This site works best with JavaScript enabled. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this site.
Quote from Creedmoor »Went with both suggestions just to see how it looked.
Quote from 5colors »Quote from SnowBunny »Why THE EVER LOVING HELL was Zendikar ever afraid of the Eldrazi when they had THIS THING lying around???? Kiora thought the same thing with Lorthos. May he rest in his many cut up pieces.
Quote from SnowBunny »Why THE EVER LOVING HELL was Zendikar ever afraid of the Eldrazi when they had THIS THING lying around????
Quote from lookingupanddown » Isn't this a white ability? Source: LordTupperware
Quote from Crispen_Smith »Damn if that flavor text isn't the best thing in the entire set.
Quote from Ryperior74 »Quote from Dontrike »Quote from Outcryqq » I guess I feel much differently than you do. Many of these, in my opinion, easily replace a basic land in most EDH decks and that deck instantly gets a little bit better. Having a relevant spell in the late game, or a land in the early game, is huge, considering the nearly-zero opportunity cost of running it in a land slot. This is especially true for the mythic versions which can ETB untapped for 3 life. But any of the relevant modal spells could easily become commander staples IMO. I find it so strange people are so willing to get rid of basics in their EDH decks where there are plenty of cards that will straight stop you from playing when you have too few basics. indeed I wouldn’t remove basics for these they said like several times you choose the side your using before the game begins
Quote from Dontrike »Quote from Outcryqq » I guess I feel much differently than you do. Many of these, in my opinion, easily replace a basic land in most EDH decks and that deck instantly gets a little bit better. Having a relevant spell in the late game, or a land in the early game, is huge, considering the nearly-zero opportunity cost of running it in a land slot. This is especially true for the mythic versions which can ETB untapped for 3 life. But any of the relevant modal spells could easily become commander staples IMO. I find it so strange people are so willing to get rid of basics in their EDH decks where there are plenty of cards that will straight stop you from playing when you have too few basics.
Quote from Outcryqq » I guess I feel much differently than you do. Many of these, in my opinion, easily replace a basic land in most EDH decks and that deck instantly gets a little bit better. Having a relevant spell in the late game, or a land in the early game, is huge, considering the nearly-zero opportunity cost of running it in a land slot. This is especially true for the mythic versions which can ETB untapped for 3 life. But any of the relevant modal spells could easily become commander staples IMO.
Quote from sleeper agent 2.0 »Hmm. They are really designing for arena now. A whole sleeved deck with half DFCs would be really annoying to play with.
Quote from Creedmoor »Quote from Patch8700 »I think people are too hard on the dfc lands. They have the potential to be good. I know the spell sides tend to cost a bit more than it looks like they should, but there's always been a premium to versatility and sometimes it's worth it. The ability to reduce mana screw and mana flood at the deck construction level is something that we sorely need more of. I agree, but so far it feels like many of the effects on the spell side are cards I probably wouldn't play outside of limited in the first place. They all appear to be sideboard/limited fodder. I also feel like they could have made most of the spells sides 1 mana less than they cost, or at least 1 mana more than the standard spell effect. 5 mana for a basic Treason effect is heavy.
Quote from Patch8700 »I think people are too hard on the dfc lands. They have the potential to be good. I know the spell sides tend to cost a bit more than it looks like they should, but there's always been a premium to versatility and sometimes it's worth it. The ability to reduce mana screw and mana flood at the deck construction level is something that we sorely need more of.
Quote from sleeper agent 2.0 »The idea of a lot of the party cards seems to be "you you really want to have just one of each of us, but we have riders that help ourselves in case you have redundancy in one party slot." I am sure that is helpful for gameplay purposes. But it also feels like a lot of tribal being shoehorned into a supposedly "lands matter" set.
Quote from Marek14 »So if you exile a card and then Valakut Exploration leaves the battlefield, that card is available permanently?