Pretty beefy size and stats to ensure it will be useful in standard.
If you ever get to simply reset your life to 10 , that alone can be enough for a control deck to take over.
It does compete with Lyra and other crazy pushed white 5 drops , but flash is something that could justify its inclusion.
- Registered User
Member for 10 years, 1 month, and 7 days
Last active Mon, Mar, 18 2019 19:49:49
- 1 Follower
- 4,586 Total Posts
- 592 Thanks
Jan 8, 2019Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Thats how its played in like 99.9% of the cases, as its the most intuitive way.
Using counters would allow the cards to still be playable if the enchantment is removed and you play another.
Just like it works with Karn.
But frankly, using the pesky counters on exiled cards is annoying , really annoying, so lots of players just dont use the counters and put the cards under karn instead (and only use the counters when it matters, because karn leaves the battlefield etc.).
Jan 8, 2019Boring card, but all its modes are not overcosted and its flexible enough to justify inclusion, even as a 4x.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
With the 2 mana option it will work with Teferi and that alone would be a reason to see it in standard.
Outside of standard, this is just not efficient enough.
Jan 7, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from OathboundOne »Anyone remember the days when a 4/3 flying, vigilance, pseudo-hexproof for 4 mana wasn't ridiculed for being too weak/plain/boring/underpowered? At uncommon, even.
In original Ravnica we got Moroii and it was pretty bomby.
The classic 4/4 flying Air Elemental is always good in Limited, across all Limited sets ever.
Card is still very odd, as its so similar to the hexproof one and it seems to be so out of place for the Azorius Guild as a generic flyer.
Jan 7, 2019The card requires work and when it works, its cool.Posted in: New Card Discussion
But there are countless hands in which it does as good as nothing and thats bad.
its 1RR to get 1 miserly damage out of it, so thats not a real plan.
You really want to cast it for X=0 , RR and get some business spells rolling.
But stuffing your deck with Suspend spells and this, hoping you draw them both (which is not that great even if you run both 4 times).
Simply put, its not great.
It also does not combo well with Cascade spells, as you want to "tutor" your 0 mana spell with them and this bricks them at 2 mana (unless you have one in hand, but thats much worse than playing cascade to get them for you).
Jan 3, 2019It combos with almost anything that Birthing Pod combos with.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
That combo worked in Standard, you can easily make this completely broken in EDH as you just win when you untap.
So chances are this will get BANNED immediately on release as it should be.
In any format, it is a combo card that needs to get haste to combo right away, chances are it wont survive that turn (modern / legacy) and its simply too slow.
But in the end, if this does its job, its never "fair".
Jan 3, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Wraithe »
It doesn't punish you for its "gimmick". It straight up rewards you for playing a tribal deck. There are even more extreme versions of this kind of reward, that do things like sweep the board of creatures not of a tribe. This is a similar effect. It's a tribal card that statistically rewards you for a certain board state and playing... a tribal deck. A very common type of deck to put cards in to gain rewards for being tribal. Cards that are, by and large, sufficiently inferior to not be worth consideration outside of a tribal deck. This is the nature of tribal cards. Always has been, always will be.
Read exactly what i said.
No matter what, you at best get a 50/50 coinflip to destroy a creature.
If that is your "reward" then its terrible, thats not a reward at all.
If this kills your creature and non of theirs, its downright terrible, and no matter what, thats going to happen, as you simply will not have 100% of the creature types it asks for in Limited.
See, here is where lines are crossed. It might very well make you feel bad, and you can absolutely speak for yourself, regarding your own thoughts and feelings about such things. You cannot, however, simply assert that an effect like this blanket makes everyone miserable; that is projection, plain and simple. Clearly, there is a solid enough subset of an audience for random element cards that can potentially give higher than normal rewards with said random element in exchange for potentially less value, and that rewards you more the better you stack the odds in your favor, for WotC to consistently make cards like this, and for people to regularly express joy at their very existence.
Exactly, everyone has some cards they like. Thats exactly why they exist, and thats exactly why i claim it will divide the playerbase in either hating this card to the bones, or they enjoy the randomness of cards occasionally doing nothing simply because of randomness.
And there is also a challenge, and a skill level, associated with successfully using a card with fixed statistical odds like this as heavily into your favor as possible. For example, a Hell-tribal Commander deck that plays this might very well kill huge numbers of creatures over the course of a game, as the odds get stacked in your favor periodically, and I would wager very good money there are plenty of people who would get a kick out of timing this version of Rakdos to maximize the odds they destroy a large number of creatures on the board.
You cant change the fact its a coinflip (outside of very specific flip again cards obviously).
Its a random effect, if people like that, good, i just explained why people absolutely despite this kind of randomness that is that swingy and easily decides the outcome of a game by a bunch of coinflips and no proper decision making or skill involved at all (you can only make it worse for yourself by making fundamentally bad choices).
And this, too, is more projecting than anything else. Just because you, personally (and clearly stated), cannot stand cards with this kind of random element, does not, in fact, always tilt the playerbase, nor make for a bad play experience. It makes for a bad play experience for you. And you are the only person you can in actuality speak for regarding this.
Its equally just you projecting, so neither can claim to have any better position.
I really really hate if people claim to talk "in fact" when they are just talking of their very own subjective opinion.
Your opinion is not a fact, its just your opinion.
And if our little dialog isnt the very best PROOF that this card is "in fact" tilting the playerbase, then what is ?
Jan 3, 2019This fights with Siege-Gang Commander in the 5-slot and does even somewhat comparable things.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
if you untap with this and they dont have removal, you probably win reasonable easy, especially if you have 8 mana to use it twice (or combo it with some of the simic stuff to reduce the cost even further of the activated ability).
However, with all the point removal this format has and especially constructed, this will die on sight and thats all about it, so giving it haste has the added bonus that it can kill a planeswaker.
Jan 3, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Wraithe »Just like good plays that help you try to manipulate statistics to get the cards you need from your deck, this card rewards you for stacking the odds in your favor.
The point is, the card doesnt really reward you, it actively PUNISHES you for not playing with its gimmick and even if you do everything you can, its still a 50/50 coinflip to either do NOTHING or destroy a creature.
Its just every time a feel bad moment, for either you or the opponent, this card has no winner, it makes everything and everyone miserable (and if that was the goal to designing this card, congrats).
Every magic card has the inherent randomness of the library, there is nothing to remove that.
Adding MORE randomness to a card, just for the sake of randomness is not good.
There is no denial that a subset of players enjoys adding as many randomness to the game as possible. The more random the better for them.
But these players rarely if ever care for winning at all, you dont want that kind of randomness if you want to expect the game to have a skill involved.
Anyway, its the kind of card that will always tilt the playerbase either to absolutely HATE it, or just embrace the randomness of it.
And it will lead to the kind of frustrating moments that make players totally tilt at a table, thats simply not a good experience at all.
Jan 3, 2019TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on Basilica Bell-Haunt (Draftaholics Anonymous preview)This could easily have Afterlife 2 and it would be decent.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
As it is, this feels totally out of place for its mana cost.
Jan 3, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from thatmarkguy »
...we play a game where we shuffle our decks. In any given game, win or lose at any given instant can be largely tied to the luck of the draw. It's not like we're playing chess here. Throughout every game, chance influences outcome.
Its a whole different kind of random.
If you make a sound decision what to play from your hand, you know what will happen, thats why you make the decision to play the card in the first place.
Drawing cards is random, but that doesnt change any decision you make, you make your decisions based on what you draw.
If a card has a random effect when played, its truely just random, it either wins or loses, you cant do anything to influence that outcome, its just literally a coinflip. Thats the absolute nightmare scenario for any SPIKE player , as it has absolutely nothing to do with Skill at all, its just the worst form of randomness you can add to a game that wants to mark itself as any form of skill-based.
This card will just randomly decide games in Limited, and for that alone i already hate it to the bones.
Jan 3, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from mapccu »
There is nothing generic about coin flipping on a constructed playable body - that is a lazy criticism imho. On average he's going to come in and eat half your opponents creatures, less for you if you build properly. He will never sac himself.
It's not like BR has zero tools to handle what's left over...
I think this will show up. It's a great effect and recurring this off eldest reborn (super doable) is going to absolutely back breaking a lot of the time.
Worst case scenario if I lose every flip I get a 6/6 flying trample for 6. That's fine. even if he eats one dude he is doing more than his cmc would suggest. ravenous chupacabra is 2 mana less for a 2/2 body. Granted it's targeted removal - but it's one shot on a mediocre body. Chupa is plenty playable and I think this will be too.
This rakdos is really just a 6/6 flyer for 4RB , and it kills randomly stuff.
Thats nothing new, nothing special, its just a generic big creature.
That does in no way mean its a "bad" card to play, its far from that, as its an easy to splash card for any deck in limited and its also just value to play in constructed (while the "random" really really becomes annoying as hell in any reasonable tournament setting, when your win/lose depends on a coinflip, thats just terrible, and for that alone i deeply hate this card and design space).
Compared to the 2nd iteration of Rakdos, Lord of Riots, this is incredible boring.
At least the Riots Rakdos asked for actual deep commitment to Rakdos in its manacost. Even the mechanic was basically Spectacle and delivered a very unique effect to make everything almost free to play , while providing a very undercosted huge body.
Simply put, it did something "special", rather than a generic flyer that just kills stuff randomly and might be a complete party pooper, when he destroys nothing and you just lose because of it.
Jan 3, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Guesswork »I don't mind that they're making Rakdos into the Timmy guild this time. Rakdos v.1 (hellbent) was pretty Johnny, and Rakdos v.2 (unleash) was definitely Spike. So, kind of a nice trilogy, in fact.
Having Mr. Rakdos be a big, dumb coin flip card that goes boom is a very Timmy thing. I'm OK with all that.
But why does this card operate on the variable of creature types, instead of, like... almost anything else? Rakdos as a guild has never cared about tribal anything, as far as I can remember. I would have liked to see a different build-around. CMC? Power? Tapped/untapped? Any of those would have felt more "Rakdos". So, I rather dislike this card because it just doesn't feel like it plays with the guild. Had it been another B/R Demon in another set... sure.
The very first Rakdos the Defiler did care for demons.
Caring for creature types is more for flavor and forcing some form of collective tribal as it would be one.
They do the same for sea-creatures if they spell them out as it would be just 1 tribe:
Also happens in Innistrad when they collect the "monster" creature types:
Victim of Night
Its bad as the text is noisy , but what else do you want to do, as they have creature types that are specific.
Its like they named "human" and "humanoid" creature types and spelled them all out (like dwarfs, elves, orcs, etc.).
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe deal with being in public and somewhat called "harassment" (and i clearly distinquish between a from a court defined harassment and a person just feeling they are harassed) , is that its really different pieces.Posted in: Articles
As a private person you have no impact on public that even remotely justifies that anyone attacks you directly.
However, as a public person, like a politician or as we have here, a cosplayer that actively presents their body in public on public events to players, its in your right to criticizes exactly that, which is the body, its presented in a sexualized manner, so commenting in that way is not even inappropriate (might not be your personal taste, but thats a different deal).
If a private person gets mails from random persons theres zero reason or justification, so thats an entirely different matter compared to someone that publicly pushes themselves into public opinion.
Its a really important part of projecting this matter to the context its presented in.
If i see a women feeding a baby and i tell her "You are a 6/10, i wouldnt even rape you" , it would be an unbelieavable inappropriate thing to say , but to someone that in public makes money by presenting their body ? If i tell that to a stripper ? Inapprioriate for sure, but still an entirely different deal, as context matters, the environment matters and if you do not want to expose to that, you are not forced, you can simply not do that job.
If you go to the extreme and outlaw any potenially rude comment, you restrict language by a great deal, so much that people cannot express anything without fear somebody will feel hurt or insulted, and if that justifies that your social media gets permanently flagged and you suffer for it, its a way more extreme response than the "rude comment" started out as.
The adult option would be to point the rude comments out and keep it on a apprioriate level of response, you can talk stuff out and discuss it to proof a point without going to war directly , and still keep in mind, that no person is outright evil, for such things.
And yes, the real sick people are the ones that perform the threats, thats just downright cruelty and has no other reason than pleasing a sadistic pleasure, and that is absolutely nothing a society has to, or should accept, but its a completely different animal to a critic from an public figure.
I am on the side to promote that individuals are responsible for what they are doing.
Jeremy didnt incite harassment, he did poorly phrased comments sure, but thats hardly crazy evil, its just rude and if you talk to him about that, yes ofcourse he knows himself its rude, and thats about it, you can stand above it and realize that something thats already enough, realize you gone a bit to far and the moment you are told so, you can better yourself, problem solved ; the sick people that continue to threaten , thats what remains, but thats adults, responsible for their actions, and any adult that isnt insane should have enough intelligence to not even do that to begin with.
Racist comments are a special kind of deal, just as gay-topics etc. etc.
Its highly controversial to many people and especially your work place is a context with special meaning here.
If i make a racial comment in private, thats it, nobody cares. If someone is insulted they can sue me, i get appropriate punishment, and/or we settle the topic before it escalates, thats the potential for discussion and understanding that is much more valuable than taking every little comment and blow it up like its a death threat right away ; its clearly not.
In your context part you clearly see context matters so much.
Context is key for this here.
All the screenshots are mostly out of context and look entirely different if you get the big picture.
Yes people are offended a lot, but its undeniably a thing you have to be able to deal with if you have any kind of public job, or open yourself up to that (and if you cannot deal with it, its simply the wrong job for you, as theirs issues with lots of jobs and you cannot just blame others for that, self-responsility is a thing, its not that others are always to blame for anything you do and anything you do will have an effect on others, if your job is in public, thats a given).
I think america in special a lot of people are highly influenced by what some special individuals say , so they build up some form of responsibility for what they say, simply because of that.
And i think, it again depends on context and what group you talk to.
In the case here the group of people is the magic community, people that watch Jeremys Channel, thats already a very small subsection again and people that enjoy trollish comments, so they are already open to that and have their own problems why they cannot control what they are doing (as no sane person would write a death threat email to anybody, but lots of people do, especially in heated discusions and extreme topics).
But here Jeremy cannot be at fault for what individuals end up doing, the targeted audience are adults, and should totally be able to control themselves.
Your last part.
I also think he could be much less rude in his comments and from his latest comments he acknowledges this, as often you have to be told you are going over the edge, and if its good to think about it (but again, its about critic and staying on a non-extreme course, you want discussion and not open war).
Lots of stuff i can relate to and the topic is simply overblown by extreme margins.
In the end, people said some mean things and others reacted to them ; thats actually all that happened, thats rude at best, but its not downright evil.
This topic would much easier and smoother be solved in a much smaller circle, or in private between these two.
Pulling it to public just makes things worse, by a lot and it doesnt serve anybody, be they right or wrong, in the end, this open warfare just damages the community and people will bunker themselves into even more extreme sides and become even more unable to discuss anything without directly insulting each other.
But one thing is guaranteed, this will be a hot topic for the rest of the week and probably the next one, and at some point, nobody will care anymore and just play Magic again.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe fact that a comment makes someone feel harassed doesnt mean it is harassment.Posted in: Articles
Just because someone feels insulted, its not automatic evil in nature.
Most important, he never told to her directly, you literally have to seek out his channel to see the comments, so you actively have to search yourself to see negative comments about yourself.
The indisputable issue are the sick minded individuals that go over the top and do exactly that, email directly, twitter to her directly etc. They do the harassment, they are 100% guilty for it, and they qualify for it, as they indeed take a sadistic pleasure in doing that, its among the most harmful type of troll.
Then theres a difference between private people and people in public.
As a private person nobody has any public interest in what i do and so comments about my person would be out of context.
The moment what you are doing is part of a community, like cosplay at a grand prix and doing pictures of that etc. You present yourself in public and so comments about exactly that are clearly presented.
That alone is no harassment and its just as important to clearly draw a line between what people truly say and what is casually said, simply put, if you are talking to a group of people for hours, chances are you will say something stupid and someone will feel insulted ; so it has to be viewed in context and not just "oh god, look what he said" , and finger point exactly that and ignore anything else.
And especially for Jeremys channel, its clearly a form of topics and talking that you might easily find offending, others do not, some think hes right about a bunch of stuff, and i believe you can easily see he has a bunch of points.
All the so called harassment can be put down to context that gives it a background, so that is what makes the topic a lot more slippery than just believing its all crystal clear.
The idea of thinking its downright crystal clear and theres only black/white in it, is already short sighted, as you have to see more of the picture to get a real glimpse of the actual truth.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemYea, if people truly think theres just 1 problem at hand, and that others, but ofcourse never themselves are a part of it, thats just ridiculous, as it is the kind of finger pointing that just wants to make someone else responsible for what you think is bad.Posted in: Articles
If someone truly feels harassed, seek the police, file a claim, prevent the harassment, thats what you can do as an adult, theres a little bit of responsibility for your own too.
Its not your job to defend your wife, if you truly want fairness, she can do that on her own and she should be absolutely able and willing to do so (and if she isnt, that is a problem you have to start working on).
Its always a big question mark, if you have to drag your personal issues into public.
That just makes everything worse, much worse, as you are suddenly exposed to people that choose sides and over dramatic defend it, no matter if it effects them at all.
The adult way to solve the issue would simply be if she started out to simply ask to stop exactly what she thinks is bothering her. Any responsible adult will accept that and change behavior if its reasonable, and if they dont, you file a claim against them, so they get judged by a neutral court (or you are proven wrong on your feeling of being harassed, thats also an option and as an adult your have to live with it).
Nov 30, 2017Theres critic and just phrasing opinions and as a form of entertainer and content provider he has a form of talking that a lot of people find offensive, but there is plenty of comedians i find offensive, but that doesnt make them in any way problematic.Posted in: Articles
Comments can easily be in bad taste and thats undeniable the case for Jeremy, but the real core of the issue to discuss is the small amount of truly idiotic people that take it to a true harassment and violent form of threats ; and the question to discuss would be if you as a content provider are truly responsible for what some sick individuals do , given they are adults, these people are the actual problem, and thats not Jeremy.
The same kind of sick individuals exist on the other spectrum too, some of them Social Justice Warriors that somehow feel Jeremy has to be "utterly destroyed" and death threats against him are "totally fine".
Seriously, its the same kind of sick individuals and its the CORE of a true problem which puts every little issue into full on overdrive roadkill.
It serves nobody and its a form of discussion that is very prevalent in the internet.
Its a culture of trolls and social justice warriors that simply cannot keep their actions behind a healthy line that keeps a minimum of civilized discourse alive.
If people get famous they undeniable have to have a tougher hide. The more people you know and the more people respond to you, the more bad comments you will accumulate.
Thats natural, and people will either like what you do or they will not.
Some of the sick people will downright hate you for whatever you do and this leads to the exact problem of people that think they have to act themselves , right now and fight what they think is the evil, everyone thinks they are in the right to do so and so nobody is able to self-reflect and see they are going over the top.
If matters settle down you could easily see Jeremy seeing himself that a bunch of stuff crosses the line , but bad taste comments and actual harassment should be dealt with in court and absolutely not in public for people to just judge and start their little lynch mobs in every corner burning whatever victim they just found.
So there is more than just one problem.
A lot of problems and everyone is part of some problem, if they see it, know it, or still deny it.
Nov 30, 2017Theres plenty of "good" men that started wars and killed people in the name of what they thought to be somehow the right thing.Posted in: Articles
The reality is, there are no "evil" and no "good" men, just opinions and people that push these ideology with violence over the other, who ever wins will be in the right, the other side clearly must have been wrong.
Its not the job of people to start a lynch mob and "destroy" other human beings and its downright pedantic to think that is in any way what "good men" should do.
Any problem has to be discussed and solved on the appropriate level.
Pushing topics in public only serves the trolls and media hype , people calling out for a single entity to be blamed for everything they think is bad.
The reality is, theres not a single bad person and everyone is usually to some degree responsible for what they do or do not do.
People really like to give small problems horrific names so they sound like much bigger problems, that leads only to despair and misery, it has no positive benefit for anybody, just pampers the ideology of people that really think they are the only legit form of judgment call, self-administered justice isnt the way to go and if you ever get in the situation to think someone is the personified evil, you are guaranteed wrong and simply ignore the other standpoint (so you become evil yourself, just to pretend to defend against evil, thats in no way a solution and only leads to a conflict in which everyone can blame anyone to be in the right and suddenly there are no good men left anymore).
Nov 30, 2017A very big issue is that different topics are brought together, while they simply do not fit.Posted in: Articles
Nazi and troll posters are two very different things and should never be put together, just to fuel a cause, thats selling your own arguments cheap and makes them one-dimensional black/white thinking again, which is good for nobody.
Also, there will be critic and negative critic as well, that has to be acceptable.
Nobody is forced to be overly positive about anything.
If you truly dislike something you can say so, and its value to the discussion that this is expressed and not just ignored, or even outlawed as something terrible wrong.
At the same time its very valid to criticize something and not come up with a solution on your own right away. I can critic a cook and not be able to make it better, thats totally fine and it must be legit to do so. The point of critic is that you should never need to justify for it, the receiver can take the critic and see it as an issue, or they dont, thats their cup of tea and its what an adult has to learn to deal with.
But here again, this changes a lot if someone is in private or its brought up in public and presented to a mob of people.
If you just honestly dislike cosplay and say so, thats fair, nobody forces you to like anything.
The "locker-room-talk" is a topic entirely for its own. Its something that is widely accepted and always was. Women to the same about men, they even do it among each other, it might just be more subtle than the direct approach of actually saying it out loud, even if its just in the "locker-room" (or in this case a youtube channel, or a bunch of twitter posts).
Its fine on its own.
What really pushes the topic to become a real issue is how stuff completely gets lost and out of control incited to be way bigger than what it really is (and yes, thats a terrible huge deal with the amount of media and the very real interest of media to promote topics into "highlights" and further push the mob to generate more horrific events to report about, its almost a self proclaiming prophecy, so its very difficult to truly say what amount of discussion is healthy and what is just talking it to bits and pieces, as many if not all topics will be seemingly super hot for the moment and meaningless the next week, as there is no real issue beside the illusion of talk at all).
How would an adult deal with bad talk about them in private ?
You confront the person and actually tell them to stop as its not ok for you.
Solves the issue, unless the person is actively not recognizing your problem.
In public it changes a lot.
Theres either somewhat anonymous people that jump on a topic train and pick sides, which very often leads to extreme reactions, way over the top (any threats via mail or any form of actual harm is absolutely no-go, no matter what the topic is, theres never a reason to choose violence to solve anything.
So if you talk in public, it will have an effect on people and it will polarize the people more and more. Thankfully lots of people can distinguish between a topic that truly effects them and just a rat catcher lynch mob , but some cant, and the poster shouldnt be responsible for these individuals, as almost anything could be seen as an incentive for violence, if the individual has some sick mind, theres an entirely different problem of its own (and yes, you have to ask yourselves why so many "troll" people exist and no matter the topic, they are harmful and actively ignore any productive discussion).
For the topic at hand, the first problem that ignited this into a public *****-fest was that it was brought to public at all.
Solving these kinds of issues should have been a thing between Jeremy and Sprinkle , in private or by her actively telling what bothers her, its just fair to do so, as it solves most issues and avoids outside people to intervene.
If that doesnt work out and somebody is not taking your arguments, you can take it to the police and to court to actively stop what bothers you with something like a protective injunction suit, which again should solve the issue at hand, instead of putting it up for debate to a lynch mob that just wants blood, no matter from who.
Its a very clear picture if a topic is just instantly brought to public, avoiding any legal options (or doing so later, in hopes the public opinion boosts your side).
See, if a topic is discussed in public, it will never be fair.
People pick side right away and defend it for whatever the cost, even if it doesnt effect them personally at all ; which brings the Social Justice Warrior term to fruits.
Yes thats a problem just as trolls.
Its good to have empathy, but its bad to jam ideals and ideology into a topic and mix topics entirely, just to proof a point that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Believe it or not, neither Jeremy nor Sprinkle are somehow "evil incarnate" , they arent and they arent "toxic" to the community.
The kind of topic and how much its media-hyped and exaggerated , thats an entire issue of its own and overshadows the problem they personally had to solve between each other and makes it like a community issue , which it isnt, the community is fine, theres very rare cases and problems to deal with and they shouldnt be ignored, but also not exaggerated into spheres they arent fit for.
And this is, about a game, a hobby, people enjoy playing the game and enjoy being part of a community, if this is taken to a level of social criticism it doesnt serve a purpose for the game it just harms the experience for everyone, as it puts a stigma to the game, that it neither deserves or justifies at all.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.