2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 7

    posted a message on Zendikar is underwheing
    Let's get this thread out of the way now.

    So I've been looking at the spoiler for the past three days and I probably won't be buying BFZ. A lot of the commons, uncommons, and rares so far look like draft cards and I'm going to mistake that for the set being underpowered. Ulamog doesn't suffle back when he dies, so he can't stop mill and therefore is garbage and not viable for modern play. Gideon is bad because he looks like Xenagos and Xenagos isn't seeing play at this moment so he must be bad too?? The lands are just strictly worse shocklands and standard rotates in 18 months so why bother buying them anyways? Overall the set feels gimmicky; why do "colorless matters" when there are clearly colored mana symbols on the card? I don't think there will be much value in bfz because the rares are bad and the full arts won't add value because everyone knows that basics in standard are worth nothing, so my frame of reference is absolute and correct about every new card. Not only that but you'll never see the full art shock lands, they're just a blatant cash grab from wotc. Overall I am an amateur who's been playing since Theros but since I won my FNM one time in March I am a master at evaluating new cards, and take my expert opinion to forums so players can get mad at just how wrong I am.


    You sir, are a communist.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • 3

    posted a message on So...What do you collect?
    I collect a lot of things...

    I actively collect:
    • Specific Artists (rk post, Rebecca Guay, Terese Nielsen, Cynthia Shepherd, Noah Bradley, to name a few)
    • Planeswalkers
    • Dragons
    • Original art (currently own three pieces)

    And working on getting sorted/started:
    • Angels
    • Demons
    • Faeries
    • Knights
    • Legends
    • Lands
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 3

    posted a message on Game etiquette: Offering to shake after a brutal game?


    The disconnect here is that your view of a “good” game has no bearing outside a kitchen table, whereas mine is rooted in the spirit of competitive play, proper manners, and good etiquette — not subjective emotional feelings such as whether or not it was “memorable” or “fun”.

    I will be quite honest: I don’t particularly care if my opponent did or did not have fun — I care about whether or not we sparred in a competitive fashion under the guidelines I originally posted. If we conducted ourselves in an adult and sportsman like manner, abiding by the rules of the game, then it was a good game. Fun is subjective; sparring within a prescribed set of guidelines is not.

    You are right that I don’t enjoy getting mana screwed. I don’t enjoy it because it hampers my ability to win — which is the entire point of competitive play. What I don’t do is whinge like a child about it. I accept that it happened and after the match I offer to shake my opponents hand, wish them the best of luck in the next round, and say good games. If they are the first to offer then I accept their offer for a handshake, wish them luck, and say good games. That’s the proper thing to do.

    Have you ever watched professional tennis? When Roger Federer was at his prime? He would routinely win matches in consecutive sets, barely letting his opponent onto the board. Yet every time after Federer would destroy someone, they would meet at the net and exchange pleasantries because that’s what mature adults do. Did his opponent enjoy getting embarrassed, perhaps on worldwide television, by Roger Federer? I highly doubt it. That also does not justify the refusal to exchange pleasantries or to cop an attitude.

    Remember when the Seattle Seahawks won the Super Bowl last year? They crushed the Denver Broncos in an embarrassing fashion. It was not close. Yet those very same Denver Broncos congratulated the winning Seattle team and, in the face of a very emotional defeat, conducted themselves as professionals and mature adults.

    This is no different. At all. You do not have to enjoy the match you lost. That lack of enjoyment does not excuse you, or anyone, from conducting themselves as mature adults with proper manners. It simply does not.

    As for the image issue: Your area does not constitute the greater Magic community. This is an issue that has been addressed at length by numerous people, including professionals. Yes, the Magic community has image issues, most of which are completely justified based on the way a very significant amount of players conduct themselves (I.E., with offensive language that belittles women and minorities, both racial and sexual, not to mention the propensity of Magic players to use 'retarded' as a pejorative, which is incredibly offensive and insensitive; immaturity, and incredibly poor social skills) and present themselves (I.E., poor personal hygiene and/or lack of proper grooming). The incredibly childish and immature attitudes being displayed by some individuals in this thread do nothing but reinforce the notion that Magic players have poor social skills and are immature.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Game etiquette: Offering to shake after a brutal game?
    Magic is a game of skill, and one of its parameters is luck -- when you sit down across from an opponent for a match, be it competitive or friendly, you are accepting the parameters of this game. You know, and accept, that you may win or lose, that you may have mana difficulties, that you may play poorly (or well), that you may be outplayed by an opponents mental game (or vice versa), so on and so forth. Any game that is fought fairly (which means within the rules and parameters of the game), with honour and within the spirit and rules of the game, is a good game. Whether or not you get mana flooded or mana screwed is irrelevant and does not change the meaning of "good game". The only time a game is not "good" is when one player cheats (thus violating the rules/spirit of the game) or one player conducts themselves in an unsportsmanlike manner (thus violating the parameters of competitive play/spirit of the game). If neither of these have occurred, then the game was, in fact, good.

    The concept that a game can only be "good" when the loser loses under certain circumstances (must have had an equal chance to win, no mana screw, no mana flood, must draw well, et al) is one of the most self-centred and immature things I have heard in some time from this community. The world does not revolve around any one person, so this self-centred immaturity is, point blank, without justification and unacceptable. It is borderline unsportsmanlike as well.

    The Magic community as a whole has massive image and reputation issues, and some of the attitudes being displayed here only reinforce the negative image and reputation the larger community has. Stop being part of the problem.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on [Basic Game] [#85] uPick Mafia - Game Over
    I think you did a fabulous job modding the game, Proph. I definitely liked having a vote count per page, which is something I will probably do myself as a host in the future.

    The note QT idea is neat; I was a fan of it and may end up stealing that idea in the future too. I share your disappointment that others didn't utilise theirs — I was looking forward to seeing others thought processes as well after being killed.

    All in all, I enjoyed this game, and I am looking forward to playing in your future games. Smile
    Posted in: Mafia
  • 2

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on Post Release Feedback
    Quote from chipanddale45
    Looks like I am going to have to start using addblock around here now, this site is miserable, before I loved the site and would make an excecption when I had add block on, now not so much. I hate it, and curse will not be getting any pennies from me. And they also track what I do, more so on the other site. Complete bull crap.


    Ghostery helps the tracking issue. The site looks quite nice when you use AdBlock though. I have completely removed the ads from the bottom of the page, twitter/FB buttons, premium ad, et al. Much nicer on the whole.
    Posted in: Forum Software Feedback and Bug Reports
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.