This might be your best bet and most collected information available:
Exact numbers are not public , but you can make some educated estimated guesses based on some numbers, and their financial reports on how much money they made with the game (which roughly translates to number of cards sold, which they had to produce etc.).
For some special products and factories insider information of the quantity of the order got public by Rudy and some other sources, which spilled some light on how many cards they printed in that particular factory, for at least a print run for one wave.
Most sets get more than 1 wave of print runs, so thats also not an exact science, just estimated guesses.
For the vast majority of sets however the number of copies is so high that it just doesnt matter anymore anyway, there are simply too many of them (millions+).
The quantity of cards is also not random, as they print entire sheets of them anyway, so the numbers are always the same, there isnt just randomly much more of one rare than another (outside of very special exceptions of cards).
- Registered User
Member for 9 years, 11 months, and 6 days
Last active Thu, Jan, 17 2019 14:39:46
- 1 Follower
- 4,546 Total Posts
- 571 Thanks
Jan 16, 2019TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on Economists, mathmeticians, statisticians, and MTG experts: Help Me Out!Posted in: Magic General
Jan 16, 2019Posted in: Magic GeneralQuote from Lithl »What do you think the people buying from the people you know are planning to do with them?
We are not in the kindergarten , we are all aware that someone buys them and cannot or does not want to resell them.
However, for this particular product ALL the people i know of are reselling, ALL of them, not just 1 or 2, ALL of them.
So thats a particularly high number (100%) , compared to any other product that people totally just open and play with.
But still, have not seen anyone actually play with these cards, so chances are, someone buys them and just stores them in a basement, or god knows what people do with the cards outside of public.
Some buy the cards and try to resell them locally, and some might simply fail to find another person in the "snowball" scheme to make more money off, at the end someone has to pay the bill all the others are feeding off.
Still have to see someone actually play with these cards, anybody else just trying to get rid of them and make some profit, and if so many are trying to do that, its either not healthy, or some people just spill out money like a fountain and dont care at all.
Jan 16, 2019The new little Pteramander seems to be a pretty great option to win games if you can greatly reduce its cost to grow.Posted in: Magic General
5/5 flyers end the games fairly quickly and you can always sneak it in for just a single blue mana and counter anything else.
Adapt works also great with counterspells, as you can do it at the end of their turn if they do nothing else.
Jan 16, 2019TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on MTG Streamer Event - RNA Early Access Streams: 1/16-1/17Now we get an "early access" for Streamers of the "Pre"-Release instead of waiting for the actual physical Release.Posted in: Magic General
Its a shift in the digital direction and this will further make PreRelease events less attractive to a whole bunch of people.
The people that want the social event will still attend the PreRelease , but its a pretty sad experience in this combination.
This might set a pretty terrible precedence that will cause them to push digital over physical more and more (for no real reason other than "because we can").
Jan 15, 2019Posted in: Magic GeneralQuote from JaceBluesMaster »
People who want the cards to bling out their decks...? Collectors...? People who like the characters...?
There are a lot of people who would want one or more of these cards.
Obviously, as i said, all the people i know just buy these to sell them again, i have literally not seen a single person so far that actually plays with them or wants to keep them.
Jan 13, 2019TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on Is it just me, or are there almost no constructed playable Common cards in RNA?Almost all the commons are just WORSE versions of already existing cards.Posted in: New Card Discussion
So the only way to make them reasonable is if you want more copies and you are cool with the worse one too.
Jan 13, 2019EU vs US cards feel different, US cards feel a lot worse in my view, almost like fake cards if you dont know the difference.Posted in: Card Authentication
In the EU the US cards are sold in the fat packs and every time someone new buys them they think they are fake cards.
Slight color variations can be normal, there are sometimes missprints.
The cards are printed in "layers" of colors and especially for the font it can get blurry if its not done right.
The vast majority of FAKE cards have a terrible backside that is more orange than brown and usually the easiest to see its a fake card.
For cards that are cheap like under 1$ , probably nobody would care if its a Fake card anyway.
Jan 11, 2019TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on RNA Prerelease: which guild are you picking and whyAny green base guild seems to be a good choice, just to get the juice options to much easier splash bombs of any color.Posted in: Magic General
You get 6 guild gates , that hopefully are usefull to you to splash stuff.
The more bombs and removal you can play the better.
Green can tutor guild gates and has the 1 mana creature that produces any color of mana.
There are not too much cards with crazy manacosts, outside of the obnoxious cycle of uncommons and some rares.
Gruul and Simic seem to be reasonable save picks, as you can fairly easily splash white and splash black with just some or even a single guild gate of that color combination.
Orzhov, Azorius and Rakdos might only have the edge if you are truly lucky to simply get fitting bombs.
But regardless of that, having a easier time and a more sophisticated manabase is always a better starting point.
Overall Gruul seems to be the choice with the biggest bang and being green you get some fixing to play whatever bomb you open in other colors.
Jan 11, 2019Posted in: The Rumor MillQuote from thatmarkguy »
I don’t see where this paranoia about ‘pair against anyone’ is coming from. I don’t see anything in this release that suggests any different from the usual event-runner-assigned pairings.
Its how they do it in the store "league" , where people have a tracking list and simply write the result in.
You can play people whenever you want and it ends up with lots of fake results anyway.
Jan 11, 2019The ability to swap with planeswalkers is quite a big deal.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Sadly most of the crazy good planeswalkers in current standard can actually destroy or remove this enchantment, kinda shocking to realize that.
But just having this ensures you dont die against a single big target and getting this back with bounce spells isnt that bad either (its just slow and the format will have Mortify and countless enchantment removal, which is kinda sad).
Jan 11, 2019Arena limited is just picking cards and throwing it against the next opponent.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
Its just bad.
But it is totally fine for the casual people that dont care if they win at all, they simply get to play more, profit for them.
Best of 3 is important to mitigate some luck, as you can totally have a really bad draw and flood/screw on mana, you might lose a game simply for that, but thats not the end of the game.
For something like a PreRelease the Best of 1 can be totally fine, as the vast majority just wants to play with the new cards anyway, and prices can be spread to a wider range of players, so its not really competitive at all.
For FNM drafts its not that cut and dry, as you want to have some form of competitive nature to it as an entry level event for the competitive magic.
The sad part is that current sets are even DESIGNED to be viable for Best-Of-1 matches, as the cards that would been actual sideboard cards are more and more removed or have flexible modes that allow them to hit more stuff / or get cycling and the like added to not be dead.
Thats fine to some degree, but in the end, it dumbs the game down , which some people are totally fine with, others are not.
If you dont get paired with people and you simply seek out an opponent that is available in a store , it will be bad too, as it further increases the "anti-social" part, as some players will not be as "liked" as others and if nobody or just less players want to play them, its not really a good social gathering anymore ; thats problematic in my view.
Some might seek out the "easy" opponents just to get more wins, which is also problematic.
Pairings are fair and neutral and you get to play against different opponents.
If you get to choose who you want to play, thats just not going to end well.
Jan 11, 2019Not even remotely worth its asking price of 250$.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
And the artwork is ugly as sin , its like they rushed this out quickly, simply to have something to sell.
To be fair, Tamiyo looks great, at least 1.
Wonder who will buy this iteration , its a total failure already ...
They will push these out every set as long as they can make easy money with them ...
Jan 10, 2019Cool effect, but it will rarely to never go off in a way that really benefits the player that casts it in constructed.Posted in: The Rumor Mill
In limited this does at least something (they will discard the hand first, then give you tokens and/or go to 4 life, so its not really doing anything really great, unless they have absolutely nothing and its a board stall).
Could have been a way cooler card, as the mechanic is sweet, but i dont really see that this does much, unless the opponent has nothing anyway.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe deal with being in public and somewhat called "harassment" (and i clearly distinquish between a from a court defined harassment and a person just feeling they are harassed) , is that its really different pieces.Posted in: Articles
As a private person you have no impact on public that even remotely justifies that anyone attacks you directly.
However, as a public person, like a politician or as we have here, a cosplayer that actively presents their body in public on public events to players, its in your right to criticizes exactly that, which is the body, its presented in a sexualized manner, so commenting in that way is not even inappropriate (might not be your personal taste, but thats a different deal).
If a private person gets mails from random persons theres zero reason or justification, so thats an entirely different matter compared to someone that publicly pushes themselves into public opinion.
Its a really important part of projecting this matter to the context its presented in.
If i see a women feeding a baby and i tell her "You are a 6/10, i wouldnt even rape you" , it would be an unbelieavable inappropriate thing to say , but to someone that in public makes money by presenting their body ? If i tell that to a stripper ? Inapprioriate for sure, but still an entirely different deal, as context matters, the environment matters and if you do not want to expose to that, you are not forced, you can simply not do that job.
If you go to the extreme and outlaw any potenially rude comment, you restrict language by a great deal, so much that people cannot express anything without fear somebody will feel hurt or insulted, and if that justifies that your social media gets permanently flagged and you suffer for it, its a way more extreme response than the "rude comment" started out as.
The adult option would be to point the rude comments out and keep it on a apprioriate level of response, you can talk stuff out and discuss it to proof a point without going to war directly , and still keep in mind, that no person is outright evil, for such things.
And yes, the real sick people are the ones that perform the threats, thats just downright cruelty and has no other reason than pleasing a sadistic pleasure, and that is absolutely nothing a society has to, or should accept, but its a completely different animal to a critic from an public figure.
I am on the side to promote that individuals are responsible for what they are doing.
Jeremy didnt incite harassment, he did poorly phrased comments sure, but thats hardly crazy evil, its just rude and if you talk to him about that, yes ofcourse he knows himself its rude, and thats about it, you can stand above it and realize that something thats already enough, realize you gone a bit to far and the moment you are told so, you can better yourself, problem solved ; the sick people that continue to threaten , thats what remains, but thats adults, responsible for their actions, and any adult that isnt insane should have enough intelligence to not even do that to begin with.
Racist comments are a special kind of deal, just as gay-topics etc. etc.
Its highly controversial to many people and especially your work place is a context with special meaning here.
If i make a racial comment in private, thats it, nobody cares. If someone is insulted they can sue me, i get appropriate punishment, and/or we settle the topic before it escalates, thats the potential for discussion and understanding that is much more valuable than taking every little comment and blow it up like its a death threat right away ; its clearly not.
In your context part you clearly see context matters so much.
Context is key for this here.
All the screenshots are mostly out of context and look entirely different if you get the big picture.
Yes people are offended a lot, but its undeniably a thing you have to be able to deal with if you have any kind of public job, or open yourself up to that (and if you cannot deal with it, its simply the wrong job for you, as theirs issues with lots of jobs and you cannot just blame others for that, self-responsility is a thing, its not that others are always to blame for anything you do and anything you do will have an effect on others, if your job is in public, thats a given).
I think america in special a lot of people are highly influenced by what some special individuals say , so they build up some form of responsibility for what they say, simply because of that.
And i think, it again depends on context and what group you talk to.
In the case here the group of people is the magic community, people that watch Jeremys Channel, thats already a very small subsection again and people that enjoy trollish comments, so they are already open to that and have their own problems why they cannot control what they are doing (as no sane person would write a death threat email to anybody, but lots of people do, especially in heated discusions and extreme topics).
But here Jeremy cannot be at fault for what individuals end up doing, the targeted audience are adults, and should totally be able to control themselves.
Your last part.
I also think he could be much less rude in his comments and from his latest comments he acknowledges this, as often you have to be told you are going over the edge, and if its good to think about it (but again, its about critic and staying on a non-extreme course, you want discussion and not open war).
Lots of stuff i can relate to and the topic is simply overblown by extreme margins.
In the end, people said some mean things and others reacted to them ; thats actually all that happened, thats rude at best, but its not downright evil.
This topic would much easier and smoother be solved in a much smaller circle, or in private between these two.
Pulling it to public just makes things worse, by a lot and it doesnt serve anybody, be they right or wrong, in the end, this open warfare just damages the community and people will bunker themselves into even more extreme sides and become even more unable to discuss anything without directly insulting each other.
But one thing is guaranteed, this will be a hot topic for the rest of the week and probably the next one, and at some point, nobody will care anymore and just play Magic again.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThe fact that a comment makes someone feel harassed doesnt mean it is harassment.Posted in: Articles
Just because someone feels insulted, its not automatic evil in nature.
Most important, he never told to her directly, you literally have to seek out his channel to see the comments, so you actively have to search yourself to see negative comments about yourself.
The indisputable issue are the sick minded individuals that go over the top and do exactly that, email directly, twitter to her directly etc. They do the harassment, they are 100% guilty for it, and they qualify for it, as they indeed take a sadistic pleasure in doing that, its among the most harmful type of troll.
Then theres a difference between private people and people in public.
As a private person nobody has any public interest in what i do and so comments about my person would be out of context.
The moment what you are doing is part of a community, like cosplay at a grand prix and doing pictures of that etc. You present yourself in public and so comments about exactly that are clearly presented.
That alone is no harassment and its just as important to clearly draw a line between what people truly say and what is casually said, simply put, if you are talking to a group of people for hours, chances are you will say something stupid and someone will feel insulted ; so it has to be viewed in context and not just "oh god, look what he said" , and finger point exactly that and ignore anything else.
And especially for Jeremys channel, its clearly a form of topics and talking that you might easily find offending, others do not, some think hes right about a bunch of stuff, and i believe you can easily see he has a bunch of points.
All the so called harassment can be put down to context that gives it a background, so that is what makes the topic a lot more slippery than just believing its all crystal clear.
The idea of thinking its downright crystal clear and theres only black/white in it, is already short sighted, as you have to see more of the picture to get a real glimpse of the actual truth.
Nov 30, 2017TheOnlyOne652089 posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemYea, if people truly think theres just 1 problem at hand, and that others, but ofcourse never themselves are a part of it, thats just ridiculous, as it is the kind of finger pointing that just wants to make someone else responsible for what you think is bad.Posted in: Articles
If someone truly feels harassed, seek the police, file a claim, prevent the harassment, thats what you can do as an adult, theres a little bit of responsibility for your own too.
Its not your job to defend your wife, if you truly want fairness, she can do that on her own and she should be absolutely able and willing to do so (and if she isnt, that is a problem you have to start working on).
Its always a big question mark, if you have to drag your personal issues into public.
That just makes everything worse, much worse, as you are suddenly exposed to people that choose sides and over dramatic defend it, no matter if it effects them at all.
The adult way to solve the issue would simply be if she started out to simply ask to stop exactly what she thinks is bothering her. Any responsible adult will accept that and change behavior if its reasonable, and if they dont, you file a claim against them, so they get judged by a neutral court (or you are proven wrong on your feeling of being harassed, thats also an option and as an adult your have to live with it).
Nov 30, 2017Theres critic and just phrasing opinions and as a form of entertainer and content provider he has a form of talking that a lot of people find offensive, but there is plenty of comedians i find offensive, but that doesnt make them in any way problematic.Posted in: Articles
Comments can easily be in bad taste and thats undeniable the case for Jeremy, but the real core of the issue to discuss is the small amount of truly idiotic people that take it to a true harassment and violent form of threats ; and the question to discuss would be if you as a content provider are truly responsible for what some sick individuals do , given they are adults, these people are the actual problem, and thats not Jeremy.
The same kind of sick individuals exist on the other spectrum too, some of them Social Justice Warriors that somehow feel Jeremy has to be "utterly destroyed" and death threats against him are "totally fine".
Seriously, its the same kind of sick individuals and its the CORE of a true problem which puts every little issue into full on overdrive roadkill.
It serves nobody and its a form of discussion that is very prevalent in the internet.
Its a culture of trolls and social justice warriors that simply cannot keep their actions behind a healthy line that keeps a minimum of civilized discourse alive.
If people get famous they undeniable have to have a tougher hide. The more people you know and the more people respond to you, the more bad comments you will accumulate.
Thats natural, and people will either like what you do or they will not.
Some of the sick people will downright hate you for whatever you do and this leads to the exact problem of people that think they have to act themselves , right now and fight what they think is the evil, everyone thinks they are in the right to do so and so nobody is able to self-reflect and see they are going over the top.
If matters settle down you could easily see Jeremy seeing himself that a bunch of stuff crosses the line , but bad taste comments and actual harassment should be dealt with in court and absolutely not in public for people to just judge and start their little lynch mobs in every corner burning whatever victim they just found.
So there is more than just one problem.
A lot of problems and everyone is part of some problem, if they see it, know it, or still deny it.
Nov 30, 2017Theres plenty of "good" men that started wars and killed people in the name of what they thought to be somehow the right thing.Posted in: Articles
The reality is, there are no "evil" and no "good" men, just opinions and people that push these ideology with violence over the other, who ever wins will be in the right, the other side clearly must have been wrong.
Its not the job of people to start a lynch mob and "destroy" other human beings and its downright pedantic to think that is in any way what "good men" should do.
Any problem has to be discussed and solved on the appropriate level.
Pushing topics in public only serves the trolls and media hype , people calling out for a single entity to be blamed for everything they think is bad.
The reality is, theres not a single bad person and everyone is usually to some degree responsible for what they do or do not do.
People really like to give small problems horrific names so they sound like much bigger problems, that leads only to despair and misery, it has no positive benefit for anybody, just pampers the ideology of people that really think they are the only legit form of judgment call, self-administered justice isnt the way to go and if you ever get in the situation to think someone is the personified evil, you are guaranteed wrong and simply ignore the other standpoint (so you become evil yourself, just to pretend to defend against evil, thats in no way a solution and only leads to a conflict in which everyone can blame anyone to be in the right and suddenly there are no good men left anymore).
Nov 30, 2017A very big issue is that different topics are brought together, while they simply do not fit.Posted in: Articles
Nazi and troll posters are two very different things and should never be put together, just to fuel a cause, thats selling your own arguments cheap and makes them one-dimensional black/white thinking again, which is good for nobody.
Also, there will be critic and negative critic as well, that has to be acceptable.
Nobody is forced to be overly positive about anything.
If you truly dislike something you can say so, and its value to the discussion that this is expressed and not just ignored, or even outlawed as something terrible wrong.
At the same time its very valid to criticize something and not come up with a solution on your own right away. I can critic a cook and not be able to make it better, thats totally fine and it must be legit to do so. The point of critic is that you should never need to justify for it, the receiver can take the critic and see it as an issue, or they dont, thats their cup of tea and its what an adult has to learn to deal with.
But here again, this changes a lot if someone is in private or its brought up in public and presented to a mob of people.
If you just honestly dislike cosplay and say so, thats fair, nobody forces you to like anything.
The "locker-room-talk" is a topic entirely for its own. Its something that is widely accepted and always was. Women to the same about men, they even do it among each other, it might just be more subtle than the direct approach of actually saying it out loud, even if its just in the "locker-room" (or in this case a youtube channel, or a bunch of twitter posts).
Its fine on its own.
What really pushes the topic to become a real issue is how stuff completely gets lost and out of control incited to be way bigger than what it really is (and yes, thats a terrible huge deal with the amount of media and the very real interest of media to promote topics into "highlights" and further push the mob to generate more horrific events to report about, its almost a self proclaiming prophecy, so its very difficult to truly say what amount of discussion is healthy and what is just talking it to bits and pieces, as many if not all topics will be seemingly super hot for the moment and meaningless the next week, as there is no real issue beside the illusion of talk at all).
How would an adult deal with bad talk about them in private ?
You confront the person and actually tell them to stop as its not ok for you.
Solves the issue, unless the person is actively not recognizing your problem.
In public it changes a lot.
Theres either somewhat anonymous people that jump on a topic train and pick sides, which very often leads to extreme reactions, way over the top (any threats via mail or any form of actual harm is absolutely no-go, no matter what the topic is, theres never a reason to choose violence to solve anything.
So if you talk in public, it will have an effect on people and it will polarize the people more and more. Thankfully lots of people can distinguish between a topic that truly effects them and just a rat catcher lynch mob , but some cant, and the poster shouldnt be responsible for these individuals, as almost anything could be seen as an incentive for violence, if the individual has some sick mind, theres an entirely different problem of its own (and yes, you have to ask yourselves why so many "troll" people exist and no matter the topic, they are harmful and actively ignore any productive discussion).
For the topic at hand, the first problem that ignited this into a public *****-fest was that it was brought to public at all.
Solving these kinds of issues should have been a thing between Jeremy and Sprinkle , in private or by her actively telling what bothers her, its just fair to do so, as it solves most issues and avoids outside people to intervene.
If that doesnt work out and somebody is not taking your arguments, you can take it to the police and to court to actively stop what bothers you with something like a protective injunction suit, which again should solve the issue at hand, instead of putting it up for debate to a lynch mob that just wants blood, no matter from who.
Its a very clear picture if a topic is just instantly brought to public, avoiding any legal options (or doing so later, in hopes the public opinion boosts your side).
See, if a topic is discussed in public, it will never be fair.
People pick side right away and defend it for whatever the cost, even if it doesnt effect them personally at all ; which brings the Social Justice Warrior term to fruits.
Yes thats a problem just as trolls.
Its good to have empathy, but its bad to jam ideals and ideology into a topic and mix topics entirely, just to proof a point that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Believe it or not, neither Jeremy nor Sprinkle are somehow "evil incarnate" , they arent and they arent "toxic" to the community.
The kind of topic and how much its media-hyped and exaggerated , thats an entire issue of its own and overshadows the problem they personally had to solve between each other and makes it like a community issue , which it isnt, the community is fine, theres very rare cases and problems to deal with and they shouldnt be ignored, but also not exaggerated into spheres they arent fit for.
And this is, about a game, a hobby, people enjoy playing the game and enjoy being part of a community, if this is taken to a level of social criticism it doesnt serve a purpose for the game it just harms the experience for everyone, as it puts a stigma to the game, that it neither deserves or justifies at all.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.