Why don't you just come out and say why you think I'm mafia rather than coyly toying with the idea and pretending you think it's a real thing you would pursue.
Because that's a needless distraction and waste of time. We need to decide Today's lynch, and it's clearly never going to be you. Not that I'd even want it to be, I'm still deciding where I even am on you.
Then stop gnashing your teeth and making subtle jabs at me.
I am confused about why people are finding it difficult to read or comprehend things about dk.
Nacho:
I don't like his posts, they feel sterile
He cased vezok then voted someone who sheeped his case.
His pushes are convenient.
Gemma:
His treatment of Sloth feels slimy.
He's not actively hunting.
Promised content, hasn't delivered.
Shaded the vezok wagon after pushing it.
Voted KCC thoughtlessly.
Had a secret scum read that he never followed up on - fake?
Some of these are reasons not to townread him, some of them are reasons to scumread him. The main common point for both Nacho and me is this:
Looks like Mindreaver is gonna be replaced, so I'm going to park my vote here for now. I think it's very likely that exactly one of the rush votes after I posted my case on vezok came from scum, and KCC's is the most dubious when coupled with earlier play.
Why is it very likely? He gives no reason for why he thinks this. The scum motivation here isn't very mysterious: to use the fact that people pushed on a town slot as a way to push them, without actually examining why they pushed on the slot, ignoring the fact that he also pushed on the town slot. KCC is an easy wagon to push, he had already voiced suspicion of her, so he votes her just because, without even looking at why she voted vezok.
Whether or not this is a scummy thing that town!dk is doing or a scummy thing that scum!dk is doing remains to be seen.
Rhand voted you for voting tom, tom accused you of TMI.
dk's sterility is his disinclination to produce anything game-changing, like a debate moderator handcuffed by a network committed to being as completely bland and centrist as possible so as to alienate as few viewers as possible.
I mean the fact that he started the Vez wagon disputes that theory of events.
Eh, he made that post at my prompting, kind of diminishes his agency in that. What else has he done?
Rhand voted you for voting tom, tom accused you of TMI.
dk's sterility is his disinclination to produce anything game-changing, like a debate moderator handcuffed by a network committed to being as completely bland and centrist as possible so as to alienate as few viewers as possible.
Think it goes a bit deeper than a tone read Grape. If Nacho's read is the same as mine, tone doesn't even enter into it. I think dk's tone this game is just his tone and has nothing to do with his alignment.
I think you're not understanding his read, or confusing his read on tom for his read on dk. He didn't say there wasn't anything scummy about dk, he said that dk has been sterile - that is different to "blah". He also pointed out that after he posted things about vezok that he presumably believed in, he turned around and scumread someone for agreeing with him, and did so in a kind of arbitrary way. Why did someone who voted with him have to be scum? It's like he invented that assumption in order to scumread someone. Why KCC over everyone else? She's a very convenient target for scum!dk, and there was no real reason for him to think she was scum over anyone else who voted vezok, he just had his earlier suspicion of her as justification.
I hate too townie to be town reads even more than I hate twtbaw reads. Sterile and doing sane solving things does not a wolf make... If you can pair that with evidence of agenda, then I'll listen to you. But I'm really not willing to accept paranoid, gut, too good to be true reads while you're claiming to have a tight town block that only doesn't include approximately 4 people. Plus his Vez vote wasn't overly convenient since it basically started the world thing.
I legitimately cannot make sense of this paragraph. To be honest most of your posts are borderline nonsensical to me, and I don't know if that's me problem or what's going on but I feel like I'm reading moral philosophy when I go through some your posts. Like are we in the same game / on the same earth? I am so confused.
That is a good point, agree scum!tom doesn't tend to care about tunneling you or your tilt. (Am really unused to you posting in big ass paragraphs, what the hell.)
This I could do. I doubt my wagon was pure. I really like Asta. Nacho still seems okay. Dk probably makes more sense than Gemma
Why don't you just come out and say why you think I'm mafia rather than coyly toying with the idea and pretending you think it's a real thing you would pursue.
@Nacho Am going back here. Her treatment of me + you is really gross.
Nacho:
I don't like his posts, they feel sterile
He cased vezok then voted someone who sheeped his case.
His pushes are convenient.
Gemma:
His treatment of Sloth feels slimy.
He's not actively hunting.
Promised content, hasn't delivered.
Shaded the vezok wagon after pushing it.
Voted KCC thoughtlessly.
Had a secret scum read that he never followed up on - fake?
Some of these are reasons not to townread him, some of them are reasons to scumread him. The main common point for both Nacho and me is this:
Why is it very likely? He gives no reason for why he thinks this. The scum motivation here isn't very mysterious: to use the fact that people pushed on a town slot as a way to push them, without actually examining why they pushed on the slot, ignoring the fact that he also pushed on the town slot. KCC is an easy wagon to push, he had already voiced suspicion of her, so he votes her just because, without even looking at why she voted vezok.
Whether or not this is a scummy thing that town!dk is doing or a scummy thing that scum!dk is doing remains to be seen.
dk's sterility is his disinclination to produce anything game-changing, like a debate moderator handcuffed by a network committed to being as completely bland and centrist as possible so as to alienate as few viewers as possible.
(Yes you are.) (... the fact that you're not aware of that is probably >rand town?)
Makes sense, Keldeo.
Can I help you do more things?