My unvote should be fine then, which puts AH at 4 votes.
Feel free to claim anytime, AH.
No. Your votes are without basis. You just lynched me because too many people couldn't take the rational path and set their frustration with my play aside. It's a little funny. But I'm not going to claim because of a pile of votes for that reason.
Oh wait Cyan, you say that isn't why you voted me? Okay. But I didn't know that, and you didn't elaborate, and now I'm dead.
@Jerubbaal: I should be lynched. It's the fair play. I'd be rather upset right now if I were any flavor of scum.
Err, what? I can't be rationalizing "a poorly thought out vote" with what I was saying, as I didn't vote in conjunction with the suggestion. I'm not sure what you're trying to suggest here.
I'll quote you again.
Quote from Skander »
Az, I'm all for random-lynching from a group that displeases us. It seems we won't have a consensus otherwise.
This is taking the easy way out. Looking to give everyone a pass to stop thinking. Thats the poorly thought out vote. Should have said lynch for clairity.
I'll make an exception for you, Skander. You OMGUS me on the basis that I should have voted someone else for the same behavior you demonstrated. Let me ask you this. Was the behavior scummy and therefore deserving of a vote? Or was it acceptable? In either case would you care to defend it? Turning this around on me is cool for you, because I'm an easy distraction due to my abrasive attitude. It neither excuses or explains your behavior.
Furthermore, the agreement of an opportunist is far more severe than a snide suggestion of a frustrated player. Everyone's frustrated. Not everyone's trying to take advantage of that to rationalize a poorly thought out vote.
Are you two having the same conversation? I'm having difficulty following this.
Yes.
Quote from ZasZ234 »
@Abandon Hope:
Your post started with a reply to the second answer. Please reply to the question you skipped: "If you didn't disagree with the wagon against Kraj, then why would you vote Azrael over Kraj?"
Ok, I'll be obvious. Because I found Az more deserving of a vote. The disagreement would be: I disagree that Kraj/Kpaca should be our priority. But I'm Unvote: Azraeling in light of this:
Quote from Skander »
Az, I'm all for random-lynching from a group that displeases us. It seems we won't have a consensus otherwise.
It's you. Vote: Skander. Also, I can't believe that led to that.
If you didn't disagree with the wagon against Kraj, then why would you vote Azrael over Kraj?
You agree that the wagon is slow, but you earlier criticised its momentum (and in result placed the vote you maintain). So your attack was founded on a false premise, right?
Yet I don't see you unvote. How do you explain that?
Also why did you decide not to take part in our little exercise to record our opinions?
And, please, be more precise with your language! I don't want to wonder again which question a particular standalone "No" stands for. It only will end up in me asking for clarification. If you don't want to answer a question twice, I guess, you don't want to clarify it multiple times either.
greetings
Z
Wait, were you calling Xyre's lynch fast? Momentum may be related to, but is not the same as acceleration.
With smilies? I wouldn't call that a record of opinion.
Your response doesn't make sense in light of the post you responded to.
Is the "No" meant as an answer to my question? If so, then I'm confused. If not, then please answer it!
Also "You're right, it doesn't seem slow" is contradicting itself since I just opposed it having a high velocity in the post you quoted.
Ok. No was a reponse to your question. I didn't and don't think there is any reason for Kraj/Kpaca to be a foregone conclusion. I meant, you're right, it does seem slow. Self review for failure there.
So you do disagree with the wagon against Kraj today, right?
I mean, I agree that he's probably a goner. But that seems justified since he lashed out against any of his attackers and really put nothing forward to back up the votes.
Other than that the wagon actually is almost slow for the actions commited, e. g. I would have expected Cyan to react to it sooner.
It may seem fast to someone who only glances over the thread twice a week though. You probably don't realise the vast amount of (prod-worthy *hint*) time that has passed in which Kraj did not manage to answer due to the low posting frequency in general.
greetings
Z
No. He doesn't have to be a goner. You're right, it doesn't seem slow, but that's been rectified with a replacement.
Actually, I've been thinking more about what Xyre actually got lynched for. I don't get it. You asked me what was the fatal flaw. That he got lynched for? Don't know. Never understood. The points against him could only be described as mild. In the arguments against him? There wasn't one. Mild things put reasonably, but nothing damning. Xyre answered for himself just fine. Why it wasn't enough I don't know. Where I should have jumped in with a "this point is wrong because of this"? Haha, you're talking to the wrong person. But the point's not that I'm lazy, the point's that you're looking at it the wrong way. Why'd you do it? Why didn't you stop it? I'm terribly afraid we're going to lynch someone out of momentum again. And yes, you're to blame for that, yesterday and today. Vote: Azrael.
But back to the post you asked for an answer to... I don't see a question.
Oh wait Cyan, you say that isn't why you voted me? Okay. But I didn't know that, and you didn't elaborate, and now I'm dead.
@Jerubbaal: I should be lynched. It's the fair play. I'd be rather upset right now if I were any flavor of scum.
I love how I'm the default here. Where did that vote come from? It seems to me that you're falling back to position you didn't previously occupy.
Furthermore, the agreement of an opportunist is far more severe than a snide suggestion of a frustrated player. Everyone's frustrated. Not everyone's trying to take advantage of that to rationalize a poorly thought out vote.
With smilies? I wouldn't call that a record of opinion.
But back to the post you asked for an answer to... I don't see a question.