2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Oko, Thief of Crowns
    Am I the only one who thinks that being able to beast within your opponent's best creatures and/or artifacts as a +1 is a little pushed?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Oko, Thief of Crowns
    Yes, they are. Gilded Goose produces them.
    Posted in: Oko, Thief of Crowns
  • 2

    posted a message on Comander 2019 preview schedule
    Quote from Xcric »
    when there's so many different websites, channels, and feeds getting previews that you need to publish an article to track them all, its time to rethink how you ******* preview things.

    sweet ******* jesus. no one is going to go to all that ***** to see some damn spoilers. they're going to just go somewhere that shows them all at once.

    their spoiler strategy sucks so much dick and is beyond obnoxious now.
    That's why I ignore all of them and just look at spoilers on sites like this one or on mythic spoilers or mtgpics.
    I can't stand most of the youtube videos with spoilers (apart from Desolator, at least his commentary is funny sometimes), I neither have the will nor the time to watch long boring streams on twitch just to look at a low-quality screencap of a card and I can't be bothered with Twatter.

    At least this time they will spoil an entire deck each day starting from august 5.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Next set is called "Throne of Eldraine"
    Not sure about that. It could be a prominent tribe, but not have real tribal support, like Angels in the Innistrad block.
    On the other hand, it would be nice to have knights in colors different from black and white.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 3

    posted a message on Next set is called "Throne of Eldraine"
    Quote from Jiyor »
    Quote from Manite »

    Hey, maybe they're bringing Lord back as a creature type? Or Royal? Or they could have King, Queen, Prince, and Princess as separate types grouped into a royal batch mechanic. Like a Knight creature that gets +1/+1 as long as you control a royal creature.


    WotC is still seems to be focused on pandering to SJW’s so if they did it would be Royal to not force gender roles onto characters. Though it does make sense to use Royal since it denotes lineage of which the gender isn’t the focal point and this would definitely be the plane to introduce it with.
    To bad all the SJW’s are gonna hate Rowan now. She’s annoyed the didn’t summon her brother as well. A female showing concern for a white male isn’t going over well with WotC’s preferred demographic....non white, non males.


    I will never understand this mindset. WotC wants to broaden the appeal of their products and somehow it’s an attack on white males? What is it exactly that they’re doing to you?
    If the recent tweet from Lee Sharpe is any indication of their attitude towards straight cisgendered white males, then WotC is actually discriminating on that demographic.

    If you take that tweet and change any of the demographic descriptors in anything else the tweet would read quite (depending on what you change) racist, homophobic, transphobic or sexist.

    If that is the attitude of the people behind the game, it is hard to call it "broadening the appeal of their product".
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Next set is called "Throne of Eldraine"
    Female King Arthur... Either she is Sabre or the set is dead to me XD
    Anyway, everyone with a drop of good taste knows that King Arthur can only be depicted in the likes of Graham Arthur Chapman.
    ...The set really needs a Killer Rabbit, tho...

    If WotC is going to take pretty much every popular public domain fairy tale and switch it around in order to "subvert expectations", the gimmick is going to grow old very soon.
    It is pretty early to jump to conclusions, but with WotC being WotC, I don't expect them becoming creative with this kind of source material. At most they will switch some roles around (Goldilocks becoming a bear hunter) and the little mermaid being a human girl turned into a mermaid. All "damsel in distress" tropes will either be genderbent or removed outright (because there otherwise would be a twittermob calling for their heads at the cry of "toxic masculinity" and "kissing Sleeping Beauty / Snowwhite is sexual assault!").

    I would have been hyped for the setting as long as it was just high fantasy... Put in the fairytales and WotC adding a "twist" on them and you lose me...
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Next set is called "Throne of Eldraine"
    For me McKinnon's art is very hit or miss.
    Some I like very much, for example Blood for Bones, Unholy Indenture or Answered Prayers, others are a complete miss for my tastes (Deliver Unto Evil or Dirge of Dread), yet he seems he got his stride going when he started using more abstract compositions starting from Dominaria (or little earlier with Phantom Tiger).
    Looking at the artwork he is doing now for cards, you would be hard pressed to believe that he also made pretty generic artwork like Attended Knight or Blind Obedience
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Full spoiler is up
    Dawning Angel Well... Domri just reincarnated as an angel on another plane, it seems.
    Just a bad, random androgynous angel with horrible hairstyle. Yet this begs the question:When are they going to give us our first female demon?

    No, Lady Orca does not count! She was errataed into one!

    It is not like they have to make a succubus (too spicy for current year MtG) but something like Sheoldred would pass for a demon without a second glance if you didn't know she was a phyrexian praetor.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Core 2020 Name and Number Crunch
    ... Aaaand they are missing all the additional cards after 280...
    We know most of them, but at the moment there are some egregious holes in the lineup:

    A list of the numbers still missing from the known cards
    - 302 to 306
    - 308
    - 309
    - 311 to 316
    - 318 to 320
    - 322
    - 335 EDIT: Shivan Dragon might fit here
    - 336 EDIT: Shock might fit here
    - 339 to 431
    That's 22 cards still unknown, but standard legal for another year.
    When I have time I'll check if the empty spaces match with the extra cards in the spellslinger decks and/or unlisted cards in the planeswalker's decks.

    EDIT2: even by putting the cards from the planeswalkers decks in as if they were all M20 reprints either I'm missing things or the cards don't fit in the crunch. Then I realized:
    We are still missing the welcome decks!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Question: Does Torgaar, Famine Incarnate + Divine Visitation + Bishop of Wings work the way I think it does?
    If you mean to get a loop while casting Torgaar, no.
    You sacrifice the angels as part of the cost and the token-making effect of the bishop only triggers when Torgaar is placed on the stack after you finished to pay the cost for the spell and the alternative or additional costs connected.

    If you want to loop the angels you need a free sacrifical outlet (in standard there are none currently). In other formats altar of dementia (for milling your opponent) or Ashnod's Altar/Phyrexian Altar to get infinite mana could be some choices, as well as Viscera Seer to scry your entire library 1 card at a time.

    As for the bishop alone, it almost triggers resplendent angel, you just need an extra life. Not a combo, but a nice synergy.
    Arcane Adaptation is a cheaper way to turn your spirit tokens into angels (1/1 flying spirit angels), but will leave standard in 3 months.

    EDIT: thinking about it, there is a way in standard to have a loop for this, but it is so far fetched and christmas-landy that if actally manage to make it work you deserve a prize.
    Bishop of Wings + Divine Visitation + Arcane Adaptation (choose Goblin) + Skirk Prospector to sacrifice your angel goblin tokens and get R for each one.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.