a dozen land on an otherwise empty board. You draw this.

    Turn 1, you play it and sac a land. You have now two cards in hand, and have hit parity (it cost you 1 land + itself, drawn 2).
    Their turn, you sac a land. You are now +1 card.
    Your turn, you sac a land. You are now +2 cards.

    In the deck that this works well in, you're playing lots of ramp cards, which you don't want at this stage of the game. How many of the six cards you drew are dead? Well, any and all lands are dead draws, plus once you've got this many lands on the board, any fetch spells turn into "eventually draw two".

    So, it takes time to get you ahead, and you really only come out ahead if you don't draw dead, and it also guarantees that sometimes you'll draw dead.

    This card encourages you to play lots of lands, so that you have lots of lands to sacrifice, but it also encourages you not to play lots of lands, because they're dead draws once it's in play.

    This card stinks.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [New Info] Modern event deck contents
    Often times, online resellers have gotten around the restriction by telling you that they will open the product before they ship it to you.

    And then they're shipping you a used product. If this is something with fixed contents that you're intended to open anyways, that may not matter to you.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on New DCI policy changes effective on Journey into Nix's release
    Lets be realistic here and stop discussing pacemakers and hearing aids. No judge in their right mind is going to disallow a player from using a pacemaker or hearing aid.

    This policy change is clearly intended to remove grey area surrounding outside assistance via devices that connect to the internet.

    Your smartphone is out-of-bounds. Your pacemaker is 100% legal.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[M15]] Polluted Delta/Wooded Foothills?
    In the original posting, the delta was created and the caption was "Don't believe everything you read during spoiler season"
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Pile Shuffling... Illegal?
    It's not illegal, but it's not a shuffle.

    You still need to shuffle thoroughly if you put your cards into piles.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [[BNG]] Kiora is up!
    This card is huge in bant control.

    She guarantees that your Surpreme Verdicts will be at least 2-for-1s. Combined with AoT you're basically never going to die to creatures.

    Putting Koira and Supreme Verdict in the same deck will put the opponent in an awkward position. Either they commit multiple creatures to a board and risk losing card advantage to Supreme Verdict, or they only commit one and risk you dropping Koira to neutralize it completely.

    She's fantastic.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [Speculation] Wizards Reprinting Fetchlands?
    I believe when Onslaught lands are finally reprinted, we'll probably see the demise of Legacy.


    I can provide independent confirmation that the sky is indeed falling.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Forgot to scry in a tournament
    Yes, exactly what Slivurn said. If your opponent plays a card that requires them to scry and they don't scry, you need to point it out to them or call a judge. Not doing so could set you up for a very uncomfortable conversation.

    That said, you don't have to point out an opponents missed trigger. If a card says "At [phase x] do [this action]" and they forget, that's a trigger, you don't need to point this out. If it says "When [some condition] happens, do [this action]" that's also a trigger.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.