"A new legendary creature card that combines two characters that previously each had their own legendary creature card."
Grandpa Markov and Olivia, it seems. Years past I was hoping for a card depicting the Fourth Sister (Liesa) and a demonic lover, but I suppose two vampires will do.
Nah I bet they're the Vampire nobles and it's Halena and Alana.
Who said those two hints can't refer to the same card? You technically get two new Vampire Nobles, just on one card. Seems like a very Maro way to make hints...
The Travails took much from Innistrad, but faith is a hard thing to break. Even when the object of that faith falls as hard and far as Avacyn fell.
For weeks after the Travails, her wolves wanted nothing to do with human society, and she could hardly blame them. To walk among man was to breathe in their sorrows and bear their weight.
I wonder how they're going to justify the lore we've already seen from current day Kamigawa. Because we know that there are sections that aren't all cyberpunked from the stories about Tamiyo and her children.
I imagine the same way they dealt with the issue(s) of Zendikar vampires - they'll retcon what doesn't fit their new vision.
The story is set after Sarkhan went back in time and saved Ugin's life. Thus the Dragonlords are in charge and the Khans are dead or hiding their former identity (like Yasowa).
You can donate to any political cause or any organization.
The chances you agree with ALL of their points on the agenda are practically zero.
Right. Guess what? Even if she doesn't fully embrace the worst points on the agenda of the groups she supported, it still means she at best doesn't care that they're there. Still not a great situation to be in when it comes to the kind of groups that are involved here.
Unless you're the kind of person that would say "Antonio may be a murderous thug serving the mafia, but I like how he keeps his lawn, so I'll support him".
Keyword is additive for now and will not replace anything
Because that heavily implies that it's something that would functionally change cards if applied retroactively, which would mean it's probably not stalking, lure or daunt because those are pretty straightforward mechanically.
Nah, Astarion - the guy from Baldur's Gate 3.
Probably because enchantment removal already doest that, and a card that said "Destroy target Curse" would be extremely narrow and largely unplayable.
Who said those two hints can't refer to the same card? You technically get two new Vampire Nobles, just on one card. Seems like a very Maro way to make hints...
So yeah, seems it is the term for the SoI plot.
I imagine the same way they dealt with the issue(s) of Zendikar vampires - they'll retcon what doesn't fit their new vision.
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/first-look-innistrad-midnight-hunt-and-innistrad-crimson-vow-2021-08-05
Also, the boxes say that they include 8 set boosters.
Not Innistrad ones - hence Sorin being able to be a Walker.
Works better as a non-legend.
Right. Guess what? Even if she doesn't fully embrace the worst points on the agenda of the groups she supported, it still means she at best doesn't care that they're there. Still not a great situation to be in when it comes to the kind of groups that are involved here.
Unless you're the kind of person that would say "Antonio may be a murderous thug serving the mafia, but I like how he keeps his lawn, so I'll support him".
Right, basically funding something is not supporting it in any way, shape or form. Right.
Maro.
https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/646186624282148864/will-the-new-evergreen-mechanic-be-replacing-a