I'm very disappointed they didn't take the opportunity to errata her to give her a class of either Warrior, Barbarian, or Berserker. Sometimes functional errata is a good thing.
When I started getting into Magic, Gatherer comments were incredibly useful and informative and helped me find links and synergies between cards I'd have no way of knowing about being a new player. Since comments and the rating systems have been defunct, I've barely visited Gatherer since. I hope they come back, for my and all new player's sake.
I still use it when I'm searching for a certai keyword or a tribe when creating themed EDH decks. Miss the comments and especially ratings dearly. And still always amused by people who bother to say "gatherer is up" after every expansion's release.
It's because a majority of magic players use gatherer to look up cards because it is reliable and official.
Gee whiz should have just printed it at common GAWD Wizards why so greedy GAWD!?!?
Actually, I only buy singles. But if it were common, it'd be an incentive for me to actually buy a box, because I make lots of tribal decks and could use A LOT of there.
I wish a card that I would put into most of my Commander decks was easier to obtain than Mythic. Kind of a jerk move, really. But at least it's reprinted at all and will be a little easier to get.
I wonder if they went with Karplusan Forest and Underground River because they both were in the Deckmasters set, thus have the most copies already out there? Hmmmmm.
And no U/W dual among them? Double "hmmmm".
It's quite possible those cycles are all complete, they just aren't confirmed. Unless one of the sources specifically say they aren't in it.
"We now believe that The Official Reprint Policy (known colloquially as the "reserved list") has resulted in a barrier to players new and old for various formats, and, as such, we will be repealing it, effective immediately. The original intention of the list was for some early printed cards to retain their resale value, but all it is doing at this point is preventing us from reprinting many old cards for nostalgia value, as most of the cards on the list have little monetary value despite the policy, and we feel the cards that currently have a high value would be unaffected by newer printings as the originals would still retain their value with collectors due to the cards limited print numbers."
But what about Chrome?
Actually, I only buy singles. But if it were common, it'd be an incentive for me to actually buy a box, because I make lots of tribal decks and could use A LOT of there.
Ok... so why is it saddening to you?
Why is it sad? More people having access to the card doesn't make yours any less playable.
What about for things that aren't popular?
It's quite possible those cycles are all complete, they just aren't confirmed. Unless one of the sources specifically say they aren't in it.
Can people stop using "strictly worse" wrong, please?
Reminds me of my favorite Archer, Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen. :/
(edited "strictly better" to "strictly worse")
I don't think you know what that means.
Wizards of the Coast...should say this.