@YWF Where does Flarg-as-SK fit in #1816?
Regarding Zionite, he has become a lot more controversial now than he was Day 1, with more people willing to defend him now, so he would by no means be an "easy lynch".
Regarding Flarg's potential push on Zionite toDay, he was already backtracking on his Zion read yesterDay, so no pushing him wasn't really an option.
[/font]
Agreed he's currently controversial but as of end of D1/n2 this hadn't been established so in the context of that mindset wouldn't come into play.
Honestly....Flarg as SK is kinda pinging me as unlikely cause it seems a bit of a bastard set up...which in my experience is something players are warned about. I don't think I've ever played in a game that had a SK that didn'y come with an outright warning there was one or at least a label that there'd be bastard elements present.
Why not save the day for actual analysis, instead of spending the entire day trying to figure out v/v or w/v? Vig shot saves an entire day, and gives ideas to people against both.
If you're certain Zio is scum though you wouldn't be spending an entire day figuring out v/v or w/v you'd be arguing your case against him and analyzing the reactions of the other players to find his scum mates. You get more to analyze from an alive zio than a dead one cause a live zio does things (in theory.....once hes active again....)
i.... dont think we could agree less on how town should use a vig shot.
I don't see the point in using up an ability on a scum read that you should have great deal of confidence in leading a lynch on. If I see a road that should be by all appearances easy to take why waste a boost on it? It's like looking at a nail sticking up out of a board and grabbing a 10 lb sledgehammer
I don’t buy the vig. Why shoot grape? He was t even voting at the end of the day why not shoot Zion?
More people on his wagon and would have been better for Poe
what would a scum!flarg gain by claiming vig who shot town? If he's not a vig then who killed grape considering one of the most certain town people of the game Sloth was also allegedly shot at? If anything this only would make sense if Flarg had used the D1 momentum started pushing for Zio again instead of reversing his read D2.
Neither faction has ANYTHING to gain by killing zio N1 if I'm being honest. A town player thinking he's scum is wasting a shot against an easy lynch given he was the second strongest wagon D1....a scum member is wasting an easy mislynch. No one would have ANYTHING to gain from wasting a shot on Zio.
he was informing how we shouldn’t try and set up game and that is not a pointless statement and is particularly NAI.
Calling it pointless and then voting him for it feels like scum latching on to a mislynch
Did you only read part of what he said? Because that's not what happened. He said "Doing X is suspicious but I understand it. It's fluff...but I get it."
He was not informing us of anything. He was waffling and casting doubt on people all keeping it at arms length.
Possibly both I suppose but that seems less likely.
Vote: Jackrito
I like this vote. Jack has a bunch of reads and feels the need to correct himself when he said he didn’t have as many. Basic Concept of scum losing track of what they are saying while they are posting (I know from much experience)
Why would you quote a vote instead of an example of Jack's scummy action you're building a case around?
....unrelated to the actually game but I gotta says GJ and Jackritos names are throwing me cause Sloth is Johnny and I'm Jack/Jacki so my brain stutters every so often reading people's posts.
Agreed he's currently controversial but as of end of D1/n2 this hadn't been established so in the context of that mindset wouldn't come into play.
Honestly....Flarg as SK is kinda pinging me as unlikely cause it seems a bit of a bastard set up...which in my experience is something players are warned about. I don't think I've ever played in a game that had a SK that didn'y come with an outright warning there was one or at least a label that there'd be bastard elements present.
....coupled with this gif why do I have a feeling that the redacted towntell you've brought up is insulting?
I wouldn't have shot anyone N1. I think that was a mistake.
If you're certain Zio is scum though you wouldn't be spending an entire day figuring out v/v or w/v you'd be arguing your case against him and analyzing the reactions of the other players to find his scum mates. You get more to analyze from an alive zio than a dead one cause a live zio does things (in theory.....once hes active again....)
I don't see the point in using up an ability on a scum read that you should have great deal of confidence in leading a lynch on. If I see a road that should be by all appearances easy to take why waste a boost on it? It's like looking at a nail sticking up out of a board and grabbing a 10 lb sledgehammer
I literally never said this. Do you usually make up things when pressure is applied?
Patience is a virtue as is addressing questions directly to a person instead of a general "Why y'all doing this?"
I am not sure how I feel on Rhand. I do know how I feel on KCC/Rod.
It makes no logical sense. Why would you waste an action on someone who by all rational should be an easy to tackle during the Day?
what would a scum!flarg gain by claiming vig who shot town? If he's not a vig then who killed grape considering one of the most certain town people of the game Sloth was also allegedly shot at? If anything this only would make sense if Flarg had used the D1 momentum started pushing for Zio again instead of reversing his read D2.
Neither faction has ANYTHING to gain by killing zio N1 if I'm being honest. A town player thinking he's scum is wasting a shot against an easy lynch given he was the second strongest wagon D1....a scum member is wasting an easy mislynch. No one would have ANYTHING to gain from wasting a shot on Zio.
Did you only read part of what he said? Because that's not what happened. He said "Doing X is suspicious but I understand it. It's fluff...but I get it."
He was not informing us of anything. He was waffling and casting doubt on people all keeping it at arms length.
what about Zio's post was pointy to you? What did you glean from it?
Why would you quote a vote instead of an example of Jack's scummy action you're building a case around?
Cause I'm voting KCC
Cause I'm voting KCC.
Aid the ignorant....CC?