2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Mox Tantalite Twitch TV stream
    I don't know, every time a Mox got spoiled in the last few years, people were initially saying how bad it is, and it always ended up playable somewhere. Free mana for 0 always ended up good, no matter the restrictions.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 4

    posted a message on Mothership Spoilers 04/04/19
    The bigger versions are so clearly copy/pasted/scaled in a smaller version in each other's cards... Come on.

    Really feels off, both perspective and composition.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Glaive of the Guildpact
    For me a glaive is a Roman short sword. It's the first time ever that I hear that it could also mean a polearm...
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Leaked Announcement - New Masterpieces and Reserved List Update
    This can be fake, but it could be true in theory. I don't think that masterpieces would really hurt the original value, if only for collectable/frame reasons. An unlimited Serra is 40-50$ that has nothing to do with gameplay.

    As for Ravnica 3, masterpiece original dual lands would be very fitting, and this is the #1 thing people are requesting. It's not like they will start printing moxes right away, or ever.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Four mana O-Ring + 4 other uncommons (Lords of Limited podcast)
    Quote from Havrekjex »
    Quote from Diarmuid »
    4-mana O-ring I understand, but it could have been common at that rate.
    I don't think you play limited.


    I actually only play limited... and what I meant is that there is often overcosted removal in white at common for limited purposes, for example pacifism effects & variants at 3-5CC. I think an unconditional removal at 4mana comes late enough to not break anything, and balances out big bombs. Plus if it's common, you can o-ring their o-ring too. Of course, in a set with big dragons, I understand they might want to make removal less common, but I'm not sure how much this will be relevant in limited, there's plenty of ultra-efficient low-cost creatures now, it might end up being like Ixalan where ultra-fast pirate decks (hello cutlass) killed dino players before they could cast anything.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 5

    posted a message on Benalish Honor Guard and Ghitu Journeymage from MTG arena
    Hey, that's clearly a Ghitu Pizzamage, fresh from the oven, they made a mistake in the name.

    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Dominaria Frame, Template, and Rules Changes + Duel Decks: Elves vs. Inventors
    Quote from NGW »
    Singular "They"

    In its desire to always be correct and consistent, Magic's rules templating has always opted for the Chicago Manual of Style's method of referring to a person of unknown gender: "he or she." Or "him or her" or "his or her."

    There are a lot of reasons not to like those phrases. For me, the problems are that they take up a lot of words and that no one actually talks that way. People use the singular "they" all the time conversationally, and as language changes, the rules of proper usage have relaxed enough that we're comfortable switching to it now. Hooray!

    What's not hooray-worthy, unfortunately, is that there aren't any cards in Duel Decks: Elves vs. Inventors that use the new template. But as an example, check out the current and future text for Duress.

    Current:

    Target opponent reveals his or her hand. You choose a noncreature, nonland card from it. That player discards that card.

    Dominaria Oracle update:

    Target opponent reveals their hand. You choose a noncreature, nonland card from it. That player discards that card.

    And if this change, in addition to saving words, makes our card text more inclusive for people that don't identify as either a "he" or a "she," that's super awesome as well.


    *rolls eyes*

    It's obvious the intent wasn't that and people just had to latch onto it and push it as an agenda-filled move when it was always obvious they did it solely because it makes cards less wordy than they needed to be. So of course Wizards now has to pat themselves on the back over including wording that makes helicopters feel involved.


    In any case, the intent SHOULD have been to make the text more inclusive, and then, if it makes it shorter, well that's super awesome as well.

    Presenting something fundamental, such as being respectful and inclusive, as a kind of aftertought, is a bit lame, but hey, better than nothing I suppose.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Goblin Haberdasher
    Hats off to that design.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Very Cryptic Command
    Yeah, that's weird.

    They should have gone with stuff like
    - Counter target spell that targets a target target player doesn't control
    - Untap all tapped creatures target player controls then tap all untapped creatures target player doesn't control

    and so on.

    That would have been Very Cryptic Command

    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 7

    posted a message on Hascon IMA (And Ixalan) Spoilers Thread!
    Wizards are reprinting 200$-level cards and people are complaining? Wow. Mana Drain is an impressive choice for sure, one we have waited for for years and years. Nice!!!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.