- Registered User
Member for 10 years, 3 months, and 14 days
Last active Tue, Feb, 8 2011 12:37:52
- 0 Followers
- 212 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
Dec 19, 2010Lardalish posted a message on [MBS] Arcana Art -- Karn, Thrun, Tezzeret, and Maybe Glissa? (plus many others)Well, I know I saw someone say that the Tez art with the phyrexian buddies was Fat Pack Box art (not sure if thats true or just speculation) but the Karn art looks about the same ratio, maybe thats the other side of the box?Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Dec 14, 2010Lardalish posted a message on [MBS] Arcana Art -- Karn, Thrun, Tezzeret, and Maybe Glissa? (plus many others)Man, I dont think I realized how much I missed Phyrexians!Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Sooo... does that poison symbol generally mean they have Infect? Or just allied with the phyrexians? Because Im terrified if that is a Darksteel creature with Infect.
Nov 28, 2010Ok, so Im trying to decide between a tap-out or a permission style deck so I worked out a permission and then I worked out a tap-out. Heres the tap-out I worked up:Posted in: Standard Archives
DeckMagic OnlineOCTGN2ApprenticeBuy These Cards Threats
2 Frost Titan
2 Grave Titan
3 Abyssal Persecutor
3 Mimic Vat
3 Everflowing Chalice
3 Jace's Ingenuity
3 Inquisition of Kozilek
3 Consuming Vapors
1 Volition Reins
3 Jace the Mindsculptor
25 lands I havent dedcided on
When I "finished" the core of the deck I noticed something. I hadn't put any counters in there! Now I know that if I want to run tap-out control (which seems like it would be more my playstyle anyway) that I would run fewer counters than a permission, but I should still run some right?
I think I would like 4-6 counters, which is a lot of cards to pull out and Im not sure where to trim it up. I almost want to say I need to cut the Mimic Vats and the Chalices, but the vat is really good and the chalice helps me lay my threats earlier and more consistantly.
I dunno, like I said I don't really know what to take out, can anyone offer some suggestions?
Oct 20, 2010Posted in: Standard ArchivesQuote from otisAlso, for liliana's specter on a vat can't they respond by playing their card?
"In response Ill cast Mana Leak... oh wait..."
"In response Ill cast Primeval Titan...oh wait..."
etc etc, sure they can play some of them, but there is not a ton of stuff that they can play in response and have it actually do something. Against Red you might want to be a little more careful, but forcing them to play the spell right then instead of waiting can be pretty good.
Jul 24, 2010Ok, so Ive been fiddling with this and sadly I have yet to test it (working nights and weekends doesnt give me much time to test and such), but it seems pretty solid. Goldfishing looks solid to me, but thats never a great way to test.Posted in: Standard Archives
DeckMagic OnlineOCTGN2ApprenticeBuy These Cards Creatures (13)
3 Nantuko Shade
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
3 Grave Titan
3 Abyssal Persecutor
4 Consuming Vapors
4 Sign in Blood
4 Tendril's Of Corruption
3 Mind Sludge
2 Crystal Ball
2 Liliana Vess
1 Sorin Markov
3 Tectonic Edge
2 Malakir Bloodwitch
4 Vampire Hexmage
1 Consume the Meek
3 Sadistic Sacrament
1 Haunting Echoes
So yeah, what do you guys think? The Sideboard is who know,s I honestly dont know what Im doin with that, heh. So any and all suggestions / critiques / comments are welcome!
Jul 23, 2010Posted in: Standard ArchivesQuote from KadrecThis is what I'm planning on running right now. I just got my new M11 toys (minus Grave Titans, which I'm not shelling out for right now), and this should be quite resilient against everything in my local meta. However, it's difficult for me to test this against something like Super Friends, as no one in the area has shelled out the money to build it (nor will they). This has "Outs" against everything I can think of, including Eldrazi (plenty of Sac effects, plus 2 Brittle Effigies), can handle Plainswalkers (clumsily, but All is Dust, sided Hexmages and Duress), and it should have enough removal to keep most aggro on the back foot until I can stabilize. I do have one Haunting Echoes to handle a couple of the local players who like to shuffle their graveyard back into the library and reuse everything, which can be tutored up with Liliana before they get too far into their decks, as well.
I used to use a pair of Sadistic Sacraments in the sideboard, and won almost every game that they showed up early in, as I could remove the biggest threats from my opponents' decks. I'm thinking I can get away without them, now, though.
Kozilek is a terrible choice. You dont have any ramp so you would have to wait till turn 10 to play him, and thats assuming you dont miss a land drop.
With Cosi youve got 6 wincons? Maybe? Id add some more and take Cosi out. I run 4 titans, two persecutors and 4 shades. I know you said you didnt want to shell out for the titans, so maybe something else. Nightmares? Seems kinda vanilla, but its certainly a budget option.
Jul 19, 2010Ok so I felt like whippin up an MBC and heres my take on itPosted in: Standard Archives
With gatekeeper and vapors and liliana to tutor em, I think Ive got enough outs for the persecutor.
Never played MBC before but I got my roommate to help me hammer out a list, any and all critiques and comments are welcome!
May 2, 2010Posted in: Standard ArchivesQuote from odorofdeathHow does Kozileks predator help you win with Ascension out? Sure it comes out earlier but it only gives you one spawn, dies to bolt, and generates no more CA past the initial token. Rapacious One DOESNT die to bolt, is bigger and therefore harder to block, and is a must answer threat for your opponent. If they dont kill him quickly, you will have a constant stream of tokens. If they do kill him, then who cares. Hes just an means to an ends, not the ends itself. And as for the hatcher, I think we have enough fire-and-forget token generators in brood birthing, growth spasm and nest invader. Rapacious One is a constant source of advantage and while this makes him a target, like I said before, hes just a means to an ends, not the ends itself.
The predator makes two tokens.
So if he dies to bolt then oh well, you got two spawns out of it. He has an immediate board presence with those spawns. Granted he does die to bolt and One doesnt, but One does die to any other removal. So if you play predator and he dies to removal you still got two spawns, if One dies to removal then you got nothing.
May 2, 2010Posted in: Standard ArchivesQuote from odorofdeathAscension is pretty much your best win con in this deck. Monument is cut for getting you blockers or something, but an army of 1/2 flying spawn isnt exactly what i'd call an alpha strike. I would take out the mights, there not needed. Also swap the birds for 3 BBE's they are great in this deck (surprise), usually digging out an awakening zone or ascension. Also -4 kozileks predator for +4 awakening zone, and -3 hatcher for +1 bolt and +2 rapacious one. Hatcher is too slow, as is predator.
I find it funny that you say hatcher and predator are too slow and yet you tell me to run Rapacious One, which costs more, has a good chance of dying before he makes anything, and doesnt help you win with ascension nearly as fast as hatcher and predator do.
I put the mights in for a little bit of a combat trick since this deck doesnt really have any of that other than bolt. Though I could see taking it out for a couple zones.
I would like to run BBE, but Im not sure about taking out the birds for em. This deck is slow to get out the door so Id like the accel in there. Ill try it out with the elves though.
May 2, 2010Ok, Ive done a little tinkering and heres what Ive got now. Havent tested this set up, but Ill probably play my roommate some later today.Posted in: Standard Archives
DeckMagic OnlineOCTGN2ApprenticeBuy These Cards Spells 21
4 Brood Birthing
4 Beastmaster's Ascension
3 Eldrazi Monument
3 Growth Spasm
3 Lightning Bolt
2 Might of the Masses
2 Garruk Wildspeaker
3 Birds of Paradise
4 Nest Invader
4 Kozilek's Predator
3 Emrakul's Hatcher
2 Siege-Gang Commander
4 Rootbound Crag
2 Raging Ravine
1 Lightning Bolt
2 Burst Lightning
I added two Might of the Masses to give me a little bit of a tricksy side, it could let me slide around blockers, or turn a bad block into a profitable one, but like I said I havent tested it so Im not sure.
Added three bolts, I think thats a pretty solid change there.
Upped the ascensions to 4 and took Garruk down to two, Garruk is nice and I still want him in the deck, but the ascension is better. Maybe Ill have somethin in the side to replace the ascensions when I go up against vamps? I dunno.
Still not sure what to do with a sideboard. Ive got a few cards there that I think will help but who knows.
Apr 28, 2010I dont care for rapacious one because he's slow, I run Siege-Gang Commander over him, he makes more tokens right when he comes in and he can shock away problems.Posted in: Standard Archives
As for your deck, you don't have enough token producers. Most of the decks I see run 4 invaders (which youve got there), 4 predator, and 4 hatchers. Those guys power out tokens like no ones business. Basically how we get so many tokens is T1 forest birds, T2 land invader / spasm, T3 land, birthing x2 for 6 or birthing and predator for 4 tokens and a 3/3, then turn 4 you drop a hatcher for three, or if you've got the tokens, just drop an ascension for the win.
Apr 25, 2010Posted in: Standard Archives
Heres my take. I really dont care for Raid Bombardment in here because it doesnt do enough for it. I like the Ascension better for that ability. You can trigger it at once for a much bigger effect and the same mana cost. I might consider it sideboard tech against vamps since they run hex mages, but I wouldnt main deck it.
Also: I like Garruk for the overrun ability / fog that he serves as. The ramp is just a nice bonus.
Im a little unsure of Awakening Zone in here. It seems fantastic, but its slow and I rarely find myself wanting to cast it when Ive got other cards in hand. It does cancel out the monuments drawback though which is kinda nice. Dont know what Id put in in place of it though.
I dunno, I need to do some testing against people and not just drawing hands and playing them out by myself.
Apr 20, 2010Yeah, each level up creature starts at level "0" and when you pay the cost they go up one level.Posted in: New Card Discussion
The idea is that you can use that mana thats just sitting around to do somethin. The problem is, in the standard environment we have now, its just too slow. I played the levelers in limited and they are amazing, they can turn a game around. But like I said, the format is too fast so you usually cant afford to spend the mana. Maybe once Alara rotates they will be more useable.
Apr 20, 2010I was working on a similar deck idea actually. Not sold on my deck list and Im aiming for a more competitive build (which may or may not be possible), but here it is so far!Posted in: New Card Discussion
Simple concept, make a bunch of spawn tokens, usin em to ramp as you go, then kill you opponent with em through either Monument, Warden, Bombardment, Garruk, or just Hand of Emrakul.
With this you can get the hand out on turn three, swinging for 7 annihilator 1 turn 4 is kinda hard to deal with.
I need to cut 2 cards, and like I said, Im not sure if I like the card choices as they are.
Mar 26, 2010Posted in: Rumor Mill ArchiveQuote from Forgotten_HopeI was using the term pants loosely. Whatever her bottoms are, her stomach is hanging over them.
Ok, thats just not right at all.
You drew the "pants" to the edges of the wings. Which is certainly not where her waistline goes.
Through a combination of bad lighting and those dark wings, it looks like her waist is much bigger than it actually is. Shes actually perfectly fit and proportioned like pretty much any other angel.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.