Get 2/2 godless shrine and silent clearing, not only you need them they will go up in price as the year ends and clearing probably will rise in the not distant future.
My early testing with SFM (mostly in a UW Midrange shell a la Cawblade or Legacy UW Stoneblade) seems to indicate that the card is balanced in Modern, at least against fair decks and more controlling decks. Jund often had enough removal to kill SFM first, Batterskull later, and every single Sword carrier for dessert. Mono-G Tron needed to get disrupted (often at least twice) or it ran over Team SFM's board state regardless of SFM. Whirza often forced through its infinite combo (Thopter-Sword-Urza) through disruption, and it could always lean on trying to force through Ensnaring Bridge as a back-up plan. I'm not optimistic that SFM will perform any better against combo than Goyf already does because the life gain rarely matters and SFM delays itself for a turn trying to reach Goyf size. I built a Saheeli Copycat Snowblade deck in the process, and initial testing of that one is promising, but it has a larger weakness to combo. (One thing that makes me optimistic about Copycat Snowblade is that it mirrors the Twinblade decks of yore, and already Jund felt the pinch between breaking up the combo and nuking Batterskull once in testing.)
Of course, SFM is likely going to try its best to warp the Burn, Mono-Red Prowess, and UWx Control match-ups in its favour. I should try these match-ups next.
I'm now more confident that more optimal Modern SFM shells need more creatures (or at least more Lingering Souls) to make any Swords tutored for worth a card. Even the vaunted Sword of Fire and Ice was often worse than Batterskull (though I think SoFaI is the better choice against combo because of the card draw and similar clock speed-up).
I agree, after playing in MTGO since Monday with and against SFM it doesn't seem to make any current deck better, if anything it will give UW control the batterskull they need to survive vs burn and dredge, but for other mid range decks dealing with it is easy.
The words seem still very slow:
Turn 1.- discard or cantrip
Turn 2.- SFM
turn 3.- Before your 4th turn put a sword into play
turn 4.- equip sword, attack, opponent plays path to exile in response to equipping. You invested 6 mana with no payoff to speak for.
Nevertheless there is an infect deck running sigarda's aid and SFM to tutor for the big hammer and kill you in turn 3, and can pull some tricks.
Banning Looting is the final nail in the coffin of Modern. Hitting a wide swath of decks because people want less combo decks is dumb as hell. Modern will become a wasteland like Standard where 3-4 decks take control of the meta and nothing else will stand a chance. Expect a huge Tron revival now.
That's the plan and then BAN the Tron lands, and everyone will live happy ever after
So in GP Minneapolis Hogaak was almost 20% percent of the field on day one, the Top 16:
1. Hogaak
2. Hogaak
3. Mono Red Prowess
4. Hogaak
5. Hogaak
6. Burn
7. Hogaak
8. Humans
9. Eldrazi Tron
10. Hardened scales
11. Mono Red Phoenix
12. Mono Red Phoenix
13. Hogaak
14. Mono Red Phoenix
15. Hogaak
16. Merfolk
5 of top 8 and 7 in top 16.
IMHO it seems an emergency ban is required, other decks were running 6-8 hate pieces and it wasn't enough. With the last two modern GP's of the year in just 2 weeks I wonder if WotC wants to see the events being so warped around hogaak.
War of the spark book was a big dissapointment, can't believe they finished that story line with such a poor book and story for the battle. They really blew it.
I think it is a fundamentally wrong question. We know that Wizards designs only with Standard in mind and not Modern.
In every set there will be cards fitting all archetypes (i.e. aggro, midrange, control). From this cards, it follows that at some point there will be printings powerful enough to slot into decks of that type in eternal formats.
Further, there will be cards that are "fun" designs, but that can be broken in card pools as large as modern.
I don't think it's either a personal or a design bias. It is literally how magic is designed. If anything, we know that in the last decade or so Wizards would like to have a more creature focused environment, without pushing spells completely out of the way. Even in this environment, however, we still get tools for all and any deck. Quantifying and qualifying them doesn't really show anything about design intention.
If anything, it shows that the design team can still come up with unique and powerful card designs that have play even in eternal formats and can compete with old, broken spells. That's something we should compliment the design team for and not bash them, as they often get way too much flack.
Well Horizons actually ended this restriction and we are now in a different world.
That being said, they for sure don't design for legacy or vintage because narset, parter of veils and t3feri wouldn't have happened.
That is good to know on the forums. I have been on here for some time trying to get info on various decks.
That being said, Discord? I would love to have some access to that. I didn't see the info on the main page. Is it somewhere else?
I'd love to see the discussion on Sephara, I thought mainly cause you can get her out for much less than CMC on most occasions, that she makes other tokens indestructible, is a foil to Burn (takes at least three spells to kill), and seems to be immune to lots of common removal in the format. In, fact, I was trying to wrack my brain on what might be good against it, considering things like Maelstrom Pulse, Assassin's Trophy, etc. Even sacrifice effects are not really good, assuming you have tapped 4 to make her in the first place. Would love to see that discussion.
The problem with the card isn't what is good against it, as you correctly pointed out of the common removal in modern only 3 cards hit her: path, trophy and pulse. But what actually does the angel improve for us?
The angel could help in matches that are already quite good for us: burn, gds, and dredge (they will have a hell of a time removing her). It is a win more card there.
Vs The rock it dies, but it is already a good matchup.
Maybe vs phoenix but you run the risk of being bounced by TiTi.
In humans and spirits is going to be bounced by reflector mage and left you wide open to attack after tapping your stuff.
I feel it is big and flashy but ends up being a trap. A turn 4 sorin seems more relevant.
I would only replace gather the townsfolk for Auriok Champion, and it is very meta dependent, if there is a lot of Rock/Jund, GDS, Burn and dredge in your meta then Auriok is great.
I personally never have luck with zealous so I would prefer running 3 fatal push over them.
I agree, after playing in MTGO since Monday with and against SFM it doesn't seem to make any current deck better, if anything it will give UW control the batterskull they need to survive vs burn and dredge, but for other mid range decks dealing with it is easy.
The words seem still very slow:
Turn 1.- discard or cantrip
Turn 2.- SFM
turn 3.- Before your 4th turn put a sword into play
turn 4.- equip sword, attack, opponent plays path to exile in response to equipping. You invested 6 mana with no payoff to speak for.
Nevertheless there is an infect deck running sigarda's aid and SFM to tutor for the big hammer and kill you in turn 3, and can pull some tricks.
That's the plan and then BAN the Tron lands, and everyone will live happy ever after
1. Hogaak
2. Hogaak
3. Mono Red Prowess
4. Hogaak
5. Hogaak
6. Burn
7. Hogaak
8. Humans
9. Eldrazi Tron
10. Hardened scales
11. Mono Red Phoenix
12. Mono Red Phoenix
13. Hogaak
14. Mono Red Phoenix
15. Hogaak
16. Merfolk
5 of top 8 and 7 in top 16.
IMHO it seems an emergency ban is required, other decks were running 6-8 hate pieces and it wasn't enough. With the last two modern GP's of the year in just 2 weeks I wonder if WotC wants to see the events being so warped around hogaak.
Well Horizons actually ended this restriction and we are now in a different world.
That being said, they for sure don't design for legacy or vintage because narset, parter of veils and t3feri wouldn't have happened.
2 Windswept Heath
1 Shambling Vent
3 Concealed Courtyard
1 Marsh Flats
1 Vault of the Archangel
4 Plains
1 Swamp
3 Godless Shrine
1 Blast Zone
1 hall of heliod's generosity
3 Silent Clearing
The problem with the card isn't what is good against it, as you correctly pointed out of the common removal in modern only 3 cards hit her: path, trophy and pulse. But what actually does the angel improve for us?
The angel could help in matches that are already quite good for us: burn, gds, and dredge (they will have a hell of a time removing her). It is a win more card there.
Vs The rock it dies, but it is already a good matchup.
Maybe vs phoenix but you run the risk of being bounced by TiTi.
In humans and spirits is going to be bounced by reflector mage and left you wide open to attack after tapping your stuff.
I feel it is big and flashy but ends up being a trap. A turn 4 sorin seems more relevant.
or in the upcomming Standard+, I think there are a couple of good vampires in kaladesh too
I would only replace gather the townsfolk for Auriok Champion, and it is very meta dependent, if there is a lot of Rock/Jund, GDS, Burn and dredge in your meta then Auriok is great.
I personally never have luck with zealous so I would prefer running 3 fatal push over them.
I would recommend you guys try Liliana, dreadhorde general in that spot. The passive is super good and can get rid of stuff elspeth can't.