- SorryGuy
- Registered User
-
Member for 19 years, 3 months, and 22 days
Last active Thu, Jul, 18 2013 21:48:36
- 0 Followers
- 10,298 Total Posts
- 1 Thank
-
Dec 2, 2007SorryGuy posted a message on My Susan Lucci MomentBecause we don't have enough gold ones already, silver it should be!Posted in: Alacar's Design Zone
-
Jan 23, 2007SorryGuy posted a message on Blog Forum Mistake? Current Music?A majority of them are by Kevin Shields, yeah. The rest are more or less attempts to sound like My Bloody Valentine, with some successes. There are some exceptions that don't work great, though, notably Phoenix's Too Young.Posted in: sneakyh's Blog
-
Jan 22, 2007SorryGuy posted a message on i got home from workWhat are you wearing right now, eh? I might just stop by.Posted in: the best blog
-
Jan 22, 2007SorryGuy posted a message on Blog Forum Mistake? Current Music?The soundtrack from Lost in Translation. The song Girls by Death in Vegas has been played particularly often.Posted in: sneakyh's Blog
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I believe you mean SATs or ACTs. For the APs, you get to send them to one school.
In regards to the poll, I voted for Locke. As screwed up as some of the people had it, he was handicap and truly lonely.
You won't get it from me. The Field was hyped beyond belief and the music doesn't do much for me. We Were Dead Before the Boat Even Sank sounded horrible to me, although I will admit I haven't heard the entire album. The rest of the list is also pretty accurate although I will say my biggest disappointment probably was the Interpol album, I think no one character describes Interpol's career better than: \.
I think the number of you that enjoy Foo Fighters is a little scary. I'll admit The Pretender was a pretty good single and they are decent band, but I can't say I feel they deserve the attention they are getting here.
Also, Xyre, Battles, really? Almost as bad as the PB/AC thing.
1. Neon Bible - Arcade Fire: Epic in every single way. In my book it is a classic. I am confident I will be listening to it in ten years; while it is condemnation of our world today, its message really is eternal.
2. Boxer - The National: I think it is probably the best album of the year, even if I did not have the emotional with it as I did with Neon Bible. Musically it is the best thing they have done and the voice can not be beat.
3. The Good, the Bad, & the Queen - The Good, the Bad, & the Queen: It sounds great. Really, really great.
4. In Rainbows - Radiohead: The least challenging thing Radiohead has done in recent memory shows that Radiohead is capable of simply being a good band.
5. Leaves in the River - Sea Wolf: I have no idea why these guys have no been discovered yet, but the sound is pretty impressive and some of the best melancholy I have heard all year.
6. In Our Bedroom After the War - Stars: It has an intimate feel to it and voices that make it the best pop album of the year.
7. Andorra - Caribou: Again, it simply sounds really good to me and has a really lost quality to it that doesn't go too overboard (The Field, much?) but does give you a sort of sublime feeling.
8. American Gangster - Jay-Z: Not relying on inane hooks like pretty much everyone else in hip-hop today, the album actually showcases rapping. The rapping being clever and skillful doesn't hurt either.
9. Sound of Silver - LCD Soundsystem - This really does go to the two songs in the middle, respectively the third and first best songs of the year. The rest of the album does deliver though, even if the rest does not succeed to the lengths of "Someone Great" and "All My Friends."
10. Graduation - Kanye West - The opposite of Jay-Z, while not as skilled in actual rapping, the technical skill and the production here were amazing.
Black Kids' EP would be here except that it is an EP and all. So, how about all of you? And please don't give me the "there is no good music these days" until you have heard at least my top two albums.
People go offline for the holidays. I'm sure it will go back up.
My highest is 44, I'm around 37-38 though.
At any rate, thank you all for the welcome. It seems very warm.
At any rate, after seeing how you guys are pretty much sweeping and annihilating all of the forum award nominations, I figured I would come over here and read. It was a pretty worthwhile experience, I assure you. But as I was reading, I found a quote that I had seen earlier today that alarmed as much as it did the first time:
I was wondering if you could elaborate or explain why you feel this way, ethersphere. I would have PMed you on it, but several people here seemed to echo the comments so I figured I would ask you all as a whole. Thanks guys.
At any rate, I will be turning off my television if it becomes a reality in the new year. What a sad state that would be. And with it being pilot season, the effects will likely stretch into next season if it goes on a decent duration. And think of what late night is going to become right away.
On thing I'm not really clear on and that a quick Google search did not turn up that you might know Mikey: Have scripts been written for shows that premiere at non-standard times? I am referring specifically to Lost. With a February launch, it seems that some may have been written already?
Just now. In the future PM me if you so desire.
As it is condescending in tone and implies superiority. I also do not really think the poster's attitude was all that disrespectful. The content, maybe. But the attitude? Not so much.
Also implies bad things; quite obviously I do believe. I also do not think that supporting others ideas should be against the rules.
This is worse than the above two in that again it is absolutely the wrong tone.
But the action that really gets me, Caselogik, is how you handled post 87. Going through a user's post and marking every instance of sarcasm not only fails to make sense but it violates the very user-to-user mutual respect you are suggesting. Had it been marking flames, maybe I could see it. But you were marking sarcasm. As in a tone used as a part of discourse. There is nothing in the rules against this. Further, the examples that you marked are not even examples of sarcasm.
I also do not like how you responded to Themchops' argument and then basically said the discussion needed to come to an end. That implies a "I'm right because I have authority and you are wrong because you don't" sort of idea that no one wants to push.
Overall, the entire thread is disturbing. Even Annorax with the little 'Infraction seconded' notes seems unorthodox and unnecessary. Moderate on the rules, not on your feelings (if you need help with that, I do believe templates like [mod4*] and the ilk still exist). None of the infractions in that thread are marked for what rules they broke, they are marked with little antagonist notes. That's not acceptable and needs to change. Sorry if you take all of this as a disrespect Caselogik but I believe the phrase goes along the lines of I'll respect you once you earn it.
Yeah, that really doesn't sound right to me as it continues to get closer and closer to the coast. I'm only marginally worried for myself as there is really no where more central than Bay Park, but I do have a number of friends who have been/will be evacuated.
And with the winds not ending anytime soon, it is easily going to be worse than the Cedar Fire. Which worries me quite a bit considering how long it took to recover from that.
Actually I don't think he even missed the joke. I think we was saying that he felt it was offensive to ridicule people for not using proper grammar.
But really SapphireTri, why do you try and start things like this? At the very least, clarify what people are saying first.