2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Summary of events and PWP multipliers?
    The thing is whether an organizer requests the increased multiplier. SCG does for opens, our store has for TCGPlayer events in the past. They default to 1x unless they are WotC events or have had increase requests.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Neither Player Notices Rules Violation
    Quote from Befuddlement
    If you honestly committed a rules violation unintentionally, you should always contact a judge as soon as possible. If you purposefully ignore it, you are cheating and can get disqualified.

    Assuming you at a large competitive level event (PTQ, SCG open, GP etc) your opponent will probably get a warning as well for not "maintaining the game state"


    Actually, he would get a warning for a Game Rules Violation, and his opponent would get the Failure to Maintain Gamestate, but only if the game is in progress. Other than cheating, we don't apply penalties to infractions that occurred in completed games. Yes, you should still discuss this with a judge, not because anything can or would be done, but if you do it again, you want to have an open honest history with this judge, so there is no doubt to it being a mistake.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Is it legal?
    There are lots of people who will (and have) paid a decent amount for these. It is essentially a paid entry into a 50k.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on [M13] Mana Leak is out
    Apparently people don't remember the same thing was said about lightning bolt once. Then it came back. Just a normal part of the Magic life cycle.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [Niles, IL] Pastimes Modern
    Pastimes will now be hosting weekly Modern Constructed events on Sundays. Registration 12pm, start time 12:30pm. $5 entry fee with prizes based on attendance.

    For more information visit:
    http://pastimes.net
    Posted in: Recurring Events
  • posted a message on Wizards Ban Jace, the Mindsculptor and Stoneforge Mystic From Standard
    Hmm... I am now wary of the next visit to Mirrordin... as each time we go there something gets banned in standard. But on a serious note, as a Jace owner while I'm not estatic about the announcement it is good for the format. (I also got 3 for free from packs and bought the 4th when they were $25, so that might be why I'm not upset) I'm also glad that in their explanation they recognize that cards like oblivion ring and nice catch alls for "mistakes" that they might make, at least as far as permanents go. Guess I'll break out those Valakuts I hid in my closet.
    Posted in: News
  • posted a message on [Gaymers]: Check Out Our Impressive Members!
    Chicago regional pre-release anyone?
    Posted in: Retired Clan Threads
  • posted a message on Judge!!
    No you can't. You will gain control of the spell as it exists on the stack, only you will get to declare a new target
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on WER Log In Issues
    Are there any other judges that use WER for player lookups? I attempted to log in, but WER is not allowing me to. (Say invalid DCI # or password)
    Posted in: Third Party Products
  • posted a message on Emrakul + Volition Reins
    Not by casting Volition Reins. Auras require a target to be declared while on the stack, as Emrakul has protection from colored spells.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Missed Trigger clause for FNM
    The chart that you are talking about is to resolve mandatory triggers. As I posted, optional triggers are treated as if the controlling player declined them.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Missed Trigger clause for FNM
    Whenever a player misses the opportunity to use an optional trigger (ie; may abilities), they are assumed to have declined that trigger.

    Except from the IPG
    "If the trigger instruction is optional (“may”, or “up to X” where zero is a valid choice) and specifies no consequence for not doing it, assume that the player has chosen not to perform the instruction and issue no penalty."

    Technically no game error has occured, and the judge should have you continue the turn with you having declined the trigger.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [SCD] Mental Misstep
    Quote from skip430
    It's really not that great a card in standard. I'll be very surprised if I even see this as a sideboard card in top control decks that place in tournaments (cawblade/RuG). I also don't think it will even see play in non blue decks such as valakut, red decks, or boros, because it is simply too narrow.


    I don't think it's so narrow that it won't see competitive play. Enough top decks have cards that it counters to be worth it. In UW mirror where u want the extra counters, thats perfect against Spell Pierce. In the same match it gets Oust, Condemn, and Pre-Ordain.

    I think it is so narrow that FEW decks will use it, but I think unless there's a significant meta shift it is totally playable in top decks, especially control.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on [SCD] Mental Misstep
    Quote from mrtonyy
    does this counter a kicked goblin bushwhacker?


    Yes it will counter a kicked Goblin Bushwacker, as kicker is an additional cost that has no effect on CMC.

    While it has been clarified that it does not counter Green Sun's Zenith, it does present enough utility to be worth considering.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Is New Extended gonna become OverExtended?
    Quote from Sanduleak
    Wizards stated MANY TIMES that they will not remove the reserved list, they don't explain why, but it is clear than that is a firm decission and they will not change it no matter what we all think about it.

    The cost of entering Legacy is higher that standard just for one reason, packs.

    When was the last time you opened a Dual land in a pack?, for me I have to get back more than 10 years, I have opened 2 Jaces in packs in last year.

    The problem with prices is that the only way to get dual lands is buying them or trading for them (and that is only getting harder), standard staples are oppened in packs.

    A lot of people that played only standard and extended turned to legacy after last year rotation, that is one of the reasons for the skyrocketing prices of legacy staples.

    Yes, there are a lot of legacy decks that do not require duals, cards from the reserved list, FOW or Wasteland... well, maybe not that many decks.

    Usually people that remind me that "there are a lot of those decks" are the same people that never whould play those same decks, because they have the duals, FOW and Wastelands they need for their decks. If you look at recent tops from different tournaments, how many of those decks do you see?, not many, and that is just for a reason, they are not competitive enought to do something in a big tourney.

    Legacy has problems, real problems, maybe they are not clearly identified now but they will be in the future, and the time to do something is now, not in five or even two years.

    I will not talk about the problems in standard/extended, they have been adressed before in this same thread.


    To be fair, WotC did give a reason for not getting rid of the reserved list. They're explaination was if they could do nothing else, they wanted to be a company of their word. They committed to not printing those cards, and so they won't. I would expect major format changes in the next year or so because the new popularity of legacy (thanks SCG) is creating a price barrier for players to begin and continue playing competetive magic. And while WotC doesn't directly benefit from after-market sales, the benefit hugely by people wanting to sleeve up and play with paper.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.