Skellum of the Shadows2BB
Legendary Creature- Human Wizard
Creatures you control are Nightmares in addition to their other creature types.
BB, Sacrifice a Nightmare, Search your library for a creature with converted mana cost X or less and put it onto the battlefield, where X is the number of Nightmares you control.
@GS: QUESTION TWO: Why did I never follow up with Killjoy: Is your name Killjoy? No. Then you shouldn't care about this. I've been waiting for him to bring it up, but he never did, and you've gone and ruined it now. Why did not you not ask Killjoy why he didn't follow up with me at the same time you asked me this?
Are you really trying to deflect your lack of following up on something you deemed very important onto me? I'm not your nanny, GS. I'm not here to make sure you do your homework.
Unrelated, why so many mini-gambits? First it was the "lol proph's scum guys. no unvotes no brakes" in RVS and beyond, then the question thing which you're not following up on because... you want to see my reaction to you not following up on it?
<rhetorical>Um... what?</rhetorical>
Also, I don't like your lack of openness this game. It's disconcerting.
I'm close to voting you based on ^ question. I'm just still not conviced that Proph isn't a better lynch toDay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @Fulcrum: Can you tell me why you disagree with the major points on my case on Proph?
And as far as I can tell you've really only wanted to lynch Arian today. Other than that you've been kinda fence-sitty. Your 378 does an OK job but I only really remember you mentioning those three with any suspicion. Any other scumspects?
What do you think of Proph's case on HookerPunch?
Now to respond to your stuff.
No. I'm saying that he knows I always vote for a reason, even if I don't say it.
Ok. How does he know that?
He's not. But if he won't respond to my pressure without a vote, then I'll vote for him. And he won't respond to that, then I'll get people to join me. Help me pressure him.
I'd rather my vote do something useful right now. But here: Hey Seppel! Stop being useless!
Maybe that'll help.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @Prophy: In your 372 and 375, you seem very... apologetic toward Hooker, even though you think he's scum. That's not a typical emotion to have, expecially considering he's trying to discredit you.
I mean, here's the last line of your case: Arianrhod needs to vote Natirasha. fulcrum needs to vote Natirasha. ITF needs to vote Natirasha. Rhand needs to vote Natirasha. Everyone else is already on the Natirasha wagon or is a lost cause {GS, Seppel, Killjoy}. (which shows a confident push) and here's the first line of your next response to Hooker (he doesn't think you paid attention during some games you were in together) They were the only games I've played with you. I've been poking around mafiascum a lot lately (clicking random MD threads, reading games with MTGSers in them) but I don't recall thoroughly reading a game with you in it, besides those two. (which feels like you're putting on kiddy-gloves with him). It feels weird that this is your response to him when you think he's scum. Your responses lack... defensiveness, I suppose? Can you elaborate on why that is?
This statement: How am I supposed to townread you, then, if you're actually town (which I highly doubt you are)?
I'm a fan of lynching people who do scummy things, though, if I can't find a town mindset baked somewhere in there! People who do scummy things are pretty often scum.
The first sentence massively overqualifies itself. It doesn't feel like a thought someone would actually have. It feels... fake. It feels... overly convoluted. IDK this is hard to explain. It's just... too much. I mean... you say 'if you're actually town' (indicating that you're not as confident in your case than you're indicating in the case) followed by 'which I highly doubt you are' (which I feel like if this were one cohesive thought would have been more heavily alluded to before we get to this point in the thought).
As for the second: The fact that you think this, Prophy should allow you sympathy toward my feelings toward you. You're being scummy. I can't find a whole lotta town in your mindset. But you actively dismiss my case, my thoughts of you as tunnelly and unwarranted. I don't get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @HookerPunch: Self-meta is useless.
Question: Why do you think Fulcrum is scum?
I feel like he's town. He's seeing a discrepency in what he sees as his expected town reaction, per the quote, and what was actually said. He actually makes a good case om that he details the logic behind it fairly well, showing he actually thought it out and probably believes it.
Zombied likely,. btw
Legendary Creature- Human Wizard
Creatures you control are Nightmares in addition to their other creature types.
BB, Sacrifice a Nightmare,
2/2
Vote:Bad Hand and RaikouRider
IWW: An army of gnomes!
Vote SelesnyaNewLife
QUESTION TWO: Why did I never follow up with Killjoy: Is your name Killjoy? No. Then you shouldn't care about this. I've been waiting for him to bring it up, but he never did, and you've gone and ruined it now. Why did not you not ask Killjoy why he didn't follow up with me at the same time you asked me this?
Are you really trying to deflect your lack of following up on something you deemed very important onto me? I'm not your nanny, GS. I'm not here to make sure you do your homework.
Unrelated, why so many mini-gambits? First it was the "lol proph's scum guys. no unvotes no brakes" in RVS and beyond, then the question thing which you're not following up on because... you want to see my reaction to you not following up on it?
<rhetorical>Um... what?</rhetorical>
Also, I don't like your lack of openness this game. It's disconcerting.
I'm close to voting you based on ^ question. I'm just still not conviced that Proph isn't a better lynch toDay.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Fulcrum: Can you tell me why you disagree with the major points on my case on Proph?
And as far as I can tell you've really only wanted to lynch Arian today. Other than that you've been kinda fence-sitty. Your 378 does an OK job but I only really remember you mentioning those three with any suspicion. Any other scumspects?
What do you think of Proph's case on HookerPunch?
Now to respond to your stuff.
No. I'm saying that he knows I always vote for a reason, even if I don't say it.
Ok. How does he know that?
He's not. But if he won't respond to my pressure without a vote, then I'll vote for him. And he won't respond to that, then I'll get people to join me. Help me pressure him.
I'd rather my vote do something useful right now. But here: Hey Seppel! Stop being useless!
Maybe that'll help.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Prophy: In your 372 and 375, you seem very... apologetic toward Hooker, even though you think he's scum. That's not a typical emotion to have, expecially considering he's trying to discredit you.
I mean, here's the last line of your case: Arianrhod needs to vote Natirasha. fulcrum needs to vote Natirasha. ITF needs to vote Natirasha. Rhand needs to vote Natirasha. Everyone else is already on the Natirasha wagon or is a lost cause {GS, Seppel, Killjoy}. (which shows a confident push) and here's the first line of your next response to Hooker (he doesn't think you paid attention during some games you were in together)
This statement: How am I supposed to townread you, then, if you're actually town (which I highly doubt you are)?
I'm a fan of lynching people who do scummy things, though, if I can't find a town mindset baked somewhere in there! People who do scummy things are pretty often scum.
The first sentence massively overqualifies itself. It doesn't feel like a thought someone would actually have. It feels... fake. It feels... overly convoluted. IDK this is hard to explain. It's just... too much. I mean... you say 'if you're actually town' (indicating that you're not as confident in your case than you're indicating in the case) followed by 'which I highly doubt you are' (which I feel like if this were one cohesive thought would have been more heavily alluded to before we get to this point in the thought).
As for the second: The fact that you think this, Prophy should allow you sympathy toward my feelings toward you. You're being scummy. I can't find a whole lotta town in your mindset. But you actively dismiss my case, my thoughts of you as tunnelly and unwarranted. I don't get it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@HookerPunch: Self-meta is useless.
Question: Why do you think Fulcrum is scum?
586: Bussing?
Council of Elders
Creature- Elf Shaman
1/1
iww: an army of gnomes!