- Abandon Hope
- Registered User
Member for 17 years and 22 days
Last active Sun, May, 22 2011 23:59:04
- 0 Followers
- 884 Total Posts
- 2 Thanks
Oct 17, 2009Abandon Hope posted a message on Manipulator Mafia signups (specialty) - game postponed/in.Posted in: Old Sign-ups
Oct 8, 2009Posted in: Mafia
No. Your votes are without basis. You just lynched me because too many people couldn't take the rational path and set their frustration with my play aside. It's a little funny. But I'm not going to claim because of a pile of votes for that reason.Quote from CyanI think you're doing the right thing here.
My unvote should be fine then, which puts AH at 4 votes.
Feel free to claim anytime, AH.
Oh wait Cyan, you say that isn't why you voted me? Okay. But I didn't know that, and you didn't elaborate, and now I'm dead.
@Jerubbaal: I should be lynched. It's the fair play. I'd be rather upset right now if I were any flavor of scum.
Oct 7, 2009Posted in: Mafia
Why? Judging as it sits now, that's just CYA. Are you ready to push this into a lynch just to end this day?Quote from SkanderI'm OK hammering PhantomS if everyone agrees.
I love how I'm the default here. Where did that vote come from? It seems to me that you're falling back to position you didn't previously occupy.Quote from CyanBlah..I'd honestly forgotten about that/ Unvote
Vote AH then. I just don't see PhantomS as scum.
Oct 5, 2009Posted in: Mafia
I'll quote you again.Quote from SkanderErr, what? I can't be rationalizing "a poorly thought out vote" with what I was saying, as I didn't vote in conjunction with the suggestion. I'm not sure what you're trying to suggest here.
This is taking the easy way out. Looking to give everyone a pass to stop thinking. Thats the poorly thought out vote. Should have said lynch for clairity.Quote from Skander »Az, I'm all for random-lynching from a group that displeases us. It seems we won't have a consensus otherwise.
Oct 5, 2009I'll make an exception for you, Skander. You OMGUS me on the basis that I should have voted someone else for the same behavior you demonstrated. Let me ask you this. Was the behavior scummy and therefore deserving of a vote? Or was it acceptable? In either case would you care to defend it? Turning this around on me is cool for you, because I'm an easy distraction due to my abrasive attitude. It neither excuses or explains your behavior.Posted in: Mafia
Furthermore, the agreement of an opportunist is far more severe than a snide suggestion of a frustrated player. Everyone's frustrated. Not everyone's trying to take advantage of that to rationalize a poorly thought out vote.
Oct 3, 2009Posted in: Mafia
Yes.Quote from Pale MageAre you two having the same conversation? I'm having difficulty following this.
Ok, I'll be obvious. Because I found Az more deserving of a vote. The disagreement would be: I disagree that Kraj/Kpaca should be our priority. But I'm Unvote: Azraeling in light of this:Quote from ZasZ234 »@Abandon Hope:
Your post started with a reply to the second answer. Please reply to the question you skipped: "If you didn't disagree with the wagon against Kraj, then why would you vote Azrael over Kraj?"
It's you. Vote: Skander. Also, I can't believe that led to that.Quote from Skander »Az, I'm all for random-lynching from a group that displeases us. It seems we won't have a consensus otherwise.
Sep 29, 2009Posted in: Mafia
Wait, were you calling Xyre's lynch fast? Momentum may be related to, but is not the same as acceleration.
You agree that the wagon is slow, but you earlier criticised its momentum (and in result placed the vote you maintain). So your attack was founded on a false premise, right?
Yet I don't see you unvote. How do you explain that?
Also why did you decide not to take part in our little exercise to record our opinions?
And, please, be more precise with your language! I don't want to wonder again which question a particular standalone "No" stands for. It only will end up in me asking for clarification. If you don't want to answer a question twice, I guess, you don't want to clarify it multiple times either.
With smilies? I wouldn't call that a record of opinion.
Sep 28, 2009Posted in: Mafia
Ok. No was a reponse to your question. I didn't and don't think there is any reason for Kraj/Kpaca to be a foregone conclusion. I meant, you're right, it does seem slow. Self review for failure there.
Is the "No" meant as an answer to my question? If so, then I'm confused. If not, then please answer it!
Also "You're right, it doesn't seem slow" is contradicting itself since I just opposed it having a high velocity in the post you quoted.
Sep 24, 2009Posted in: Mafia
No. He doesn't have to be a goner. You're right, it doesn't seem slow, but that's been rectified with a replacement.
I mean, I agree that he's probably a goner. But that seems justified since he lashed out against any of his attackers and really put nothing forward to back up the votes.
Other than that the wagon actually is almost slow for the actions commited, e. g. I would have expected Cyan to react to it sooner.
It may seem fast to someone who only glances over the thread twice a week though. You probably don't realise the vast amount of (prod-worthy *hint*) time that has passed in which Kraj did not manage to answer due to the low posting frequency in general.
Sep 20, 2009Posted in: Mafia
Actually, I've been thinking more about what Xyre actually got lynched for. I don't get it. You asked me what was the fatal flaw. That he got lynched for? Don't know. Never understood. The points against him could only be described as mild. In the arguments against him? There wasn't one. Mild things put reasonably, but nothing damning. Xyre answered for himself just fine. Why it wasn't enough I don't know. Where I should have jumped in with a "this point is wrong because of this"? Haha, you're talking to the wrong person. But the point's not that I'm lazy, the point's that you're looking at it the wrong way. Why'd you do it? Why didn't you stop it? I'm terribly afraid we're going to lynch someone out of momentum again. And yes, you're to blame for that, yesterday and today. Vote: Azrael.Quote from AzraelAH, you never responded to this post:
But back to the post you asked for an answer to... I don't see a question.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.