Yea, playing with these cards in paper that constantly flip is absolutely atrocious waste of time.
To fix that problem you run a "proxy" on top of the cards (or more of them) to flip them instead of the card in sleeves ... but if you have to do that as a better way to play the actual card, its a complete failure to have that for the game ...
If a card flips 1 time, fine, if it keeps flipping around, thats not cool at all ...
Especially as this card could work totally without the DFC flipping, simply have it gain and lose the other ability and vise verse, no flipping and it does its job.
- Registered User
Member for 12 years, 8 months, and 10 days
Last active Thu, Oct, 21 2021 21:50:25
- 2 Followers
- 5,544 Total Posts
- 988 Thanks
Sep 6, 2021TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on [MID] "Mysterious Tome" // "Creepy Chronicle"— Athelars previewPosted in: The Rumor Mill
Sep 6, 2021These "mythics" are really just rares reduced by 1 colorless manacost, thats all that makes them "mythic" ...Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Pathetic designs and terrible "mythics" (as thats exactly the kind of design that forces a card to be relevant, simply by pushing it so hard on every angle, as the base-stats are already over the top).
Beside that, cards just "meh". Its pushed to be relevant in standard, and thats about it ... hate this design.
Sep 5, 2021The 1 colorless seems out of place, could just be all green.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
The effect is "overkill" most of the time, especially with multiples of this.
Will probably never play this card as its boring for me, but some people clearly enjoy it.
Sep 5, 2021Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Kryptnyt »I didn't think WOTC felt that way about furries tbh
Just wait till someone appears at your LGS and "cosplays" at this card ...
That will be a moment to remember , and call the police probably ...
Sep 4, 2021The effect is fine, can even be "better" if you copy a creature thats 0/0 with counters.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
If all you want is the enters the battlefield effect or something along that its also good.
So actually a decent card, its just slightly overcosted for its effect at sorcery speed (-1 on casting and flashback, and you get quite some value, it would especially allow you to double cast it easier, as 6 mana is more reasonable than 8 in that case).
But in EDH/Commander there are a bunch of creatures totally worth copying as they are not much bigger than 1/1 anyway and the effect is good.
Artwork could be a bit more spooky and less goofy, but i certainly want a copy and run it (as i am a sucker for clone effects anyway, at least if they can target anything, not just you control, which is complete failure of a clone in my book).
Sep 3, 2021TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on [MID] "Falkenrath Pit Fighter"— Liga Magic previewPeople seem to over-read that its ANY vampire, not just this one itself.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
So its pretty busted for the late-game if you have a lot of vampire tokens to fuel the card draw.
The entire "discard" part to draw into more cards would fit the old vampires with lots of madness more, but thats pretty much the point of the card, to make some wacky combo with all the cheap vampires.
Being a 2/1 for R is just ensuring that this sees play, if the ability is anywhere relevant.
Sep 3, 2021TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on [MID} Gisa, Glorious Resurrector (Wizards spoiler)Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Kryptnyt »I do think it's weird that they make these powerful effects and staple them to a huge body, people would still play this if it was a 2/3
Its WotC logic ... you have to make good cards appeal to all players, and a 4 mana 4/4 is what people expect to get. 3 Thoughness just means it dies to all red removal in relevant formats, so it has to have 4.
And a 3/4 for 4 , well thats just unpleasing for the eye.
Powercreep in the latest two sets goes down tremendously, as just 4 sets ago, this would have deathtouch, lifelink and give all zombies +1/+1 ... now we get this (and its still a pretty bad card for competitive formats, as all it does is turn a casual jimmies deck against themselves, if your opponent does not play creatures, well, it does nothing, while obvisiously in any format where the opponent is playing creatures out of necessity, this can just dominate a game very quickly and produces insanely stupid games in limited if you dont have removal, you can really attack or block anymore).
Sep 3, 2021TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on [MID] Flame Channeler // Embodiment of Flame— GIGA.de previewSmells kinda "broken" with Grapeshot.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
You storm for damage, then you storm for rituals to make more mana and more cards.
Birgi, God of Storytelling works pretty well with that too, either side to fuel the Grapeshot storm.
Runaway Steam-Kin might work as well.
Might be a thing to brew a burn deck with that stuff.
Question is just to reduce the land count to an extreme, so all you draw is fuel.
Sep 2, 2021I really dont understand why they make set boosters at all.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
People either buy them because the value is better or they dont.
If people just draft with cards, having a bunch of them not appear at all in the same set is just AWFUL.
Their "reasoning" is clear as they make cards that dont fit the set to draft, but still, having cards that you cannot get in a booster pack of that set is just deeply terrible.
Not like i would buy any of these anyway ... theres literally no point in not buying singles at this point, as the number of products make it simply impossible to get all the cards on your own anyway ...
Long gone are the days where you could draft 1 time a week and get almost all cards of the set from drafting and price packs ...
Sep 2, 2021The cool thing about the Memorial is the gimmick to build a deck with truly only legendary permanents, lands included (planeswalkers are indestructible, but thats hardly useful for them).Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Not good at all, but you can make it happen as a gimmick.
Should absolutely be cheaper for that reason, just triple white, would suffice, at 3 mana it would do something early enough to matter ... the real issue is the amount of exile removal that just gets around it anyway.
The "visions" look overall quite bad, but if you can use it reliable with flashback (Commander at 5+ mana should do the trick), maybe some fringe use of some of them.
Sep 2, 2021Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Mergatroid_Jones »NOOOOOO! Another mechanic where it doesn't say what the cards do on the cards???? No more of that crap!
Monarch was bad, the dungeon was worse. This is more like monarch, but still just rats. I've designed day/night mechanics on custom cards, and I think I did a better job. At least the cards said what they did.
Just print what the card does on the card.
They should just make all cards textless and have people use their smartphones to "scan" the card and see what the current text and oracle is ;P
... oh no ... i hope i havent given them any ideas ... oh no ...
Sep 2, 2021Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from DJK3654 »
I think WotC very likely avoided it being on a timer because they thought it would be less fun and more boring. No interaction or build around to a timer, and transformations would become literally routine. No suspense or tension if it always happens at the same time. And while these triggers could leave you in day or night for a few turns in a row, they're also ones that are likely to go back and forth a couple times.
I am aware, but it still bites the flavor of the actual idea of having a day/night cycle on the original werewolves it was much more a individual thing to turn, and not connected to an actual day/night cycle.
Here they try to emulate that its a day/night thing, but its not a mechanic about time (like Suspend / Vanishing and the like would be).
Overall the mechanic does its job in gameplay, but it kinda fails to work within its flavor, especially as it has the "old" version that works different, which is just plain annoying if you run a deck with old and new versions of werewolves.
Sep 2, 2021Flavorwise its weird that the day/night cycle is not a cycle on a time-interval , so it can just stay day or night for prolonged time, and people can just decide to make it day/night if they want to ... thats quite a failure.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Gameplay wise, i absolutely hated cards that flipped back and forth, as its just plain annoying in paper ... but playing 2 spells is at least not so trivial in sealed formats.
Aug 28, 2021Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Evil Never Dies »
Of course it was weak, it was after That Which Was Taken stealed from him.
Also, when people will ever, ever learn that any character in Magic, no matter how powerful, never is shown his full power on any card, but simply a particular aspect of him in that moment? That's why we have so many different versions of a Jace, Chandra, Liliana etc.
Emrakul, the Aeons Torn (Eldrazi titans in general) is the kind of powerlevel you expect a world-ending death-machine monster to have.
Annihilate as a mechanic is pretty great to enforce that destructive power, as everytime these monsters make a move, the table is shaking up (or the game ends in just 1 attack).
Final Judgment was a show of force what O-Kagachi, Vengeful Kami could have been, a massively more powerful effect to express a world-destroying power.
In flavor an entire army was not even close to a match to face the big-bad-daddy Kami, it was just exiled all together.
And something that powerful should not be a tiny 6/6.
The power/thoughness issue of modern Magic is a thing that hurts flavor of a card.
If something gigantic is not reflected with a properly giant power/thoughness it is a stane on the card.
If a super powerful being does not have a reflected effect that is that powerful, its another stane.
If too much of a card does not reflect the character, you end up with a mockery of the character, and thats a insult to fans of that character.
It comes down to designing a card for a flavor and theme. These super destructive mega monsters need something that expresses exactly that theme on the card.
The "essence" of a character should be expressed in a card as good as possible.
Instead WotC designed some cards and slapped the names on them , doing the reverse and dishonoring the entire flavor and theme of said characters, thats a way to please nobody and disappoint everyone.
Simply put, just because you CAN do it, if its not done properly and in respect of the character, lore and flavor, you might not have to do it, if you properly respect your franchise (which WotC sincerely does not do anymore at all, they did like 20 years ago).
Cards that show yawgmoth power tend to be super broken Magic cards, at least the ones that people remember, as they forget about all the cards that see no play anyway.
If people dont get something along that powerlevel they will be disappointed. And if you cannot release a card with that powerlevel, well, simply dont do the card or character, as you set yourself up for failure from the get go.
Yawgmoth, Thran Physician is quite a disappointment for a bunch of fans, but it still does something unique and powerful so others love the card regardless.
Even the omnipotent JudeoChristian God could have many magic cards associated with him, all of them depicting him doing different particular actions, because obviously not a single card could cover them all. Same with every single MTG character in existence.
We basically got that in the beginning of Magic , in cards like :
Wrath of God
A god-like destructive power is quite nicely expressed in these mass-removal cards, as thats the power you expect them to have, and not a physical body to kill.
If a god has a "avatar" as a body, its not the character itself, just a tiny bit of its power in a physical body (but in that case its important to actually reference to that as a avatar, instead of the actual name).
Aug 27, 2021Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from Tiro of Meletis »Night's Reach is alive. Bolas had defeated her and stripped away most of her dark power, and stolen her genuine porcelain mask (her "divinity counter") but she had fled again. I imagine the Sisters can restore her, and probably have. But all I can be sure about is that she survived.
If you didnt die on camera for everyone to see, you are not dead.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe deal with being in public and somewhat called "harassment" (and i clearly distinquish between a from a court defined harassment and a person just feeling they are harassed) , is that its really different pieces.Posted in: Articles
As a private person you have no impact on public that even remotely justifies that anyone attacks you directly.
However, as a public person, like a politician or as we have here, a cosplayer that actively presents their body in public on public events to players, its in your right to criticizes exactly that, which is the body, its presented in a sexualized manner, so commenting in that way is not even inappropriate (might not be your personal taste, but thats a different deal).
If a private person gets mails from random persons theres zero reason or justification, so thats an entirely different matter compared to someone that publicly pushes themselves into public opinion.
Its a really important part of projecting this matter to the context its presented in.
If i see a women feeding a baby and i tell her "You are a 6/10, i wouldnt even rape you" , it would be an unbelieavable inappropriate thing to say , but to someone that in public makes money by presenting their body ? If i tell that to a stripper ? Inapprioriate for sure, but still an entirely different deal, as context matters, the environment matters and if you do not want to expose to that, you are not forced, you can simply not do that job.
If you go to the extreme and outlaw any potenially rude comment, you restrict language by a great deal, so much that people cannot express anything without fear somebody will feel hurt or insulted, and if that justifies that your social media gets permanently flagged and you suffer for it, its a way more extreme response than the "rude comment" started out as.
The adult option would be to point the rude comments out and keep it on a apprioriate level of response, you can talk stuff out and discuss it to proof a point without going to war directly , and still keep in mind, that no person is outright evil, for such things.
And yes, the real sick people are the ones that perform the threats, thats just downright cruelty and has no other reason than pleasing a sadistic pleasure, and that is absolutely nothing a society has to, or should accept, but its a completely different animal to a critic from an public figure.
I am on the side to promote that individuals are responsible for what they are doing.
Jeremy didnt incite harassment, he did poorly phrased comments sure, but thats hardly crazy evil, its just rude and if you talk to him about that, yes ofcourse he knows himself its rude, and thats about it, you can stand above it and realize that something thats already enough, realize you gone a bit to far and the moment you are told so, you can better yourself, problem solved ; the sick people that continue to threaten , thats what remains, but thats adults, responsible for their actions, and any adult that isnt insane should have enough intelligence to not even do that to begin with.
Racist comments are a special kind of deal, just as gay-topics etc. etc.
Its highly controversial to many people and especially your work place is a context with special meaning here.
If i make a racial comment in private, thats it, nobody cares. If someone is insulted they can sue me, i get appropriate punishment, and/or we settle the topic before it escalates, thats the potential for discussion and understanding that is much more valuable than taking every little comment and blow it up like its a death threat right away ; its clearly not.
In your context part you clearly see context matters so much.
Context is key for this here.
All the screenshots are mostly out of context and look entirely different if you get the big picture.
Yes people are offended a lot, but its undeniably a thing you have to be able to deal with if you have any kind of public job, or open yourself up to that (and if you cannot deal with it, its simply the wrong job for you, as theirs issues with lots of jobs and you cannot just blame others for that, self-responsility is a thing, its not that others are always to blame for anything you do and anything you do will have an effect on others, if your job is in public, thats a given).
I think america in special a lot of people are highly influenced by what some special individuals say , so they build up some form of responsibility for what they say, simply because of that.
And i think, it again depends on context and what group you talk to.
In the case here the group of people is the magic community, people that watch Jeremys Channel, thats already a very small subsection again and people that enjoy trollish comments, so they are already open to that and have their own problems why they cannot control what they are doing (as no sane person would write a death threat email to anybody, but lots of people do, especially in heated discusions and extreme topics).
But here Jeremy cannot be at fault for what individuals end up doing, the targeted audience are adults, and should totally be able to control themselves.
Your last part.
I also think he could be much less rude in his comments and from his latest comments he acknowledges this, as often you have to be told you are going over the edge, and if its good to think about it (but again, its about critic and staying on a non-extreme course, you want discussion and not open war).
Lots of stuff i can relate to and the topic is simply overblown by extreme margins.
In the end, people said some mean things and others reacted to them ; thats actually all that happened, thats rude at best, but its not downright evil.
This topic would much easier and smoother be solved in a much smaller circle, or in private between these two.
Pulling it to public just makes things worse, by a lot and it doesnt serve anybody, be they right or wrong, in the end, this open warfare just damages the community and people will bunker themselves into even more extreme sides and become even more unable to discuss anything without directly insulting each other.
But one thing is guaranteed, this will be a hot topic for the rest of the week and probably the next one, and at some point, nobody will care anymore and just play Magic again.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe fact that a comment makes someone feel harassed doesnt mean it is harassment.Posted in: Articles
Just because someone feels insulted, its not automatic evil in nature.
Most important, he never told to her directly, you literally have to seek out his channel to see the comments, so you actively have to search yourself to see negative comments about yourself.
The indisputable issue are the sick minded individuals that go over the top and do exactly that, email directly, twitter to her directly etc. They do the harassment, they are 100% guilty for it, and they qualify for it, as they indeed take a sadistic pleasure in doing that, its among the most harmful type of troll.
Then theres a difference between private people and people in public.
As a private person nobody has any public interest in what i do and so comments about my person would be out of context.
The moment what you are doing is part of a community, like cosplay at a grand prix and doing pictures of that etc. You present yourself in public and so comments about exactly that are clearly presented.
That alone is no harassment and its just as important to clearly draw a line between what people truly say and what is casually said, simply put, if you are talking to a group of people for hours, chances are you will say something stupid and someone will feel insulted ; so it has to be viewed in context and not just "oh god, look what he said" , and finger point exactly that and ignore anything else.
And especially for Jeremys channel, its clearly a form of topics and talking that you might easily find offending, others do not, some think hes right about a bunch of stuff, and i believe you can easily see he has a bunch of points.
All the so called harassment can be put down to context that gives it a background, so that is what makes the topic a lot more slippery than just believing its all crystal clear.
The idea of thinking its downright crystal clear and theres only black/white in it, is already short sighted, as you have to see more of the picture to get a real glimpse of the actual truth.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemYea, if people truly think theres just 1 problem at hand, and that others, but ofcourse never themselves are a part of it, thats just ridiculous, as it is the kind of finger pointing that just wants to make someone else responsible for what you think is bad.Posted in: Articles
If someone truly feels harassed, seek the police, file a claim, prevent the harassment, thats what you can do as an adult, theres a little bit of responsibility for your own too.
Its not your job to defend your wife, if you truly want fairness, she can do that on her own and she should be absolutely able and willing to do so (and if she isnt, that is a problem you have to start working on).
Its always a big question mark, if you have to drag your personal issues into public.
That just makes everything worse, much worse, as you are suddenly exposed to people that choose sides and over dramatic defend it, no matter if it effects them at all.
The adult way to solve the issue would simply be if she started out to simply ask to stop exactly what she thinks is bothering her. Any responsible adult will accept that and change behavior if its reasonable, and if they dont, you file a claim against them, so they get judged by a neutral court (or you are proven wrong on your feeling of being harassed, thats also an option and as an adult your have to live with it).
Nov 30, 2017Theres critic and just phrasing opinions and as a form of entertainer and content provider he has a form of talking that a lot of people find offensive, but there is plenty of comedians i find offensive, but that doesnt make them in any way problematic.Posted in: Articles
Comments can easily be in bad taste and thats undeniable the case for Jeremy, but the real core of the issue to discuss is the small amount of truly idiotic people that take it to a true harassment and violent form of threats ; and the question to discuss would be if you as a content provider are truly responsible for what some sick individuals do , given they are adults, these people are the actual problem, and thats not Jeremy.
The same kind of sick individuals exist on the other spectrum too, some of them Social Justice Warriors that somehow feel Jeremy has to be "utterly destroyed" and death threats against him are "totally fine".
Seriously, its the same kind of sick individuals and its the CORE of a true problem which puts every little issue into full on overdrive roadkill.
It serves nobody and its a form of discussion that is very prevalent in the internet.
Its a culture of trolls and social justice warriors that simply cannot keep their actions behind a healthy line that keeps a minimum of civilized discourse alive.
If people get famous they undeniable have to have a tougher hide. The more people you know and the more people respond to you, the more bad comments you will accumulate.
Thats natural, and people will either like what you do or they will not.
Some of the sick people will downright hate you for whatever you do and this leads to the exact problem of people that think they have to act themselves , right now and fight what they think is the evil, everyone thinks they are in the right to do so and so nobody is able to self-reflect and see they are going over the top.
If matters settle down you could easily see Jeremy seeing himself that a bunch of stuff crosses the line , but bad taste comments and actual harassment should be dealt with in court and absolutely not in public for people to just judge and start their little lynch mobs in every corner burning whatever victim they just found.
So there is more than just one problem.
A lot of problems and everyone is part of some problem, if they see it, know it, or still deny it.
Nov 30, 2017Theres plenty of "good" men that started wars and killed people in the name of what they thought to be somehow the right thing.Posted in: Articles
The reality is, there are no "evil" and no "good" men, just opinions and people that push these ideology with violence over the other, who ever wins will be in the right, the other side clearly must have been wrong.
Its not the job of people to start a lynch mob and "destroy" other human beings and its downright pedantic to think that is in any way what "good men" should do.
Any problem has to be discussed and solved on the appropriate level.
Pushing topics in public only serves the trolls and media hype , people calling out for a single entity to be blamed for everything they think is bad.
The reality is, theres not a single bad person and everyone is usually to some degree responsible for what they do or do not do.
People really like to give small problems horrific names so they sound like much bigger problems, that leads only to despair and misery, it has no positive benefit for anybody, just pampers the ideology of people that really think they are the only legit form of judgment call, self-administered justice isnt the way to go and if you ever get in the situation to think someone is the personified evil, you are guaranteed wrong and simply ignore the other standpoint (so you become evil yourself, just to pretend to defend against evil, thats in no way a solution and only leads to a conflict in which everyone can blame anyone to be in the right and suddenly there are no good men left anymore).
Nov 30, 2017A very big issue is that different topics are brought together, while they simply do not fit.Posted in: Articles
Nazi and troll posters are two very different things and should never be put together, just to fuel a cause, thats selling your own arguments cheap and makes them one-dimensional black/white thinking again, which is good for nobody.
Also, there will be critic and negative critic as well, that has to be acceptable.
Nobody is forced to be overly positive about anything.
If you truly dislike something you can say so, and its value to the discussion that this is expressed and not just ignored, or even outlawed as something terrible wrong.
At the same time its very valid to criticize something and not come up with a solution on your own right away. I can critic a cook and not be able to make it better, thats totally fine and it must be legit to do so. The point of critic is that you should never need to justify for it, the receiver can take the critic and see it as an issue, or they dont, thats their cup of tea and its what an adult has to learn to deal with.
But here again, this changes a lot if someone is in private or its brought up in public and presented to a mob of people.
If you just honestly dislike cosplay and say so, thats fair, nobody forces you to like anything.
The "locker-room-talk" is a topic entirely for its own. Its something that is widely accepted and always was. Women to the same about men, they even do it among each other, it might just be more subtle than the direct approach of actually saying it out loud, even if its just in the "locker-room" (or in this case a youtube channel, or a bunch of twitter posts).
Its fine on its own.
What really pushes the topic to become a real issue is how stuff completely gets lost and out of control incited to be way bigger than what it really is (and yes, thats a terrible huge deal with the amount of media and the very real interest of media to promote topics into "highlights" and further push the mob to generate more horrific events to report about, its almost a self proclaiming prophecy, so its very difficult to truly say what amount of discussion is healthy and what is just talking it to bits and pieces, as many if not all topics will be seemingly super hot for the moment and meaningless the next week, as there is no real issue beside the illusion of talk at all).
How would an adult deal with bad talk about them in private ?
You confront the person and actually tell them to stop as its not ok for you.
Solves the issue, unless the person is actively not recognizing your problem.
In public it changes a lot.
Theres either somewhat anonymous people that jump on a topic train and pick sides, which very often leads to extreme reactions, way over the top (any threats via mail or any form of actual harm is absolutely no-go, no matter what the topic is, theres never a reason to choose violence to solve anything.
So if you talk in public, it will have an effect on people and it will polarize the people more and more. Thankfully lots of people can distinguish between a topic that truly effects them and just a rat catcher lynch mob , but some cant, and the poster shouldnt be responsible for these individuals, as almost anything could be seen as an incentive for violence, if the individual has some sick mind, theres an entirely different problem of its own (and yes, you have to ask yourselves why so many "troll" people exist and no matter the topic, they are harmful and actively ignore any productive discussion).
For the topic at hand, the first problem that ignited this into a public *****-fest was that it was brought to public at all.
Solving these kinds of issues should have been a thing between Jeremy and Sprinkle , in private or by her actively telling what bothers her, its just fair to do so, as it solves most issues and avoids outside people to intervene.
If that doesnt work out and somebody is not taking your arguments, you can take it to the police and to court to actively stop what bothers you with something like a protective injunction suit, which again should solve the issue at hand, instead of putting it up for debate to a lynch mob that just wants blood, no matter from who.
Its a very clear picture if a topic is just instantly brought to public, avoiding any legal options (or doing so later, in hopes the public opinion boosts your side).
See, if a topic is discussed in public, it will never be fair.
People pick side right away and defend it for whatever the cost, even if it doesnt effect them personally at all ; which brings the Social Justice Warrior term to fruits.
Yes thats a problem just as trolls.
Its good to have empathy, but its bad to jam ideals and ideology into a topic and mix topics entirely, just to proof a point that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Believe it or not, neither Jeremy nor Sprinkle are somehow "evil incarnate" , they arent and they arent "toxic" to the community.
The kind of topic and how much its media-hyped and exaggerated , thats an entire issue of its own and overshadows the problem they personally had to solve between each other and makes it like a community issue , which it isnt, the community is fine, theres very rare cases and problems to deal with and they shouldnt be ignored, but also not exaggerated into spheres they arent fit for.
And this is, about a game, a hobby, people enjoy playing the game and enjoy being part of a community, if this is taken to a level of social criticism it doesnt serve a purpose for the game it just harms the experience for everyone, as it puts a stigma to the game, that it neither deserves or justifies at all.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.