I'm taking Japanese at my collage now. I'd be glad if we helped each other, however I have neither aim, yim, or a way to chat on live, so can I send you emails instead?
I do like the idea of getting a 2/2 creature... Thank you! The second two seem to be just a twist on unearth, which is not what I was going for. But thank you for your suggestions.
I was thinking about an iconic theme for black. I decided that I liked the idea of zombies, and want to know if you guys think this theme, and particularly these cards, are balanced.
The idea is that for a little more mana the creature will never die, I'm a little bit afraid that it is a little overpowered, but want the creature to always come back...
Zombifiy X (You may play this creature from the graveyard for X. It is a zombie in addition to its other types)
Goblin zombie B C
creature- goblin zombie
zobifiy BB
0/1
Zombie king2BB R
Legendary creature-Zombie Wizard
All cards not on the battlefield are zombies in addition to there other types
All zombies in the graveyard get +1/+1 and zombifiey 2B plus there converted mana cost
2/2
I have no idea on how to word this card, but I want all cards in the graveyard to have zombifiey 2B plus the cmc of the creature
It seems that the rapid share file doesn't work. Could someone re upload it, or maybe upload it to a sight that doesn't have a maximum download number of ten. Thank you.
@AlphaInsidious
These are the things that I noticed happened on the last couple pages, and I was simply stating them. You and I both saw the same things going on, and thus we had very similar posts. Since we both have very limited information, any post stating the different relation's are likely to be similar.
@Bringer, define working together? Does the fact that I'm defending Jobie necessarily mean that i'm "working with him"?
Remember that in this game, the only reason players would be "working together" would be they know the other to be the same alignment and share the same goals....in other words, in this type of game, you'd be accusing us both of being scum.
Right. Either this or one of you believe (very) strongly that the other is town.
Im curious about bringer tho. He's ****ing beetlejuice. You say his name 3 times in a post, and he appears to post! Then he disappears just as quickly on the way out.
Alright, who said my name?
Anyway it seems that Loran and Jobie are working together. I don't think either one is particularly scummy but it does seem that they are working together, or are just using each other to have an excuse to say something bad about Bilbo and Nom. It also seems that Bilbo is trying to twist people into acting against Jobie, Loran, and WoD.
I see two people defending each other, and one acting out against three people. It seems like Bilbo is acting more scummy, but he dosen't seem against town, just against people who seem to be acting townish.
2.a. If he was lying, why would the real kingmaker stay silent?
To get more information from the mafia, as you said you wanted to do. He could claim at any time, and get more information from the mafia from claiming.
They don't fit into categories. Moreover, why would you strategize in such a fashion? Why wouldn't you want to scumhunt instead and use scumhunting to sort out the scum from town?
Absolutely no good reason. It was just an idea I had. I am not saying that people will fit absolutely into any categories, I was saying that these are what we are likely to perceive, upon seeing nothing but there posts.
So, while i love jumping on newbs early in games and getting them modkilled (errr, scratch that. No i don't. Honest.), you are purely approaching this game from a perspective of not actually playing it....which is bizarre for a town player.
Maybe I am thinking of it as a way of thinking of this as if I was not actually playing it. But this was how my thoughts arranged themselves.
We're in the game, this isn't a pregame strategy...and just randomly picking 2 people is not a mafia strategy. It's stupid. FOS BringeroftheNight
I was not proposing that Niv pick up two random people. I was proposing that the town figures out who they see as probably townies and then get Niv to pick those people to be king, getting information from the mafia bassed on how people take on the different people being elected for the person to be king.
I was trying to stay away from saying the Kingmaker is Niv, becuse it could be that he is lying. I am not aware of how people play on this website, and I asume that everyone is going for the move that has the most self interest in theire respective group. Thus I can see that it would be possible for someone in the mafia to claim the kngmaker after seeing Nom Amnor's post.
Now from what I have read on this forum, this seems unlikley, however I would like to keep this possiblility open.
Bringer, could you rephrase this post and explain what you're talking about here? I'm genuinely curious.
I started by thinking that if someone is given the power of a lynch at will, then we will get three types of townie's, and scum. The first type of townie would think about everything, and listen to all options, the second type would lynch someone solely due to a vendetta they have against another player, and the third who will kill who ever he thinks might even possibly be mafia.
The first type would deliberate, and ask everyone to voice their opinion, while he thinks of all possible actions.
The second type would simply lynch someone he doesn't like.
The third type will look at something suspicious and instantly call scum, and lynch him.
I think scum could act like any one of these people, and not care about which one he picks.
I think the first type would be the most predominant amongst the group, while the second would be second most likely, and third the least likely.
Now the kingmaker has the ability to choose which one of these will be up to bat. If the kingmaker chooses wisely, then we will have someone who will listen to all sides, and still act decisively, someone more in category one.
My second thought was that the town could have a strategy where the kingmaker will pick two people to be king. The kingmaker keep switching between these two people, who will decide the fate of the game. Thus if we get two townies, town will eventually end the game. Now if we had one townie and one mafia town has the possibility of wining, while the mafia will get one and a half kills each day, to the town's possible one. The third possibility is that the kingmaker would pick both mafia members, and then town loses.
So we have Niv, who claims to be kingmaker. Then we have DoW, who is currently king. Thus we have DoW who will be the one voting to lynch for the day. If Niv is the kingmaker, and made a correct guess, and didn't pick scum, then we have a townie voting who has the sole choice of who to lynch, and he will have no more information then us, so we would have someone who could quickly vote for anyone, or specifically as someone he believes to be mafia, while if he picked scum, then they will either pick a random person, that is a townie, or will spend a ton of time deliberating. Thus I believe we should pick someone who is not holding a grudge, or someone who is willing to take a vote.
So kingmaker needs to decide on who is willing to take a vote, and who is just going to kill whoever he fells like, either acting out a grudge, or some other detail, or someone who will vote on who he believes the scum are, and of course if we picked a scum over and over again as king, town doesn't stand much of a chance.. The kingmaker needs to carefully switch between the two types of people, avoiding both who the mafia is, and people who will lynch on a whim, so the town can get something productive done.
Card name Error description
___ Deck to small
Avatar - Momir Vig, Simic visionary Invalid quantity
Does anyone know what is going on?
Edit: I'm not sure if this belongs here, if it dosen't please move it.
Zombifiey ( When this creature is put it into the graveyard put a token of this card into play without zombifiey)
That way it could still come back, and would still have the zombie flavor, but wouldn't be an undying card. It just seems kinda bland.
Zombifiy X (You may play this creature from the graveyard for X. It is a zombie in addition to its other types)
Goblin zombie B C
creature- goblin zombie
zobifiy BB
0/1
Zombie king2BB R
Legendary creature-Zombie Wizard
All cards not on the battlefield are zombies in addition to there other types
All zombies in the graveyard get +1/+1 and zombifiey 2B plus there converted mana cost
2/2
I have no idea on how to word this card, but I want all cards in the graveyard to have zombifiey 2B plus the cmc of the creature
These are the things that I noticed happened on the last couple pages, and I was simply stating them. You and I both saw the same things going on, and thus we had very similar posts. Since we both have very limited information, any post stating the different relation's are likely to be similar.
Right. Either this or one of you believe (very) strongly that the other is town.
I'm really busy right now, I'm very sorry I can't respond as often as I would like too, I just got a very unexpected work load.
This is true.
Alright, who said my name?
Anyway it seems that Loran and Jobie are working together. I don't think either one is particularly scummy but it does seem that they are working together, or are just using each other to have an excuse to say something bad about Bilbo and Nom. It also seems that Bilbo is trying to twist people into acting against Jobie, Loran, and WoD.
I see two people defending each other, and one acting out against three people. It seems like Bilbo is acting more scummy, but he dosen't seem against town, just against people who seem to be acting townish.
Online I have not. In a game this large I have not. In real life, in very small games I have.
So that people will not look at him if he was scum.
To get more information from the mafia, as you said you wanted to do. He could claim at any time, and get more information from the mafia from claiming.
Pumpkin
On whoever he felt was acting the most scummy on the first day.
No.
Detroit Red Wings.
I answered all of them seriously. Now I demand to know what you planed to gain from asking me these arbitrary questions.
This is correct.
Absolutely no good reason. It was just an idea I had. I am not saying that people will fit absolutely into any categories, I was saying that these are what we are likely to perceive, upon seeing nothing but there posts.
Maybe I am thinking of it as a way of thinking of this as if I was not actually playing it. But this was how my thoughts arranged themselves.
I was not proposing that Niv pick up two random people. I was proposing that the town figures out who they see as probably townies and then get Niv to pick those people to be king, getting information from the mafia bassed on how people take on the different people being elected for the person to be king.
I was trying to stay away from saying the Kingmaker is Niv, becuse it could be that he is lying. I am not aware of how people play on this website, and I asume that everyone is going for the move that has the most self interest in theire respective group. Thus I can see that it would be possible for someone in the mafia to claim the kngmaker after seeing Nom Amnor's post.
Now from what I have read on this forum, this seems unlikley, however I would like to keep this possiblility open.
I started by thinking that if someone is given the power of a lynch at will, then we will get three types of townie's, and scum. The first type of townie would think about everything, and listen to all options, the second type would lynch someone solely due to a vendetta they have against another player, and the third who will kill who ever he thinks might even possibly be mafia.
The first type would deliberate, and ask everyone to voice their opinion, while he thinks of all possible actions.
The second type would simply lynch someone he doesn't like.
The third type will look at something suspicious and instantly call scum, and lynch him.
I think scum could act like any one of these people, and not care about which one he picks.
I think the first type would be the most predominant amongst the group, while the second would be second most likely, and third the least likely.
Now the kingmaker has the ability to choose which one of these will be up to bat. If the kingmaker chooses wisely, then we will have someone who will listen to all sides, and still act decisively, someone more in category one.
My second thought was that the town could have a strategy where the kingmaker will pick two people to be king. The kingmaker keep switching between these two people, who will decide the fate of the game. Thus if we get two townies, town will eventually end the game. Now if we had one townie and one mafia town has the possibility of wining, while the mafia will get one and a half kills each day, to the town's possible one. The third possibility is that the kingmaker would pick both mafia members, and then town loses.
I hope that this was more clear.
So kingmaker needs to decide on who is willing to take a vote, and who is just going to kill whoever he fells like, either acting out a grudge, or some other detail, or someone who will vote on who he believes the scum are, and of course if we picked a scum over and over again as king, town doesn't stand much of a chance.. The kingmaker needs to carefully switch between the two types of people, avoiding both who the mafia is, and people who will lynch on a whim, so the town can get something productive done.