2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Major changes to Magic announced at SDCC? (New booster variants and premium styles)
    If it were WotC's call, I wouldn't be concerned about paper Magic being shut down. But, it isn't.

    It's Hasbro.

    The same company that made an SDCC exclusive, $150 Ghostbusters Optimus Prime for no apparent reason other than to see how many people were willing to fork over that much money for colored cardboard and plastic.

    The same company that made "Monopoly for Millennials" and replaced the properties with experiences. Why? Because, as the packaging itself states: "Forget real estate. You can't afford it anyway." Enough people thought this was a good idea that it was greenlit and produced.

    I have no faith in Hasbro to make intelligent decisions regarding Magic. But we'll know in less than 24 hours what news MaRo will be unveiling to us.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Major changes to Magic announced at SDCC? (New booster variants and premium styles)
    The end of paper Magic tournaments is nigh. All the "pro" events and qualifiers will be through Arena starting in 2020. Profit margins are higher, and there's no need for judges or TOs, or to scrounge enough physical product on hand to supply players and have prize support.

    I would also not be surprised if the announcement stated that "Throne of Eldraine" will be the last paper Magic product.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on CCL July, Top 6: All Must Be Compleat

    Mr. Rithaniel: If the creature's abilities are being nerfed, why not slap it all the way down to drone stats of 0/1 or 1/1?

    Subject16: Why does the Phyrexian BoP need to pay (G/P) in addition to the tap for mana? And why is the double proliferate so costly?

    bravelion83: Make a token. Pay an extra penalty if you paid life. Change it to an opponent of your choice instead of target so you can't sidestep the penalty if they're behind hexproof.

    netn10: Did you intentionally forget a creature type? You need to improve the language and punctuation in your activated ability, given how disparate the first two sections are.

    Jimmy Groove: Considering you can't smack an opponent in the face with the damage (once you figure out if it targets or you choose), the casting cost is steep. Maybe 3(U/P)(B/P)(R/P) to limit abuse?

    Top 3
    3. Subject16
    2. Jimmy Groove
    1. bravelion83
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 1

    posted a message on Club Flamingo ☆ Exclusively for Custom Card Connoisseurs and Great People
    I think Subject16 should win just for "Duck". I also think Subject16 should update their IIW, since we already did "nonblack Zombies" recently.
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 2

    posted a message on [Monthly Card Contest] ***MCC*** Discussion Thread
    The phrase that had me questioning the potential restriction was "normal artifact", in combination with the subsequent wording used after that phrase that only listed examples of what one might expect with a noncreature artifact.

    Thank you for the further clarification.
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 3

    posted a message on [Monthly Card Contest] ***MCC*** Discussion Thread
    And with the last of the scores tallied, the winner of the June MCC is bravelion83. Congrats!

    Your foil Alpha Volcanic Island is in the mail, and you should receive it no later than August 32nd.
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 1

    posted a message on [Monthly Card Contest] ***MCC*** Discussion Thread
    Quote from bravelion83 »
    More questions for round 2.
    Suppose I want to use emerge and I make a card with the exact same text as Abundant Maw but with no mana cost. Having no mana cost gives no other means to cast the card than emerge.


    Much like Ancestral Vision, the card can be cast via other spells and effects, such as Cascade or the Expertise cycle, so it does qualify. The main challenge is to design a card with an alternate casting cost; the second subchallenge was to give an excuse to switch things up. For example, say, a creature with a Dash but no normal casting cost (which may be what a modern version of Viashino Cutthroat might look like).

    Quote from bravelion83 »

    1. Does the cast ability count for subchallenge 1, as the only way you can cast the card and trigger that ability is via emerge? I think the answer is no, but I thought to ask just to be sure rather than making assumptions.
    2. What if I substitute the cast ability with a different ability that cares about the sacrificed creature? For example if the Maw drained X life, where X is the sacrificed creature's cmc, power, or toughness.
    3. Or would it just have to be literally "When CARDNAME's emerge cost is paid" or "if you paid CARDNAME's emerge cost"?


    1. No, it would not, which is why I used Rix Maadi Reveler as an example. It has a different effect if the Spectacle cost was paid.
    2. You're not getting an additional effect with a sacrificed creature, you're gaining an additional cost that is built into the spell.
    3. Basically this, which is why I chose a specific card to illustrate an example that would meet the subchallenge.

    EDIT: I added another note to the Clarifications, primarily regarding Subchallenge 2.
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 1

    posted a message on Club Flamingo ☆ Exclusively for Custom Card Connoisseurs and Great People

    Koth's Gambit 1RR
    Sorcery (R)
    Choose one:
    - Discard your hand, then draw a card for each Mountain you control.
    - Koth’s Gambit deals damage equal to the number of Mountains you control to any target.
    - Take an extra turn after this one. At the beginning of that turn’s end step, you lose the game.

    IIW: Shard Colored Vehicles
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 1

    posted a message on May MCC Judge Signups
    I shall judge as well.
    Posted in: Custom Card Contests and Games
  • 1

    posted a message on WPN Crackdown?
    There are too many people misquoting Bergeot (seriously, RTFT), so I'm just going to quote her tweet directly:

    Quote from Helene Bergeot »
    This is about stores running events for profit, not about playtesting between friends


    She uses the word "events" not "tournaments" in the tweet. FNM is an "event for profit." Open Play is an "event for profit." Opening the doors at a business on a day where you do not state that proceeds are being donated is an "event for profit." Had she used the word "tournaments" instead of "events" this point would be less murky. She did not.

    So, yes, continued concern is justified that Sharpie proxies could get a store's WPN participation revoked if someone has an axe to grind with a LGS.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.