It's not Tibalt 2.0, it's Tibalt 3.0. Tibalt, rakish instigator is an amazing and yet fair designed card. It was my fav in standard when legal, hosed so much of the white lifegain nonsense out there.
But it says right in the text that either side you use has to fit the criteria. So confused.
To the judges I go.
Edit: rulings guys clarified it, I am wrong. Somehow cascade ignores above text. They need to fix this asap
I thought kaldeim rules primer did say that only top part of DF cards is used for cascade type effects?
The Cascade rules I've read are that only the front face is respected for whether a card can be cast with Cascade, but either face can be cast this way.
I don't understand. If only the top side is searched for then how can you possibly cast the other side?
Edit: I have this text from release to support you are wrong "If it does, it enters the battlefield with its front face up. For example, if an effect allows "
Edit two: "an effect allows you to play a land or cast a spell from among a group of cards, you may play or cast a modal double-faced card with any face that fits the criteria of that effect. " So unless you play a cascade spell of 8 then tibalt side does not fit the cascade criteria.
Absolutely agree. I can't remember, but was coldsnap legal in standard when it came out? This would be a way to sneak rampant growth back into standard, something I would really like.
curses are definitely more interesting than this trash, simply because enchant player is so rare. Also curses are tied thickly into Egyptian and witch lore
To the judges I go.
Edit: rulings guys clarified it, I am wrong. Somehow cascade ignores above text. They need to fix this asap
I don't understand. If only the top side is searched for then how can you possibly cast the other side?
Edit: I have this text from release to support you are wrong "If it does, it enters the battlefield with its front face up. For example, if an effect allows "
Edit two: "an effect allows you to play a land or cast a spell from among a group of cards, you may play or cast a modal double-faced card with any face that fits the criteria of that effect. " So unless you play a cascade spell of 8 then tibalt side does not fit the cascade criteria.
Absolutely agree. I can't remember, but was coldsnap legal in standard when it came out? This would be a way to sneak rampant growth back into standard, something I would really like.
Getting very tired of this...